Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missouri stimulus money to expand unemployment benefits in trouble
Kansas City Red Star ^ | May 19, 2009 | STEVE KRASKE and DAVID KLEPPER

Posted on 05/21/2009 6:05:17 PM PDT by MissouriConservative

An end-of-session attempt in Jefferson City to snare $133 million in federal stimulus money for expanding unemployment benefits has hit an unanticipated snag.

The U.S. Labor Department said Tuesday that the wording of the legislation made Missouri ineligible to receive the federal dollars.

“Missouri’s law regarding their (unemployment insurance) changes would deem them ineligible for UI Modernization funds as passed,” a spokeswoman for the Labor Department wrote The Kansas City Star in an e-mail.

*****

Unlike their counterparts in Missouri, Kansas lawmakers intentionally made the changes permanent to meet the federal requirements for stimulus money.

State Rep. Raj Goyle, a Wichita Democrat who sponsored the legislation, said lawmakers understood that they would only get the stimulus money if the changes were made permanent. He said federal officials had given the new Kansas law an initial review and found no problems with it.

“From all I understand we’re good to go,” Goyle said.

In Missouri, the General Assembly’s effort to expand eligibility for jobless benefits was intentionally made temporary. The federal government is insisting that the change be permanent so that more jobless people quality for more benefits.

Missouri’s legislation would automatically halt the expanded job benefits after the federal money was spent.

State Rep. John Burnett, a Kansas City Democrat, said the decision to make the eligibility expansion temporary was part of a deal to win Republican support. Burnett, a member of the House labor committee, said he supported the move.

“That’s good public policy,” Burnett said. “In really bad economic times, we expand our unemployment benefits. When unemployment goes down, we don’t need to expand.”

(Excerpt) Read more at kansascity.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Kansas; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/21/2009 6:05:17 PM PDT by MissouriConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

Kansas bent over and grabbed their ankles to get the federal money.

At least Missouri put the provision in there to halt the payments after the federal money runs out. Not a great thing as they still went for the money but at least they had some common sense to make it temporary so that when the federal money runs out, Missouri isn’t on the hook forever.


2 posted on 05/21/2009 6:06:44 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (Let the purging of the RINOs begin in 2010. - MissouriConservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
In Missouri, the General Assembly’s effort to expand eligibility for jobless benefits was intentionally made temporary.

EXTORTION!

FEDS are saying, "Make your laws the way we TELL you too, or you get none of the money your taxpayers are required to repay!

3 posted on 05/21/2009 6:09:19 PM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
The Feds act just like heroin dealers. They give you some free samples to get you addicted and then cut you off. So there you are broke and addicted.

Maybe Missouri should start robbing Federal Banks to feed their new addiction.
4 posted on 05/21/2009 6:09:57 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

In New York another extension of Unemployment Benefits was announced by Governor Patterson-it is now possible to receive up to 72 weeks of benefits, 26 regular weeks and 46 weeks of extended.


5 posted on 05/21/2009 6:11:53 PM PDT by Larry381 ("in the final instance civilization is always saved by a platoon of soldiers" Oswald Spengler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Okay, so those in unemployment get a few extra weeks. How will this develope new businesses, products or services?


6 posted on 05/21/2009 6:51:13 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Yep. I hope Missouri keeps the law the same, no more unemployment after the feds money runs out.

What I’d rather would happen is that Missouri would scrap this law and, in the most public way possible, give the middle finger to Zero and his little stooges Pelosi and Reid.

Hey, I can dream can’t I?


7 posted on 05/21/2009 7:04:56 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (Let the purging of the RINOs begin in 2010. - MissouriConservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Larry381

72 weeks????? OMG. Over a year of sitting on your brains and living off of the taxpayer’s dime.


8 posted on 05/21/2009 7:05:43 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (Let the purging of the RINOs begin in 2010. - MissouriConservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
An end-of-session attempt in Jefferson City to snare $133 million in federal stimulus money for expanding unemployment benefits has hit an unanticipated snag. The U.S. Labor Department said Tuesday that the wording of the legislation made Missouri ineligible to receive the federal dollars.

9 posted on 05/21/2009 7:19:28 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
Its a horrible waste of money. Can you imagine a system where all you have to do is quit and claim it was due to family illness or domestic abuse and you get a year long paid vacation at the expense of the employer. What a crock.
10 posted on 05/21/2009 7:43:35 PM PDT by BOBWADE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

It would be bettter if Missouri sued the Feds (if the Feds allow that), claiming discrimination or equal protection or somesuch.


11 posted on 05/21/2009 9:28:38 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("Do you call it 'unsound method'?" "No method at all," I murmured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson