Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal prosecutor admits mistake, begs for leniency (Withheld Evidence)
The Boston Globe ^ | Jonathan Saltzman

Posted on 05/12/2009 4:00:38 PM PDT by buccaneer81

Federal prosecutor admits mistake, begs for leniency May 12, 2009 01:59 PM By Jonathan Saltzman, Globe Staff

A federal prosecutor today acknowledged that she withheld evidence that could have helped clear a defendant in a gun case but said it was an inadvertent mistake and implored the chief judge of the US District Court in Massachusetts not to impose sanctions that could derail her career.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: corruption; donutwatch; prosecutor; usatty
A prosecutor withheld evidence? I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
1 posted on 05/12/2009 4:00:39 PM PDT by buccaneer81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

She withheld evidence to advance her career, imo. She should do the time that the innocent victim was sentenced to.


2 posted on 05/12/2009 4:03:55 PM PDT by diefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
"It's unpardonable, and if I don't find it deliberate, I find it's at least ignorance and reckless disregard,''

Don't be a sucker, Judge, it was deliberate.

3 posted on 05/12/2009 4:07:42 PM PDT by donna (Required experience for the next Republican President: Military Service!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Baloney! Zero tolerance for prosecutors who are either incompetent or, shall I say it? — downright evil. There’s too much at risk. Too many honest people are destroyed by too many incompetent or evil prosecutors with all that power — and they have a lot of power.

I just don’t have much sympathy. Sorry. Do something else for a living, such as raking leaves in a public park.


4 posted on 05/12/2009 4:08:58 PM PDT by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

The outcome will be directly related to her political affiliation. If she is a Republican, she’ll go down. If she’s a Democrat, I don’t see much more than a hand-slap in her future. The mere mention of the story leads me to believe she’s a Republican.


5 posted on 05/12/2009 4:10:41 PM PDT by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna
If this is still Marshall, I am shocked she pursued it. Hope she slams the prosecutors butt in jail, but doubt she, especially, will do that.
6 posted on 05/12/2009 4:11:17 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: webheart

Sorry, I see it is a district court, and the judge is Wolf. I agree with the poster, being MA, her political affiliation will determine what happens.


7 posted on 05/12/2009 4:13:24 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

The judge needs to make the prosecutor hit the bricks. Maybe she can make a living defending those who choose to open carry.


8 posted on 05/12/2009 4:19:21 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Withholding evidence is as bad as perjury. It strikes at the heart of the legal system. She should lose her license to practice law and should be charged with a felony for doing so. I hope she is convicted and sentenced to hard time.


9 posted on 05/12/2009 4:21:25 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

This is just outrageous. What about the career of the man she wrongfully prosecuted? Corrupt prosecutors should get AT LEAST the same punishment they were so willing to mete out to their victims.


10 posted on 05/12/2009 4:21:43 PM PDT by LuxAerterna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

She was gonna nifong some poor schmoo to years in a Federal lock up to advance her career? Why should some trifling thing like that be allowed to impede the career of a really super special Ivy League graduate? Have we all lost our senses?


11 posted on 05/12/2009 4:22:33 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (AGWT is very robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it at the 100% confidence level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abner; Alia; beyondashadow; Bitter Bierce; bjc; Bogeygolfer; BossLady; Brytani; bwteim; Carling; ..

Sound like anyone we all know?


12 posted on 05/12/2009 4:28:53 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diefree

“She should do the time that the innocent victim was sentenced to.”

Or be required to PERSONALLY pay the legal bills of the defendant. Maybe both!


13 posted on 05/12/2009 4:36:09 PM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81; sit-rep; Squantos; Eaker

Derail her career? Hell, I want her bussing tables on the midnight shift with Nifong!


14 posted on 05/12/2009 4:38:45 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

After she does the defendant’s time, of course. That is to earn money to pay his legal bills.


15 posted on 05/12/2009 4:39:19 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
Boo-Hoo...

I have no sympathy whatsoever for this corrupt federal slug. It's way past time for some payback to the Feds for their many transgressions and corruption. And I do NOT limit this to the DoJ. It applies to the whole damned pack of needle-nosed federal leeches.

16 posted on 05/12/2009 4:40:52 PM PDT by Czar ((Still Fed Up to the Teeth with Washington))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
"But Judge Mark L. Wolf said he was considering several sanctions because he was so appalled by Sullivan's lapse and by what he characterized as a pattern of prosecutors in the US attorney's office withholding evidence."

C'mon Judge. You had already given a warning about past behavior. You should bar all the present Federal Prosecutors in your jurisdiction from practicing law in your court and tell the DOJ to send new prosecutors who have had extensive ethics training. And if the prosecutor knew from her notes that the information directly contradicted what the testimony was from the stand, she should be referred for prosecution. That's as bad a faith case as it gets.

17 posted on 05/12/2009 4:43:47 PM PDT by Enterprise (The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

She’s just one of the....can’t understand normal thinking ....little gators.


18 posted on 05/12/2009 4:45:54 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

“...was an inadvertent mistake...”

I wonder what her position would be regarding a citzen who committed an inadvertent mistake that resulted in a violation of the law, a firearms law for instance.


19 posted on 05/12/2009 4:46:44 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

I’ll take Nifong, DPD Sgt. John Shelton, and Duke Police Officer Christopher Day for $1000, abb.

:)


20 posted on 05/12/2009 4:53:58 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
why is it that those who beg for mercy, are usually the last ones to ever show any???

burn the witch...

21 posted on 05/12/2009 4:57:27 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - Obama is basically Jim Jones with a teleprompter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

That’s a start!


22 posted on 05/12/2009 4:58:16 PM PDT by Eaker (The Two Loudest Sounds in the World.....Bang When it should have been Click and the Reverse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Obama’s solution will be to fire the judge.


23 posted on 05/12/2009 5:00:58 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

“derail her career”? She should not have a career after this!


24 posted on 05/12/2009 5:12:15 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
If it were up to me I'd toss this b**** into the General Population in a mens prison for a couple of years.

L

25 posted on 05/12/2009 5:24:39 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: abb

I’ll take “Who is Mike Nifong?” for 500, abb.


26 posted on 05/12/2009 5:34:49 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
Sullivan failed to disclose that a Boston police officer's testimony at a pretrial hearing contradicted what the office had repeatedly told the prosecutor beforehand. The defendant was Darwin E. Jones, a Mattapan man who was arrested in July 2007 in a Boston gun case. The truth only came to light, according to Wolf, when the judge reviewed Sullivan's notes of her interviews of the police officer, Rance Cooley.

If I read this right, it sounds as if she, the prosecutor, told he, the police officer, to lie under oath. This would go beyond these two. I would guess there is a conspiracy here. Given the defendant's name and location in the city, he's a black man who got busted for drug possession (later in story). I'm surprised Jesse or Al were not on the job. It looks like they tried to stick a carry without permit charge on him too.

27 posted on 05/12/2009 6:40:04 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
Given the defendant's name and location in the city,

Yep. All I had to see was Mattapan.

28 posted on 05/12/2009 6:47:07 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
If I read this right, it sounds as if she, the prosecutor, told he, the police officer, to lie under oath.

Good catch. That's how I read it as well. If we had a Dept. of Justice worthy of the name, those two would be under criminal investigation.

29 posted on 05/12/2009 7:34:44 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Ha ha!


30 posted on 05/12/2009 8:33:23 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
If I read this right, it sounds as if she, the prosecutor, told he, the police officer, to lie under oath

If I remember my Law and Order correctly, subornation of perjury is something of a no no, and judges tend to frown on it?

31 posted on 05/12/2009 8:43:00 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ("men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters." -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: abb
Well, if we're keeping lists, I have one or two I'd like to add, but what the heck “rules are only meant to be broken,” right? I wonder if any of the offenders ever get that little “witness” in the pit of their stomachs that just maybe they might not oughta’ pull some of the crap they pull just to keep score of wins and losses or get the “silly” cases off their desks or get a promotion.

Leniency, huh? Hm...m...m. I'll have to think about that.

32 posted on 05/13/2009 7:03:19 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: abb
Okay, I've thought about it. No. “Sanctions” are a better deal than those I know who have been falsely arrested, prosecuted and imprisoned. Sanctions with an unsealed file and a permanent record. Yup. I'm thinking what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. She won't go to prison, but she'll live a life ruined by her own “bad choices”. She sounds young, so she'll have a long time to repent in leisure.

It isn't unforgiveness, but it is justice.

33 posted on 05/13/2009 7:10:09 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson