Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58

Wrong. They would never pass that law without the “health of the mother” provision and that is a no go. Would not reduce abortions. Think with your soul not your political expediency.

899 posted on 05/31/2009 1:20:04 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper ([Advocate for] Mitt Romney[?], God help you, but you're on the wrong website ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 890 | View Replies ]

To: big'ol_freeper
Sorry friend, but on this one, you simply do not know what you are talking about.

There simply are not ENOUGH late term abortions of KANSAS citizens to keep Tiller in business.

Tiller benefited because OUR LAWS, in Kansas, are the MOST LIBERAL in the entire United States!

This is true because prolife “purists” fight every attempt to pass laws as strict as those in New York or Massachusetts!

Tiller was made possible, and RICH, due to prolifers fighting prolifers!

Part of what you say is correct, outright prohibitions would be struck down by the courts -—

But this is NO excuse for fighting every restriction on abortion that we tried to do!

I support the National Right to Life Committee.

ALL and Operation Rescue, despite their good intentions, have often fought the NRLC and brought our legislative initiatives to a stand still!

Want proof?

Tiller was recently PROSECUTED for violating Kansas abortion law.

When prolife Democrat Gov. Finney signed that bill into law, Operation Rescue, and ALL, called Finney a “traitor” -—

Sorry, but NRLC is FAR more competent on the legislative front.

I listen to OR when it comes to street protest, I listen to NRLC when it comes to legislation!~

1,040 posted on 05/31/2009 2:46:27 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson