Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

La. Supreme Court rejects hospitalís appeal in nurseís rights of conscience lawsuit
Alliance Defense Fund ^ | May 20, 2009

Posted on 05/22/2009 3:30:45 AM PDT by Man50D

The Louisiana Supreme Court Friday declined to hear an appeal by St. Tammany Parish Hospital in a nurse’s lawsuit filed by ADF attorneys and an ADF-allied attorney. A trial judge had ruled against issuing summary judgment in favor of the hospital, so that decision will stand. The nurse, Toni Lemly, sued the hospital in 2005 after it refused to grant a reasonable accommodation for her religious beliefs.

“Pro-life medical personnel shouldn’t be penalized for their beliefs,” said ADF-allied attorney Brian Arabie of Lake Charles. “The hospital acted unlawfully when it refused to make a reasonable accommodation for Ms. Lemly and instead terminated her full-time position.”

Lemly informed hospital staff that she objected to administering the “morning after” abortion pill because of her religious beliefs. In response, St. Tammany Parish Hospital fired Lemly from her full-time position and reduced her to part-time status, working only three days a week. Her demotion resulted in a significant reduction in pay and the loss of employee benefits. The hospital declined several reasonable suggestions made by Lemly, a nurse for 23 years, that would have enabled the facility to continue administering the pill while allowing her to abstain from dispensing it herself. The hospital chose not to act on any of her suggestions.

The lawsuit, Lemly v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital District No. 1, was filed in the 22nd Judicial District Court for the Parish of St. Tammany in June 2005. The court denied the hospital’s motion for summary judgment in January 2007.

“Toni provided St. Tammany Parish Hospital with options that would have accommodated both her full-time position and their wish to distribute the morning-after abortion pill,” Arabie said. “Instead, the hospital chose to engage in discrimination based on her courageous commitment to the unborn. We are hopeful that the hospital will change course, do what’s right for a dedicated nurse and her constitutional rights, and discontinue the need for any further litigation.”

H.B. 517, a bill that would protect health care providers’ rights of conscience, passed the Louisiana House of Representatives Tuesday and now goes to the Senate. Also awaiting Senate approval, after overwhelming approval by the House, is H.B. 340, a constitutional amendment that would protect religious liberty rights from violation by the government.

• Opposition to application for writ of review filed on behalf of Toni Lemly • Writ denial issued by the Louisiana Supreme Court


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; louisiana; morningafterpill; nurse; prolife

1 posted on 05/22/2009 3:30:45 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Wonder why I haven’t heard about this in the local news?


2 posted on 05/22/2009 3:42:05 AM PDT by chemicalman ("There's a sucker born every minute", PTB, "They all voted for Obama", CM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Ping - Supreme Court Denial to hear case regarding nurse who objected to distributing the morning after abortion pill, and was basically fired (demoted to Part-time and lost benefits).


3 posted on 05/22/2009 3:56:01 AM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I should’ve stated the Louisiana Supreme Court, so as not to confuse this with the SCOTUS. :)


4 posted on 05/22/2009 3:56:59 AM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The war is being waged still, we have not lost...keep on fighting!


5 posted on 05/22/2009 3:58:26 AM PDT by Wpin (I do not regret my admiration for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
“Also awaiting Senate approval, after overwhelming approval by the House, is H.B. 340, a constitutional amendment that would protect religious liberty rights from violation by the government”

I'm having trouble remembering, but didn't we as a nation already take some sort of action that guaranteed religious freedom. Hmmm, darn that public education I received, just having a heck of a time trying to recall...

6 posted on 05/22/2009 4:03:31 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (The most dangerous fascists are those with a warm smile and soothing voice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
The lawsuit, Lemly v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital District No. 1, was filed in the 22nd Judicial District Court for the Parish of St. Tammany in June 2005. The court denied the hospital’s motion for summary judgment in January 2007.

This article is confusing. So now (2009) the court has denied the appeal of the denial of summary judgment (2007) of a case filed in 2005.....so now the case can proceed to trial?

7 posted on 05/22/2009 4:38:12 AM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The problem here is that, even if the nurse is ultimately successful, the hospital will create another reason to fire her.

I hope she gets enough $$$$ to retire on.


8 posted on 05/22/2009 4:43:20 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

“a constitutional amendment that would protect religious liberty rights from violation by the government”

A great majority will protest when these laws allow Muslims to request and and are granted Sharia law. When will politicians learn to quit messing with the Constitution.


9 posted on 05/22/2009 5:45:08 AM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (Support the 10th. Ammendment and become a Neo-terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson