Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CHATTAB
The only time I would allow abortions would be those cases involving incest and/or rape.

So you would allow for the murder of innocent human beings under those circumstances?

428 posted on 05/31/2009 10:54:24 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper ([Advocate for] Mitt Romney[?], God help you, but you're on the wrong website ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]


To: big'ol_freeper

...and you would not protect innocent human beings from being murdered...by stopping the person about to perform the murder?
You equate the lives of unborn children as the same as children (okay, anyone that has been born) playing in a playground?
If that’s the case, why aren’t you out physically stopping people who perform abortions?
From your perspective, shouldn’t you do everything in your power to stop an abortionist as you would a madman killing children on a playground? What is stoppping you? The law is stopping you? From protecting innocent children?


477 posted on 05/31/2009 11:05:23 AM PDT by CHATTAB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]

To: big'ol_freeper
PLEASE!
It is morally acceptable for the law to recognize that the public must support and respect the law.

Exceptions are morally acceptable, if necessary to restrict, regulate, and reduce abortions.

“no exceptions, no compromise” gets us “no progress!!”

820 posted on 05/31/2009 12:39:23 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson