These "Twin Studies" are always statistical in nature (as the article clearly suggests). I note no reference to the Margin of Error. I suspect it could be as high as 10%. Hence the <10% genetic correlation is probabaly itself just an anomaly that someone failed to correct for in the interest of reporting some level of gentic correlation.
posted on 05/27/2009 8:20:19 AM PDT
(Let Christ be true and every man a liar.)
That’s what the writer of the article concluded. Statistics is often misstated in support of homosexual activism. They can’t handle the truth.
posted on 05/27/2009 9:33:35 AM PDT
(Those that have nothing to hide welcome debate.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson