Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: scripter
What part of "no gay gene" do you not understand? For there to be a genetic component at all ... there's got to be a gene.

To say there is "no gay gene" says that homosexuality has no genetic component. It cannot be otherwise.

This is simple stuff, FRiend. Mr. Unruh and Dr. Byrd are saying something quite direct. You seem to want to avoid that. Why?

88 posted on 05/13/2009 10:03:25 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
To say there is "no gay gene" says that homosexuality has no genetic component. It cannot be otherwise.

Um... no. But the above comment certainly explains your confusion.

89 posted on 05/13/2009 10:12:27 AM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson