Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Decommissions USS Kitty Hawk
United States Navy ^ | 12 May 2009 | Navy News Service

Posted on 05/12/2009 8:07:18 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham

Navy Decommissions USS Kitty Hawk
Story Number: NNS090512-08
Release Date: 5/12/2009 5:37:00 PM

From Kitty Hawk Public Affairs

BREMERTON, Wash. (NNS) -- The aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63) was decommissioned May 12 at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard & Intermediate Maintenance Facility in Bremerton, Wash., after more than 48 years of service.

Members of the final crew lowered the ship's commissioning pennant from the main mast and the U.S. Flag and First Navy Jack from their staffs after Kitty Hawk Commanding Officer Capt. Todd Zecchin closed out the ship's deck log.

"It's hard to capture the feeling in words," said Zecchin. "This is the second aircraft carrier that I've decommissioned, and it doesn't hit you immediately until you've lowered the commissioning pennant for the last time."

Kitty Hawk's officers of the deck have used the log to track shipboard activities, both in port and at sea, since commissioning April 29, 1961.

Zecchin then transferred the ship to the control of shipyard commander Capt. Mark Whitney during a small ceremony aboard the ship.

"She has served her country for almost 50 years – 48 years and 13 days, across the globe," said Zecchin. "There have been a lot of Sailors that have crossed her decks, a lot of airmen that have flown off and on her decks."

Kitty Hawk arrived in Bremerton Sept. 2, 2008 to prepare for its eventual decommissioning. The ship spent the previous 10 years operating from Fleet Activities Yokosuka, Japan.

While operating from Japan as the Navy's only forward deployed aircraft carrier, Kitty Hawk took part in dozens of exercises and operations, including being the first aircraft carrier to take part in Operation Enduring Freedom in the Arabian Sea, and her aircraft took part in the opening strikes of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

She was replaced by USS George Washington (CVN 73), which is only the fourth U.S. aircraft carrier to be forward deployed from Yokosuka.

Kitty Hawk's voyage to Bremerton started when the ship left Fleet Activities Yokosuka, Japan, May 28, 2008. Since then, the ship made her final port visit to Guam, then on to Hawaii, where it took part in the 21st biennial Rim of the Pacific exercise with nine other nations.

On her way to Bremerton, Kitty Hawk made a final stop at Naval Air Station North Island, Calif., where she was homeported for more than 25 years. Dozens of former crewmembers, including 38 plankowners – members of the 1961 commissioning crew – rode the ship from San Diego to Bremerton on its final at-sea voyage.

The decommissioning brings back a lot of memories for the 100,000 or so Sailors who served aboard Kitty Hawk as part of ship's company or air wing.

"In January of 1965 at the young age of 17, I came on board the USS Kitty Hawk right out of boot camp," said Kitty Hawk Veterans Association President Jim Melka. "Being from a small town in Iowa, I had never seen anything so massive. The Kitty Hawk was home for me for the next 32 months. I learned a lot in those 32 months.

"The Hawk is a great ship and has been very well taken care of by our young men and women in today's Navy," he said. "I'm very proud to have served on the USS Kitty Hawk."

Plankowner Jerry Warren made Kitty Hawk's first and final at-sea voyages.

"I really felt proud to … say I served on the USS Kitty Hawk, the oldest active ship in the Navy," said Warren, the veteran's association vice president. "She will always have a place in my heart. She has been, and still is, a great ship with a lot of history behind her."

Kitty Hawk had been the Navy's oldest active warship since 1998 and turns over the title to the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN 65). Kitty Hawk was also the Navy's last remaining diesel-fueled aircraft carrier.

Throughout its lifetime, Kitty Hawk has had 407,507 arrested carrier landings and 448,235 catapult launches.

Now decommissioned, the ship will remain in Bremerton for the foreseeable future as part of the Navy Inactive Ships Program.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarriers; decommissioning; navair; sailors; usnavy; usskittyhawk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-85 next last

1 posted on 05/12/2009 8:07:18 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

The end of the Shi**y Kitty


2 posted on 05/12/2009 8:09:57 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

With The Dictator in Chief Obama we will see many more retired to the scrap yard


3 posted on 05/12/2009 8:12:55 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

yeah and I hope the “Kitty” is perserved somewhere where people can appreciate it


4 posted on 05/12/2009 8:13:38 PM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
USS Kittyhawk CV-63

5 posted on 05/12/2009 8:15:45 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lib-Lickers 2; A.A. Cunningham

Every ship I was on was sunk in a sinkex!


6 posted on 05/12/2009 8:16:11 PM PDT by RaceBannon (We have sown the wind, but we will reap the whirlwind. NObama. Not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

7 posted on 05/12/2009 8:16:55 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
Sad. I hear Enterprise is next. That will be really depressing.
8 posted on 05/12/2009 8:20:10 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Hats off to an Old Warhorse. My father deployed on her, and I was on the Halsey when we deployed with her CVBG in 1981.

Anyways, lots of memories, the least pleasant being on deck while we were following her as plane guard. Carriers have a certain stench.


9 posted on 05/12/2009 8:22:30 PM PDT by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

One of mine became scrap and the other was in a sinkex.

The sinkex is more dignified.


10 posted on 05/12/2009 8:23:58 PM PDT by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

The idea has been kicked around for a while that the Kitty Hawk should be sold to India. Here’s the logic.

China is hell bent on challenging the USN for the Pacific. However, in their rapid buildup, they have been stymied like the Russians before them in carrier design. They have purchased an old carrier from Russia to reverse engineer. However, their sights are set on the US.

India was disturbed by the Chinese buildup as well, and so also decided to build up its naval forces. In turn, this puts the squeeze on China, because it now has to look in two directions. And if the US sold India the Kitty Hawk, the Indians would leapfrog China in carrier tech. The Indians are very good at reverse engineering and shipbuilding, so in the mid-term could probably build a fleet of Kitty Hawk clones.

This would be a far greater threat to China than the USN, and force them to divert much of their military development to building far more expensive carriers than they wanted to, to be #3, instead of #2.

Meanwhile the USN would already have floating far more advanced carriers, and maintain our dominance of the Pacific while China and India fussed with each other.


11 posted on 05/12/2009 8:24:04 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Thank you for your service to your country, USS Kitty Hawk. Now, they name beautiful ships AFTER DAMNED STINKING POLITICIANS.

It makes me want to puke.


12 posted on 05/12/2009 8:29:56 PM PDT by rlmorel ("The Road to Serfdom" by F.A.Hayek - Read it...today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

MARDET USS Kitty Hawk 1985-1987.

I loved that ship.


13 posted on 05/12/2009 8:30:21 PM PDT by IGOTMINE (1911s FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Great post, how interesting. Thanks.


14 posted on 05/12/2009 8:34:27 PM PDT by MonicaG (Thank you to our military & veterans, with love & gratitude. XOXOXO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

One of the most impressive sights I’ve ever seen was when I was ten years old. In a park on the Delaware River in a crowd of people watching the Kitty Hawk passing under the Walt Whitman Bridge, heading out to sea after being launched from the New York Shipyard in Camden, NJ (I never understood the shipyards name). It was the biggest, most amazing thing I ever saw (although the gleaming white NS Savannah was cool being towed out). I never saw her again.


15 posted on 05/12/2009 8:36:23 PM PDT by Free_SJersey (Liberty can promote equality- manditory equality will kill liberty. CONSTITUTION FIRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
Throughout its lifetime, Kitty Hawk has had 407,507 arrested carrier landings and 448,235 catapult launches.

Shouldn't these numbers be roughly equal? Almost 41,000 more takeoffs than landings?

16 posted on 05/12/2009 8:42:12 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Now, they name beautiful ships AFTER DAMNED STINKING POLITICIANS.

I hear what you're saying, but I can live with USS Ronald Reagan.

17 posted on 05/12/2009 8:42:38 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mylife; A.A. Cunningham
The end of the Shi**y Kitty.

That ship was in pretty bad shape the last time on was on her 7 years ago and I have to tell you it's well past time she was put out to pasture.

18 posted on 05/12/2009 8:43:00 PM PDT by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

When carriers return to home port, the air wing is launched and arrives on shore ahead of the ship.


19 posted on 05/12/2009 8:43:45 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

2012


20 posted on 05/12/2009 8:44:56 PM PDT by My hearts in London - Everett (There is a demand today for men who can make wrong appear right. Terrence, c. 160 B.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

I remember those reports - I believe they turned out to be bogus; Someone in India put it out there because they were involved in painful negotiations with the Russians over their botched refurbishment of the Kusnetsov they were selling to India, and they wanted to make it look like there was competition.

The Kitty Hawk is too old and anyone would be insane to buy her.

Another SINKEX would be interesting. One thing I’d love to find out about but is apparently above my classification level is any info at all about the USS America SINKEX.


21 posted on 05/12/2009 8:45:00 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE; yefragetuwrabrumuy
MARDET USS Kitty Hawk 1985-1987. I loved that ship.

How'd you like waxing the Admirals passageway? [grin]

22 posted on 05/12/2009 8:45:54 PM PDT by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: My hearts in London - Everett
2012

There should always be a carrier named Enterprise in the United States Navy.

23 posted on 05/12/2009 8:46:07 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

They were calling her that when I was in the service over 20 years ago.

She served well and she served hard.

Time to rest.


24 posted on 05/12/2009 8:46:07 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

There’s going to need to be a project to name the second Ford-class carrier USS Enterprise; shouldn’t be too hard, once you get all the Trekkies involved.

Would be a tragedy to go more than a few years without an Enterprise in the fleet.


25 posted on 05/12/2009 8:46:13 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Would be a tragedy to go more than a few years without an Enterprise in the fleet.

Agree 100%!

26 posted on 05/12/2009 8:47:06 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

One of my fears is a lot of the great classic USN ship names like Ranger, Constellation, etc. will get soaked up by crappy LCSes.


27 posted on 05/12/2009 8:52:46 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Didn’t a whole mess of engineering khaki get fired about that time?


28 posted on 05/12/2009 8:58:04 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
One of my fears is a lot of the great classic USN ship names like Ranger, Constellation, etc. will get soaked up by crappy LCSes.

Yeah. I believe the first two in the class are named Freedom and Independence. The Navy obviously saw "Armageddon."

The third and fourth ships are named Fort Worth (So much for SSN city names) and Coronado.

29 posted on 05/12/2009 9:02:30 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
The idea has been kicked around for a while that the Kitty Hawk should be sold to India. Here's the logic.

The KittyHawk is almost 50 years old and needs a lot of maintenance. It is also 990' long on the waterline. The Indian Navy's largest repair dry dock at Cochin is 885' long.

"I think we are going to need a [less] bigger boat"

30 posted on 05/12/2009 9:02:50 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Obama in Office for 100 days: Wall Street panics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

A sad day for me. My last squadron in the Navy, VAQ-136, deployed aboard the Chicken Hawk.


31 posted on 05/12/2009 9:03:42 PM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
Didn’t a whole mess of engineering khaki get fired about that time?

I worked at SRF Combat Systems, Yokosuka at that time and I seem to vaguely recall that they had a problem with the gun decking of PMS in the engineering spaces and the khaki types were taking a lot of heat for it. But I don't recall anyone being fired but then I retired about that time and maybe the firings took place after I was gone.

32 posted on 05/12/2009 9:10:11 PM PDT by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

How does the air wing get back on board? Wouldn’t they fly out to the carrier after she was under way?


33 posted on 05/12/2009 9:13:42 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
Kitty Hawk.What memories.I was on board in Dec 1973 when we had a major fire that took out #1 Main Machinery Room,and I really mean took it out,there was nothing left but a big black hole.

We were en route to the P.I. at the time and were about 300 miles south of Guam when we had the fire as I recall.We could barely make way for a while and finally got up to about 9-10 kts.

We had to take the most direct route to Subic which was through San Bernadino Straits,something I don't think a carrier has done since.

When we pulled in to Subic a band from some club in Olongapo was on the pier playing "Smoke on the Water'...and that name stuck for some time.We also were called Bldg. 63 for a couple of months while the Filipino sand crabs built us a new Main Machinery Room.The liberty was great for a while,but when we finally got back underway we went to the I.O.for a long time with great ports like Mombasa to look forward to.

Ah the memories.

BTW the part about Mombasa was sarcasm.

34 posted on 05/12/2009 9:14:51 PM PDT by oldsalt (There's no such thing as a free lunch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Four of my ships have been decommed. Two were sold to foreign navies and two are sitting in mothballs. A sinkex would probably be more dignified than this:


35 posted on 05/12/2009 9:16:06 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Free_SJersey
(although the gleaming white NS Savannah was cool being towed out). I never saw her again.

She's just down the road a bit in Baltimore now.

Beautiful ship.

36 posted on 05/12/2009 9:16:19 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

Ping. I remember the Kitty Hawk relieving the Ranger battle group in the Indian Ocean in 1993.


37 posted on 05/12/2009 9:16:22 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
How does the air wing get back on board? Wouldn’t they fly out to the carrier after she was under way?

Good point. I hadn't considered that. I thought, though, that I had seen some aircraft put on carriers with cranes. I may be wrong, though.

38 posted on 05/12/2009 9:19:26 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

red x’s are horrible not dignified!!

LOL!

The Lamoure County was sunk after beaching herself in Agentina

The Belleau Wood was sunk

The Okinawa was sunk, but I think that was demo charges

I never found anythig on the Pensacola

I swear, FEMA should have taken over the LPH’s and LPD’s for hurricane relief, ya know??


39 posted on 05/12/2009 9:21:16 PM PDT by RaceBannon (We have sown the wind, but we will reap the whirlwind. NObama. Not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: oldsalt

Thanks for that account oldsalt, and your service! :^)


40 posted on 05/12/2009 9:21:53 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE

guarding nukes or Air Wing?


41 posted on 05/12/2009 9:22:48 PM PDT by RaceBannon (We have sown the wind, but we will reap the whirlwind. NObama. Not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

like they said, many land on land, too after takeoff, not all come back

as for craning them on board, there are only a few, usually only those that dont fly or dont have pilots assigned, and even then, they can do hops and fly ne in and fly out on a passenger type


42 posted on 05/12/2009 9:28:26 PM PDT by RaceBannon (We have sown the wind, but we will reap the whirlwind. NObama. Not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

I’m sure the Indian government would love to have that ship.Or maybe one of our other allied countries.


43 posted on 05/12/2009 9:28:52 PM PDT by puppypusher (The world is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

you are a hero dude


44 posted on 05/12/2009 9:28:56 PM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lib-Lickers 2

huh?

I never did anything that any other man would do, what makes me a hero??


45 posted on 05/12/2009 9:30:46 PM PDT by RaceBannon (We have sown the wind, but we will reap the whirlwind. NObama. Not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
There’s going to need to be a project to name the second Ford-class carrier USS Enterprise; shouldn’t be too hard, once you get all the Trekkies involved.

If only Capt. Kirk had expressed some anti-abortion thoughts during an episode.

46 posted on 05/12/2009 9:32:31 PM PDT by LZ_Bayonet (There's Always Something.............And there's always something worse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
I agree completely. However, I think it likely that the future of attack aircraft carriers is limited. The next generation of warships will be configured for UCAVs (robot drones), not manned aircraft, and will likely be smaller and cheaper.

That's assuming the U.S. Navy survives until 2012, and that the United States is still an independent country.

As for Enterprise, I just hope they make her a museum ship or sink her instead of letting the Chinese Commies have her. The thought of those filthy bastards running their bloody hands over my ship makes my skin crawl. Better a watery grave than that.

B-chan
Former MM3
USS ENTERPRISE (CVN-65)
GONAVY

47 posted on 05/12/2009 9:33:18 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Yeah it worked on preview. It was a pic of St Louis (LKA-116) in mothballs at West Loch in Pearl Harbor.


48 posted on 05/12/2009 9:38:06 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Doofer,

Did you ever go to the instrument repair shop on the Kitty Hawk? I understand it was right under the steam catapult and noisy as h*ll! My brother was there about 10 years back. Just curious...

17th Miss Regt.


49 posted on 05/12/2009 9:38:10 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
That's assuming the U.S. Navy survives until 2012, and that the United States is still an independent country. As for Enterprise, I just hope they make her a museum ship or sink her instead of letting the Chinese Commies have her. The thought of those filthy bastards running their bloody hands over my ship makes my skin crawl. Better a watery grave than that.

I agree on all points.

50 posted on 05/12/2009 9:38:41 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson