Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nelson On Sotomayor: 'I Look Forward To Learning More'
TPM (Talking Points Memo)DC ^ | 5/26/2009 | Brian Beutler

Posted on 05/26/2009 2:34:22 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross

Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE)--who's been giving Barack Obama a tough time of late--has released a statement on the Sotomayor nomination. "President Obama is to be commended for selecting a nominee with a significant breadth and depth of legal experience to replace retiring Justice David Souter," Nelson says, "I look forward to learning more about Judge Sonia Sotomayor's background, record and qualifications -- and to meeting with her to discuss her judicial philosophy -- as this important United States Supreme Court nomination moves forward."

Nelson supported both of George W. Bush's Supreme Court nominees, and gave the previous President wide latitude on judicial and executive nominations in general. But in recent weeks he's become a key obstacle to the confirmation of Dawn Johnsen, who Obama nominated to head the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel months ago. (snip)

As Nebraska's senator since 2001, I have voted on numerous judicial nominees. In each case, I nominated or supported judicial nominees who convinced me they would follow the law, rather than manipulate the law to promote an activist agenda. While my personal views differed from some nominees, I applied no litmus test to them on issues. My main test has always been and remains: Will the nominee follow the law and not make law to fit his or her views?

(Excerpt) Read more at tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: 111th; bennelson; nelson; scotus; sotomayor
Ben Nelson (D-NE) seems better on judges (fingers crossed) than many GOP senators.
1 posted on 05/26/2009 2:34:22 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

It’s really not that difficult, Ben.

Just read a couple of her quotes and you’ve got your answer . . . N O


2 posted on 05/26/2009 2:36:05 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Two current comments on the article at the site. One stands out for its pure ignorance. I mean really - why should a judge follow the law?! That IS pure 'right-wing' code speak. /s

"Is Nelson a Republibot? I mean what frickin' democrat ever says: "In each case, I nominated or supported judicial nominees who convinced me they would follow the law, rather than manipulate the law to promote an activist agenda." Every senator is entitled to their opinion about how to confirm a judge but this is pure right-wing code speak. You have to go to the indoctrination meetings to learn how to speak that way." (post by 'Economides')

3 posted on 05/26/2009 2:40:57 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

I love how he contradicted himself. He commends Obama for his selection of a justice with a significant breadth and depth of background and experience, then follows by saying that he needs to learn more about her background, record and qualifications.

“I commend Obama because I’m a party-line Dem and that’s just what I do. Now, who exactly is Sonia Sotomayor??”


4 posted on 05/26/2009 2:47:31 PM PDT by RepublitarianRoger2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

I’m a Nebraska repub voter, so Ben could care less what I think. I’ve been calling his local and DC offices, on a regular basis, since the stimulus fiasco. The phone people have been courteous, but they’re a bunch of nervous nellies. If push comes to shove, he’ll tow the party line.


5 posted on 05/26/2009 2:48:49 PM PDT by peridot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Is it an election year? That’s the only way a Democrat won’t fall in lockstep with their Lord High Master in the White House and follow His orders.


6 posted on 05/26/2009 2:49:13 PM PDT by MuttTheHoople
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MuttTheHoople

Ben is not up for re-election until 2012.


7 posted on 05/26/2009 2:51:44 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat
It’s really not that difficult, Ben. Just read a couple of her quotes and you’ve got your answer . . . N O

This little puke will see where the votes are & when he sees that it is clear for him to vote no because she will be confirmed by the dumbocrats he'll do it. Then he can enter back to Huskerville. However, if it can down to only his vote I guarantee he would vote yes.

8 posted on 05/26/2009 2:51:51 PM PDT by Digger (If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

It’s going to be interesting on what all can be dug up about Sotomayor and if the GOP get all that information out to the public to cause a uproar. I think some senators like Nelson are going to be thinking about if they want a radical left winger like Sotomayor to be a issue in their next election.


9 posted on 05/26/2009 3:06:20 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedys float, Mary Jos don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Ben is not up for re-election until 2012.

I understand your reasoning here. People might just forget by 2012. But if she is as bad as it is looking he might vote no. Quite a few rats could vote no and she could still get in since they have such a good majority and we can't stop our RINO's from voting yes for her.

10 posted on 05/26/2009 3:10:50 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedys float, Mary Jos don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

11 posted on 05/26/2009 3:14:47 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Slightly more than half of voting Americans have forfeited their rights to citizenship. They are mere subjects now.

Come to think of it, if I were king I wouldn’t want most of them as subjects anyhow.

They’re that stupid...


12 posted on 05/26/2009 3:19:34 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson