Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Menu labeling bill introduced by U.S. lawmakers (Harkin, DeLauro)
Los Angeles Times ^ | May 16, 2009 | Jerry Hirsch

Posted on 05/19/2009 12:06:36 PM PDT by reaganaut1

Two federal lawmakers have introduced legislation to require fast-food and other chain restaurants to post calories on menu boards and food display tags. The chains also would have to put information about calories, fats, carbohydrates and salt on printed menus.

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) on Thursday introduced the Menu Education and Labeling Act, called the MEAL Act for short. They said it would help consumers make more informed choices about the nutritional content of the food they are ordering.

The bill has the support of many consumer and health groups and emulates legislation signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in September that requires chain restaurants in California to display calorie counts with each menu item. That was the nation's first state law of its kind; it won the support of the California Restaurant Assn. because it standardized requirements and preempted ordinances in Santa Clara and San Francisco.

Health advocates believe that when people see the amount of calories, fat and salt in meals before they order them, they will gravitate to more healthful selections.

"Consumers play an impossible guessing game trying to make healthier choices in restaurants," said Margo Wootan, nutrition policy director for the Center for Science in the Public Interest. "Who would guess that a large chocolate shake at McDonald's has more calories than two Big Macs or that a multigrain bagel at Dunkin' Donuts has 140 more calories than a jelly doughnut?"

The restaurant industry is pushing a competing bill. The Labeling Education and Nutrition Act, nicknamed the LEAN Act, would require chains with more than 20 units to post calorie counts. It also would nullify state and local measures now in effect and preempt future regional measures.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; calories; nannystate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: reaganaut1

I’m against a law requiring this, but I sure would enjoy it if more restaurants did this voluntarily. I avoid a lot of places because unless I go searching around on the internet, I don’t have any idea how many calories there are in the meal. It would be awesome to have that right there on the menu. But, once again, it’s not the government’s responsibility to require something like that. Should be up to the businesses themselves.


21 posted on 05/19/2009 12:22:29 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

MMMMmmmm....milkshake....maybe that’s what I’ll have for lunch....instead of something healthy!


22 posted on 05/19/2009 12:22:40 PM PDT by goodnesswins (WE have a REPUBLIC.....IF we can KEEP IT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

This is such a lie.
Just about every fast food or restaurant we eat at will gladly give you the nutritional information off their website as a .pdf or excel spreadsheet.
I wish a creative Republican would put an amendment into this bill that the charges for increased food prices from menu changes will be paid for from the salaries of Democratic House Leadership.


23 posted on 05/19/2009 12:23:09 PM PDT by WoodstockCat (General Honore: "The storm gets a vote... We're not stuck on stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Actually I favor this bill. This isn't an issue of the government regulating what is sold or for how much. This is government ensuring that people have a reasonable ability to make smart decisions. The costs to the food industry are minimal and the ability for people to eat healthier worth quite a lot.

I know I would like to know how many calories are in meals at places I go to. Sure, I could usually look it up on-line before I go for some places but how often will I do that? And many places don't offer that But when I go to Olive Garden or Outback I'd like to be able to have a menu that tells me exactly what it is I'm consuming.

Using government to help people empower themselves is, IMO, a legitimate use. It's when the government starts making those choices or pushing people one way or the other that bothers me.

We still like the FDA to make sure our meat is safe right? And to inspect the facilities food is processed/stored at right? There is little difference here.

24 posted on 05/19/2009 12:23:35 PM PDT by AirForceGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

How did the citizenry survive before the government controlled every aspect of their lives? How will the citizenry survive when the air we breathe is taxed for our own good?


25 posted on 05/19/2009 12:25:02 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

Control.


26 posted on 05/19/2009 12:25:31 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Harkin labeled himself as a moron years ago.
27 posted on 05/19/2009 12:25:38 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“This is not the business of the federal government.”

And when did that ever stop the government.


28 posted on 05/19/2009 12:25:58 PM PDT by edcoil (IF CA rolls pollution standards back to 1990 levels, lets roll CA spending back as well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

What a waste of their time and OUR money.


29 posted on 05/19/2009 12:26:50 PM PDT by malia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
It’s all part of the bread a circuses act.

Stop right there! Your post has a food reference and I see no calorie information whatsoever. You are hereby fined $500.

30 posted on 05/19/2009 12:27:47 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (May God save America from its government; this is no time for Obamateurs. Emmanuel = Haldeman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
what happened to “the worst economy since the Great Depression” mantra these birdbrains rammed down our throats, now they want business costs to go through the roof, do they think we won’t end up paying more???

Right and what ever happened to "it's the economy stupid"? The economy is in the toilet and the democrats in Washington are doing everything they can to make the cost of doing business higher.

31 posted on 05/19/2009 12:29:30 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedys float, Mary Jos don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

How does the federal govt have power over McDonalds?

They dont get federal money. Only the states or cities can make these laws


32 posted on 05/19/2009 12:31:05 PM PDT by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TPluth
Although I'm not sure this is a good idea (I think food labeling is an important and useful tool, but I'm skeptical of imposing the costs of reprinting signage/menus/etc in what is already a fairly bleak economic situation for the restaurant industry), I don't there is any Constitutional problem with this law. Limited, as it is, to large chain restaurants (which have stores in multiple states), this law appears to be a fairly clear exercise of the Federal power to regulate interstate commerce (and not even just under the current, strained, post-Wickard reasoning, but under a reasonable reading of the plain language of the interstate commerce clause).

It might not be a wise exercise of Federal power, but it is not an unconstitutional exercise of Federal power.

33 posted on 05/19/2009 12:31:10 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The BK quadstacker. 1000 delicious calories of Meat, cheese and bacon (libs hate it).


34 posted on 05/19/2009 12:39:27 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I agree, I already have two parents.....I don’t need anymore.


35 posted on 05/19/2009 12:42:24 PM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AirForceGeorge

This sort of regulation is something that should happen (and does) on the state and local level.

To quote the 10th ammendment:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”


36 posted on 05/19/2009 12:44:39 PM PDT by linbiao123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: linbiao123

You cannot expect a document written over two centuries ago to really be applicable in the modern world, do you.


37 posted on 05/19/2009 12:49:49 PM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

They want it in bigger letters that some people can’t read in English or other wise.


38 posted on 05/19/2009 12:51:40 PM PDT by handy old one (It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotlme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Health advocates believe that when people see the amount of calories, fat and salt in meals before they order them, they will gravitate to more healthful selections.

Baloney.

39 posted on 05/19/2009 12:53:44 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Besides, the action is incomplete. They should be required to label gluten content as well.

I'll send that to Barnie ~ he's sensitive to issues affecting colons.

40 posted on 05/19/2009 1:02:30 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson