Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Chief: U.S. Can Fight North Korea If Necessary (What happened to the "stretched thin" debate?)
foxnews ^ | 5/28/2009 | ap

Posted on 05/28/2009 6:59:42 PM PDT by tobyhill

The United States could fight an old-fashioned war against North Korea if necessary, even while newer forms of conflict against terrorists and extremists continue, the Army's top officer said Thursday.

Asked whether the United States would be prepared to fight if war broke out between South Korea and North Korea, Gen. George Casey replied, "The short answer is yes," then added that "it would probably take us a little bit longer to shift gears" away from the type of counterinsurgency fighting that now occupies the Army.

Casey said his usual rubric for how long it would take the Army to gear up for a new "conventional" war is about 90 days. That doesn't mean it would take 90 days for the U.S. to effectively fight the North's million-man army, he said.

"We'd move forces as rapidly as we could get them prepared," Casey said during an appearance at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asia; bho44; bhoasia; bhodod; georgecasey; nknukes; northkorea; southkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

1 posted on 05/28/2009 6:59:42 PM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

He’s the Army Chief of Staff. What else do you expect him to say?


2 posted on 05/28/2009 7:00:40 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

90 days? Do you think we should be saying that in public?

Mr Kim has 90 days to take Seoul if he wants to keep it?

or that we will have to use nukes?


3 posted on 05/28/2009 7:01:19 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <----go there now, NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Uh, doesn’t the south have an army with guns and things? Just wondering.


4 posted on 05/28/2009 7:01:50 PM PDT by tired1 (When the Devil eats you there's only one way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

There’s a new set of rules on the playground. Obama’s in charge and he can do whatever he wants, say whatever he wants. Everything the Dems have said in the past four years is now null and void. bass turds


5 posted on 05/28/2009 7:01:57 PM PDT by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Hiroshima redux for Pyongyang?


6 posted on 05/28/2009 7:02:10 PM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
All I heard before was we couldn't handle another threat but now that the Zero is in charge it seems they all say we're safer with Obama or we can handle any threat.
7 posted on 05/28/2009 7:04:26 PM PDT by tobyhill (Obama's a has-been that never was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

So that music video U2 made of Katrina showing the army that would be available if only they were not in Iraq ...is BS. Troops are available. Enough to even fight Korea according to Obamas own general.

Interesting.

BTW-There are more combined troops in Iraq/Afghanistan now than under Bush.


8 posted on 05/28/2009 7:07:14 PM PDT by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired1

Yes, they do. However, a conventional war will be very bloody even if the South eventually prevails. And NK has nukes now. So that changes the equation some—actually a lot. We should have taken out their nuclear capability back in ‘94—would have been a lot cleaner then.


9 posted on 05/28/2009 7:07:58 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

We should have taken out their nuclear capability back in ‘94—would have been a lot cleaner then.


I should add—Clinton’s fault.


10 posted on 05/28/2009 7:09:22 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tired1

“Uh, doesn’t the south have an army with guns and things? Just wondering.”

Yes they do....and the ROKs, the ROK Marines in particular and not a group to be trifled with.


11 posted on 05/28/2009 7:11:13 PM PDT by Keith Brown (Among the other evils being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised Machiavelli.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

If North Korea attacked across the DMZ, South Korea would have to do most of the heavy lifting.

The General’s statement is posturing. We are stretched really, really thin.


12 posted on 05/28/2009 7:12:26 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

fight them for what?


13 posted on 05/28/2009 7:13:55 PM PDT by edcoil (IF CA rolls pollution standards back to 1990 levels, lets roll CA spending back as well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

First, read what he said. He didn’t say we wouldn’t do anything for 90 days. Second, do you think that the North Koreans think that we can move enough soldiers and more importantly, equipment, to Korea in a few weeks?


14 posted on 05/28/2009 7:14:38 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rbg81; tired1

> I should add—Clinton’s fault.

And don’t forget Jimmuh Carter going to NK while Bush was president, WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION.

They should have invalidated his passport and stranded him with his nuke-you-lah friends in NK.


15 posted on 05/28/2009 7:15:34 PM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

With all due respect, how do you know this? Do you have any data to support this, or is this just your own wild guess? Clearly soldiers have spent a lot of time fighting wars and war should be the last resort, but I still think you are wrong.


16 posted on 05/28/2009 7:16:27 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace

We could air-support SK real darn quick. We could kick NK’s skinny arse real darn quick. Only problem is having about a 10 million Chinese troops in there real darn quick, and them not buying our debt real darn quick.


17 posted on 05/28/2009 7:25:15 PM PDT by jdsteel (CONGRESS: Take it again in twenty ten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
And don’t forget Jimmuh Carter going to NK while Bush was president, WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION.

IIRC, Jimmeh pulled that stunt during the Clinton administration.

He went over without permission, negotiated a settlement without instructions or a portfolio...and presented President Clinton with a deal.

It gets worse; Clinton agreed to the fait accompli.

18 posted on 05/28/2009 7:26:36 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

This would be fought the way we’ve fought everything since Gulf I. Airforces pound artillery emplacements and completely destroy anything moving out in the open. Then, ground forces move in when overwhelming force is in place.

In this case, the main problem would be the collapse of what’s left of the NK government, and millions of starving refugees streaming over all the borders. This did not turn out to be a problem in Gulf I & II, but the Chi-Coms have everyone convinced that it would be here.

The O Administration will fall all over themselves allowing the Chi-Coms to broker a “deal” on this, that will put the rest of the planet at a major disadvantage.


19 posted on 05/28/2009 7:27:35 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Pusan comes to mind. We threw NG untrained troops into the perimeter there to be cut to shreds by the NK troops and they hung on by their fingernails. If the NK Army comes across the DMZ as they did 59 years ago it will be much a Deja Vu all over again. Equipment and expertise can only do so much against the numbers of men the NK Army will throw at ROK and US troops.
20 posted on 05/28/2009 7:29:30 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith Brown

>and not a group to be trifled with.

Perhaps They do have a large armed forces the size of which is maintained by ... conscription.

That makes it somewhat suspect, but the IDF uses universal conscription and it is pretty good.

It would be an interesting fight, to be sure.


21 posted on 05/28/2009 7:32:03 PM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel

Yep. There are no good or easy answers.


22 posted on 05/28/2009 7:33:49 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I would think the 30,000 troops in the Korean DMZ have been expecting and training for a conventional war along the border for 50 odd years.


23 posted on 05/28/2009 7:34:35 PM PDT by CaptRon (Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

No we aren’t.

We are fighting this war on a semi-peacetime footing. Most miltary personnel are actually in the US, not deployed, and the vast majority of the National Guard and Reserves are home as well. These are the people who could be mobilized and shipped to Korea in 90 days. Something like 80% of all combat units are in the US right now.

A new Korean war would require a mobilization on a real war footing, all available personnel and units called up for the duration, no rotations - well probably not that much would be required.

During much of the 1950’s Korean war there was only one US Division that was not either in Korea or Europe.


24 posted on 05/28/2009 7:35:24 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

If we really wanted to we could have the 82th and 101th on the way in a few days, plus the afloat equipment from Diego. Depending on airlift the striker brigade could go too. Everyone else would suck hind-tit for a long time. Say maybe 2 weeks for 3 light inventry divions, some Marines and 1 heavy brigade with cost being no object and Fedex, UPS and America airlines handling all they can. That would be a max effort lift with everything throw out the window.


25 posted on 05/28/2009 7:37:11 PM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace

I understand that because of pre-positioned equipment a fully equipped heavy Division could be assembled in Korea in less than a week, plus some light infantry.

More would require shipment of heavy equipment across the Pacific.


26 posted on 05/28/2009 7:37:33 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Hell yeah they are stretched thin. And fight North Korea? Yeah. But if the Chinese were to take North Korea’s side, that would be a challenge.


27 posted on 05/28/2009 7:41:23 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

How long did it take to gear up for OEF or OIF?


28 posted on 05/28/2009 7:50:10 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace

1991 ? about 4 months.

2003 it was about 2-3 months, but there was a lot of pre-positioned equipment in Kuwait.


29 posted on 05/28/2009 7:56:09 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

The units in the Pusan perimeter weren’t National Guard, they were regular Army (badly trained and ill equipped, true), mostly initially from the garrison in Japan.

The NK army is way obsolete (1950’s-1960’s vintage for the most part) and their heavy weapons haven’t gotten much in the way of spares from the Soviet stocks since 1990. Their tanks and artillery would be massacred by the South Koreans if they tried to attack.

SK forces aren’t the semi-policemen they were in 1950.


30 posted on 05/28/2009 8:01:35 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24; All

If North Korea attacked across the DMZ, South Korea would have to do most of the heavy lifting.

The General’s statement is posturing. We are stretched really, really thin.
~~~
IIRC NK can rain arty/rockets/etc. on the south for 3-4 days
(mite last a week)
of heavy fire,,,they/most are in tunnels north of the “Z”,,,
(that said)
I don’t think they can take the ROK Army,,,

Tear up Seoul ?,,,yes,,,

Will lil’kim try this ?,,,

If NK tries to cross the “Z” (2.5mi.) it’s BloodBathTime,,,

Same if we tried to go north,,,

How far will China let him go ?...:0/


31 posted on 05/28/2009 8:06:54 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

And let’s not forget the Japanese Self Defense Forces would certainly want a piece of Lil’ Kim. The JDSF didn’t even exist then. Right now they’re actually a very large and well equiped military on the world stage. Expect the Japs to take it to the Norks by air and sea, hard.

It won’t be June of 1950 all over again.


32 posted on 05/28/2009 8:11:57 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All

~~~Navy.mil~~~Today~~~

Ships and Submarines
Deployable Battle Force Ships: 283

Ships Underway (away from homeport): 134 ships (47 % of total)

On deployment: 115 ships (41 % of total)

Attack submarines underway (away from homeport): 32 submarines (59%)

On deployment: 22 submarines (40%)
Ships Underway

Carriers:
USS Nimitz (CVN 68) - Pacific Ocean
USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) - 5th Fleet
USS George Washington (CVN 73) - East China Sea
USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) - Pacific Ocean
USS George Bush (CVN 77) - Atlantic Ocean

Amphibious Warfare Ships:
USS Boxer (LHD 4) - 5th Fleet
USS Iwo Jima (LHD 7) - Atlantic Ocean
~~~
CVN 73 is now in range to smoke lil kim’s Fat Butt!...;0)


33 posted on 05/28/2009 8:19:29 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

But we don’t want Europe to hate us again do we??????


34 posted on 05/28/2009 8:23:18 PM PDT by Dallas59 ("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

So with a war on the Korean peninsula and Iran acting up..we end up with WWIII.


35 posted on 05/28/2009 8:31:08 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
The General’s statement is posturing. We are stretched really, really thin.

Please tell me you don'treally believe this? Every Army, AirForce, Marine, and Naval base is LOADED with troops! Stretched really, really thin? Not at all. I'm tryin really, really hard not to call you ignorant, but I think I just lost that battle.

36 posted on 05/28/2009 8:45:27 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel

Maybe the fed should order some new printing presses just in case.


37 posted on 05/28/2009 8:47:26 PM PDT by meatloaf (Obama, Obozo ... what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

USS George Washington CVN 73

38 posted on 05/28/2009 8:48:17 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

seems to me that one nuclear sub with 36 warheads could finish off North Korean in an hour...why waste American soldier’s lives against this totally corrupt regime and it’s crackpot leader...where’s Team America when you need ‘em.


39 posted on 05/28/2009 8:48:29 PM PDT by freedompursuit (Meet the new President of GM - Obama Camaro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

WWIII ?

Against who ?

These guys are pipsqeaks.

If the Chinese go insane and join in, then you will have a nasty regional war with nuclear risks, but thats still not WWIII.


40 posted on 05/28/2009 8:58:22 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace

probably, if we still have runways and air superiorty we can land planes full of troops, airliners if need be.


41 posted on 05/28/2009 9:03:48 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <----go there now, NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freedompursuit

There is a problem here -

North Korea is not just a nasty dictator and his friends, it is also @20 million mostly innocent people. Call it @ 500,000 genuine enemies and 21 million hostages (1 million being the South Koreans and Japanese the NK’s could realistically threaten to kill).

If it came to such a war, and there was no MAD-style nuclear risk a la the old Soviets, ALL means must be tried before nuclear attacks, even if it risks high casualties to US and South Korean forces.


42 posted on 05/28/2009 9:04:27 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

I certainly understand that - but the realization is the little whacko would not hesitate to turn Seoul into a Hiroshima - but hey, Obama will solve it all and diplomatically wipe him off the face of the earth...he’s all powerful you know - :)


43 posted on 05/28/2009 9:17:29 PM PDT by freedompursuit (Meet the new President of GM - Obama Camaro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
The Norks have the largest concentration of artillery tubes of any army in the world. They've built a maze of tunnels that emerge just inside othe DMZ. My uncle fought the NORKS in 51, he felt they were more dangerous man for man than the Chinese.

The ROK army is about 500-600 k and posssses modern though not state of the art weaponry. The US has 2ID in country and either a Marine div or brigade size force in Okinawa. If the norks come and don't use the nukes they will suffer enormous losses but they will take Seoul and inflict severe damage to our side, not to mention the losses to several millions of ROK civvies in and around the capital.

2nd infantry could lose more people in a week than we did in Iraq in 5 years. I don't think America is ready for that kind of carnage and I KNOW Obama and his minions aren't.

44 posted on 05/28/2009 9:22:31 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel

Not only would we have Chinese troops in there, we would also have Russian troops and support forces. Both of them have anti-Stealth technology and Russia may already have 5th generation fighter aircraft.


45 posted on 05/28/2009 9:57:35 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

The North Koreans have plenty of artillery tubes, true, to be shot from fixed positions without observation. They can’t be moved without being destroyed en masse by allied artillery and aircraft. These would (or could, I think the condition of this stuff at this point is questionable) create a terrific unaimed bombardment along the DMZ which allied units, being mobile, can avoid.

How could the Norks reach Seoul ? They can’t come out of their holes without getting massacred. The South Koreans possess plenty of armor far superior to what the Norks have, and plenty of artillery that is mobile, has excellent observation and targeting, and can be used effectively to destroy any unit in motion. And then there is US and Korean airpower. And these can also be used with precision in the dark and bad weather. Its not 1950 anymore. Any North Korean attack would be exterminated before it begins.

The ROK army is several million strong when mobilized, 500-600K is just the peacetime figure, mostly the regular cadre plus those doing their military service. That is plenty to hold a impenetrable line across the penninsula given absolute air supremacy and modern technology.

2ID is now based in the US. There is I think still a brigade on 2ID in Korea plus service units, and pre-positioned equipment for the whole division and maybe one other, I don’t recall.


46 posted on 05/28/2009 10:02:14 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Er, there are no Russian troops coming. What for ?

And they don’t really have anything they didn’t have in 1991. All hat, no cattle that bunch.

And I doubt any Chinese either, unless they go mad.


47 posted on 05/28/2009 10:04:44 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

“It would be an interesting fight, to be sure.”

Yeah

I work with some retired Army folks who lived many years in Korea.

They said that of NK was going to invade SK that they’d have to do it in Winter before the rivers and paddys thaw...

Otherwise they’d never get thru the back ups on the roads around Seoul let alone out fight the kimchis.

Interesting point.


48 posted on 05/28/2009 10:20:09 PM PDT by Keith Brown (Among the other evils being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised Machiavelli.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Of course we can. We have 300 million people and the largest economy (and manufacturing base) in the world. All that would be required is diverting the $11 trillion to defense instead of pork projects. H3!!, for $11 trillion, we should be able to pretty much do as we please.


49 posted on 05/28/2009 10:49:00 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("Do you call it 'unsound method'?" "No method at all," I murmured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tired1

You don’t realize how bloody a shooting war could be in Korea.....thousands dead. North Korea would throw everything at us including nukes. Kim and his generals know once shooting starts its the regimes death sentence.


50 posted on 05/29/2009 1:39:20 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson