Posted on 05/14/2009 4:56:49 PM PDT by wagglebee
EDINBURGH, Scotland, May 14, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A ringleader of a pedophile ring unveiled in Scotland was a top advisor to the Scottish Executive on homosexual issues regarding children, reports the Daily Mail.
LifeSiteNews.com reported Monday that James Rennie, the 38-year-old chief executive of LGBT Youth Scotland, was found guilty this month of molesting for four years an infant - beginning when the infant was 3-months-old - whom friends left with Rennie to babysit.
Rennie, who resigned from his position at LGBT Youth following his arrest late last year, lobbied for homosexual issues in the Scottish parliament, and has visited with the Prime Minister of England as "the Executive's most important and influential adviser on gay issues affecting children," according to the Daily Mail.
Among other issues, the group lobbied for adoption to homosexual couples under Rennie's leadership.
Rennie and fellow homosexual activist Neil Strachan, who was found guilty of assaulting an 18-month-old boy he was babysitting on New Year's Eve 2005, are facing maximum sentences of life in prison as the ringleaders of an extensive network of pedophiles.
The two men shared victims and images of the abuse with six other men found guilty in the bust. The group was found guilty last week of over 50 charges, including sex attacks on children, conspiring to abuse children, and possessing and distributing child pornography.
See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
Chief Executive of Homosexual Group Found Guilty of Involvement in Pedophile Ring
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/may/09051113.html
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Sadly, this is not surprising.
Though, there are those, here on FR, who think there is no evidence of this kind of thing happening.
Rule 303 must be applied!
There is no link to perversion from homosexuality.
Or, so we have been told......
Huh?
Kill him.
This is certainly the very picture of “ulterior motive”!
That’s because they’re so entertaining in sitcoms.
“There is no link to perversion from homosexuality.”
As you indicated this is their claim. However the pedophile and gay activists were working together in the early 70s. The gays decided to seperate themselves publically.
But they still push for lowering the age of consent and teaching young children to be gay.
Did you realize that Eric Holder selected and Obama appointed people to the top level management positions in Department of Justice who would NOT be allowed in the White House with the children around?
As I have stated many times, the direct connection between homosexual pedophiles (ie pederasty) is a part of the “gay lifestyle” and will gradually be exposed from behind the closet door.
Lest we forget, there are hundreds of millions of ‘paedophiles’ in every Country of the World, masquerading under a ‘religious’ (I use the term loosely) banner, abusing young girls whilst carrying out the established, and Western Government accepted processes of their tyrannical ‘cult’.
Yep they think that movies featuring the crotches of 8 year old girls is NOT child porn.
I don’t see the problem.
Let’s analyze it:
You pick someone who is homosexual to advise you on policy in relation to children and homosexuality.
That person is promoting the homosexuality in all forms including influencing children to be homosexual.
So now you are gobsmacked to find out he is acting out his homosexuality with children?
Are these the same people that would drop a bowling ball off a tall building and be surprised when it hit the ground?
Which disorder is worse, Liberalism or Homosexuality?
It would be very interesting to make a list of exactly which policy positions this child abuser supported while he was “just a LGBT activist,” especially with regard to age of consent and adoption laws.
Is there a public record available?
As for Obama and Holder, the depravity with which they have surrounded themselves gags me.
How much longer are we going to tolerate this filth? When do we stand up and say, “NO.” These are not alternate and acceptable lifestyles. These behaviors are perverted, corrosive, and evil.
“These behaviors are perverted, corrosive, and evil. “
IMHO it is the fundamental reason the Greek and Roman empires fell.
I don’t know of anywhere on FR or anywhere else who claims “there is no evidence of this kind of thing happening”. But there is plenty of this kind of thing being perpetrated by heterosexual men on little girls as well. Whether the percent of homosexual men who sexually assault children is higher than the percent of heterosexual men who sexually assault children is unclear (though it may very well be higher). What is very clear is that the majority of young children who are sexually assaulted are girls assaulted by men. The child pornography/child prostitution industry is very disproportionately focused on girls — not surprisingly, since over 90% of adult men are exclusively or predominately heterosexual.
The group to focus on if you want to keep children safe from sexual assault is *men*. Women, regardless of their sexual orientation, are statistically very unlikely to commit sexual assault on a child (or on an adult). Within the large category of “men”, the next layer of focus should be men who show a specific interest in children in general (as opposed to children of their own). Male elementary school teachers, church youth group leaders, volunteers for groups like Big Brothers, men who befriend the fatherless sons of neighbors, men who give private music lessons, men who teach sports classes or coach sports teams, male counselors or psychologists whose practice is focused on children, etc. And, of course, as the above example shows, men who frequently volunteer to babysit other people’s children, and men who hold jobs that focus on children in any way, thus providing cover for their spending a lot of time around children.
While your comments are quite logical, I hope you realize you are tarring by implication a very large number of perfectly innocent men who have careers or hobbies that keep them around children.
While it is quite true that men who lust after children often get involved with such things, I believe the vast majority of the men who do so are not pedophiles.
It is equally true that firebugs often become professional or volunteer fireman, but that doesn’t mean all firefighters should be suspected of sexual kinks involving the setting of fires.
The vast majority of homosexual men are not pedophiles either. It may be that a higher percentage of homosexual men are pedophiles, than of heterosexual men, but it’s still a small minority. People need to be vigilant around ALL men, and look for the markers that identify pedophiles, rather than imagining that evidence of homosexuality (proclaimed or closeted) is a key marker of pedophilia. I think it’s often easier for heterosexual pedophiles to go undetected, in large part because they tend to have appearance and manner that’s basically identical to the majority of men (i.e. heterosexual men), that the majority of men and women instinctively feel at ease with them.
It’s just a statistical/biological fact that sexual predators (of both adults and children) are overwhelmingly male. Directing focus to that fact isn’t “tarring” anyone, it’s just correct information which is more likely to help intercept a predator before he assaults his next victim, than focusing on “politically correct” notions that say we shouldn’t “profile” people. We *should* profile people, and we should profile them according to the best available factual information. This is equally true whether we’re talking about trying to protect our children from sexual assault, or trying to prevent our passenger planes from being hijacked and used as bombs.
Or, so we have been told......
Tell that to the victims of abuse by Catholic priests, virtually all of which was homosexual abuse.
Geesh. If looking at runway models (male and female) is any indication.......there ya’ go. They all look like 10-year-olds, emaciated and pale, with pouty lips.
Read it again....
The vast majority of homosexual men are not pedophiles either.””
Not true. The vast majority of male homosexuals are in fact, pederasts. More than 90% of male homos were in fact molested as children by adult male homos. This has been a common practice in the San Fran area since the 60s. It is a part of the lifestyle that yet remains in the closet. Male homosexuals even have an international organization called NAMBLA—which even had members participant in the “Gay Pride Parades.” It has been completely acceptable until the recent past when the normal community objected to this part of the deviant lifestyle choice.
That’s utter nonsense. No way are 90% of even the visible flamboyant flaunters in San Francisco pedophiles, and no way have more than a small minority of adult male homosexuals been molested when they were children (and certainly quite a few adult heterosexaul males were molested as children). Try to remember that most homosexual men aren’t running around obscenely dressed and flaunting their sexual activities in public like the crazy San Francisco crowd — that’s just a very visible subset of the male homosexual community. Many are living pretty ordinary lives, including some who are monogamous and many who are no more promiscuous than the average heterosexual in our society. And many of the ones with clearly bizarre and unhealthy sexual lifestyles aren’t into young boys, e.g. former US Senator and longtime NRA board member Larry Craig — married over 25 years, and running around public restrooms soliciting adult male strangers for sex — that’s a very common profile for adult male homosexuals.
No it isn’t nonsense. Several of the male homosexuals that infiltrated the Catholic priesthood molested more than 100 boys—they admitted to it. It is common practice in the homosexual community. “living pretty ordinary lives”” give me a break. Consuming fecal material during rimming and felching procedures may be ordinary to you, but not to normal people. You need to read up on the #1 vector for the spread of infectious diseases—male homosexuals. Male homosexuals have the highest incidence of HIV/AIDS, syphilis, drug-resistant gonorrhea, entamoeba histolytica, chlamydia, herpes simplex II, Chancroid, Drug Resistant TB, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis non A & B, just to name a few. The press of course never discusses the CDC facts, but if you want to look for yourself the information is in the scientific literature. More than any other segment of society, the homosexuals are costing us billions in medical care.
That has nothing to do with your preposterous claim that 90% of all homosexual men are pedophiles. The Catholic priesthood is especially attractive to male homosexuals who want to have sex with young boys, because it gives them easy access to young boys. There's no shortage of heterosexual men who sexually abuse young girls, and they also tend to seek employment and/or volunteer opportunities in settings that give them regular access to a lot of children. There's a huge industry of child prostitution and child porn, and it's predominantly using girls, simply because there are more heterosexual men in the world, than homosexual men. You could easily find a group of men who'd admit to having molested over 100 little girls, but that wouldn't be evidence that most heterosexual men are pedophiles.
Do you understand the concept of “incidence” of occurrence? Male homosexuals are perhaps 2-3% of the total population. Figure it out. Yes, pederasty is a part of the “gay” lifestyle. Have you heard of Nambla? The only international organization devoted to the sodomization of children on the planet.
NAMBLA is a drop in the bucket compared the size of commercial child prostitution and pornography operations around the world. NAMBLA publically positions itself as a political activist group, and has managed to convince you it’s got significant numbers and clout, but it’s really a very small outfit that’s very unwelcome in most of the gay/lesbian/etc community. Reliable statistics are hard to come by, and though they strongly suggest that a significantly higher percentage of all homosexual adult males, than of all heterosexual adult males, abuse children, your claim that “90% of homosexual men” sexually abuse boys is totally off the wall and unsupported by any evidence at all.
Where are your nambla figures suggesting it is a “drop in the bucket.” Nambla members have participated in “pride parades” across the world. They are now unpopular and homosexuals—for fear of retribution from the public show of this part of their lifestyle choice—have attempted to distance themselves. Having lived in the Bay area of San Fran for 6 years I witnessed the practice of male homosexuals molesting boys for years. It has been quite common since the late 60s and was once openly discussed. It is now back in the closet hidden from public view, much like the rimming and felching practices of the “gay” lifestyle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.