Skip to comments.Republicans Need Washingtons, not Specters
Posted on 05/11/2009 10:02:35 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross
The columns are all over the place, and all the analyses seem to be the same.
The Republican Party is supposedly deader than a doornail. Except in a handful of states in mid-America and in the South, Americans, according to these columnists, see Republicans as irrelevant, out-of-touch, mean-spirited dinosaurs.
And, they continue, among those groups that will demographically define the America of tomorrow -- the under-30 crowd and non-white America -- Republicans are toast.
These many columns inevitably lead to the conclusion that Republicans have no choice but to lighten up on the conservative agenda and buy into a new America of big government and gay marriage.
Truth is that Specter is neither a Republican nor a Democrat. He is a self serving egotist that stands for nothing other than the pursuit of personal political power and having the federal government as his sandbox to play in.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
Star Parker defines (and nails) Specter to a tee.
Frankly, while I respect and admire Washington, what ‘Pubbies need is a gazillion Washingtons AND Reagans.
What passes for Republicans today is unrecognizable to conservatives.
And, yes, there IS a difference.
And Hamiltons and Madisons and Jeffersons.......
Republicans Need MORE:
1) Adam Smiths
2) Milton Freidman
3) Thomas Sowell
4) Walter William
5) Gen. Patton
“And Hamiltons” NO MORE Hamiltons !
I will take Douglas MacArthurs over Pattons
Hamilton being the Federalist that he was, I’d bet he would have voted for Obama if he was alive today
Hamilton loved big government
And both (Hamilton and Obambi) were (and are) bastards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.