Posted on 05/15/2009 5:06:32 AM PDT by conservativegramma
Libs don’t want to acknowledge the existance of standards (especially biblical, unappealable, unchanging standards),
so they use the failings of sinners as examples of why standards are invalid.
Talk about a clusterf-—!!
There, I fixed it for ya!
I’m no Dobson fan, but he’s absolutely correct on this...
The sheeple are still stunned, and they can’t quite figure out what is going on, yet. When they do, it’s going to get really ugly.
“The hypocrisy of the left is pretty brazen!”
Who’s going to call them on it?
CERTAINLY not our media, for whom ISSUE NUMBER ONE is gay “Civil Rights”. Because it effects most of them PERSONALLY...
“Gay rights” is not about affecting them personally, not in the big picture.
It’s about destroying the traditional family - the institution God created.
Something wicked this way comes.
Obama is just a result of what you see walking down the street these days.Kids with their pants hanging below their crotch,face full of piercings,stringy dreads ,tribal art tattoos,and a stupid expression.Wait a minute,those aren’t kids,those are the PARENTS!!
“Gay rights” is not about affecting them personally, not in the big picture. It’s about destroying the traditional family - the institution God created.”
Not really, not for them.
I’m associated with several local media types. The Talking heads run about 30% gay, but the ones BEHIND the cameras are about 60% gay.
At one local Indy TV Station, it’s a Mafia. They will not even HIRE non-gays for back-end jobs! Gays got in management several years ago, started hiring other gays, and that same story is repeated all across the landscape of American Media now.
It’s not about destroying the family for them, it’s about cutting down and minimalizing what they see to be a personal enemy to them, and thier chosen lifestyle.
I'm sure this was unintentional on your part...
This is a sincere question on my part because I do not know the answer:
If Congress passes this law, why do individual states have to follow it? Aren’t these kinds of laws the decision of individual states (10th amendment) rather than the Federal Government’s?
Thank you.
These kinds of laws should be the domain of individual states. Unfortunately the fed govt. has become a monster. Totally out of control and still growing. This is the main reason for the tea parties, and is the #1 reason behind the state sovereignty movement.
Thank you.
When states start to exercise their state sovereignty, all these laws imposed by the Federal Government should be going out the window.
No argument with Dobson on this one. There IS evil coming out of Washington, and it’s source is the White House.
That's unless "the evidence relates to that offense," he said.
And under existing federal law, someone who "induces" a crime can be tried, convicted and sentenced as the principal. He said that leaves open pastors and Christians to be prosecuted should someone who commits a crime claim to have heard them speaking against homosexuality.
If this passes we can commit hate crimes against gay marriages and state that we did it because 0bama was against it. They would then have to press charges against zer0.
In King's novel the "good" folks were liberals and free thinkers. People with analytical minds like engineers and scientists went to the dark side.
True enough. It is after all, fiction. When you’re the writer you get to determine who’s a winner and loser.
Agree with Dobson on this one. It is incredible to see where our country is going.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.