Skip to comments.Savage appeals to Hillary to have Brits remove his name from 'unwanted list'
Posted on 05/13/2009 3:17:44 PM PDT by dynachrome
On behalf of Michael Savage, the Thomas More Law Center respectfully demands that you call upon the government of the United Kingdom ... (link brings up the letter)
(Excerpt) Read more at michaelsavage.wnd.com ...
“The Letter” (not by the Boxtops!)
I wonder if she will assist Savage. If she does this, I will respect her one percent which is one percent more than now.
The bottom line is that the `Home Secretary` was kissing up to Radical Muzzys, and covering for her own scandals. I don’t think anything will happen unril Brown is forced to call new elections, ahead of time, and Cameron comes in, removes Savage’s name and restores some dignity to Britian.
Since it is the right thing to do, I would have to be suprised if she even thought about it.
Good move on Savage’s part. Leaves hildabeast to decide what “hate speech” is or is not. (of course, no such ting exists except in the eyes of the beholder)
Hope so. Won't get any help for the Marxist Media though. Clinton my not move unless she feels the heat, and she certainly won't get any public attention from the Myopic Media.
However,the next time some alien member of the Religion of Pieces is caught in some Liverpool basement plotting the destruction of London's Underground you can take out a full page ad in the London Telegraph asking why he was allowed to be there and you're not.
I like Savage, but I think he is flipping his lid asking help from the rats.
That never occurred to me but I wouldn't put it past Hussein for a minute! I'd wager that you're absolutely correct.
That would be a hoot.
That would be fun. How ‘bout Cong. Trancredo?
What does he have to lose. He's not exactly getting help from the Republicans. As usual, the gutless wonders refuse to speak out on behalf of a conservative. If they think this moderate crap is going to get them elected in the future, then I guess they haven't figured out why we are currently under one party rule.
just did a quick errand in the car and heard Savage quote from a decision handed down from the European Court of Human Rights which seems to overrule the UK’s decision. Sounds interesting to me.
I dislike using foreign courts of law.
I hear ya.But to overturn the decision of a European government it's probably wisest to use rulings of European courts as ammunition.
I’ll say it here too. He’s very smart, or his lawyers are.
Heres my take. She is now consulting with her lawyers about it. They are the old clinton crew and they wont go for it, but she will respond in a letter and in public that her lawyers advised her yada, yada, yada. No way in hell will she change her MO for anyone on the right, especially Savage, even if shes not seeing the trees through the forest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.