Posted on 05/31/2009 12:15:41 PM PDT by Crazieman
No article link, just headline
I know if I were on the jury I would have a real hard time convicting this guy.
I don't want to cross that line of taking the law into my own hands, but that line only exists when there is a real effort by the judiciary to be just. In Dred Scott the judiciary was not just and because the injustice continued we ended up in a civil war.
100 percent BS.
Thank you.
The whole system stinks right now. Everything seems to be based on emotion. If we really want justice for all we want judges to rule on the law not on how they feel.
The courts loathe "jury nullification" - but overly zealous prosecutors provoke it.
Thank you for sharing your views, dear brother in Christ!
D: 100 percent BS.
Do the math.
If you total the number of aborted babies that would be at least 18 yr old now you come up with aprox. 16 million. I'm calculating from 1975 to 1991 at 1 million a year.
Now ask why are there 16-20 million illegal aliens in this country.
The answer is there was a magnet drawing them. The magnet was money for work. Now ask why didn't we have the labor supply in this country to handle those jobs and look at the number of missing people due to abortion.
We are already being punished for allowing abortion in this country. Our country is disappearing right in front of us.
You seem lost. I know why, and it has zip to do with abortions. Nice try.
It's all about cheap, low wage labor. Nothing else, zip nada.
Profits regardless of consequences.
You think thousands of corporations and businesses went to Red China, and Mexico, and other low wage countries because of abortions?
Get real.
The point is that he is a vigilante, pure and simple...it makes no difference that he murdered a serial baby killer. He had no right to take the law into his own hands and the punishment for him should be the same as it would be for other murderers under Kansas law (which I believe is still capital punishment and used to be by hanging)
Murder is murder. This vigilante stained his hands and he is now as accountable before God as the doctor is.
These kinds of incidents hurt the pro-life movement. It paints us as crackpots and hyprocrites willing to sell our souls for a very short term illusinary gain.
Brilliant argument - you’ve said nothing. Do you also stand for nothing? Can you inform us *what* you stand for?
Since this is the product of your own thinking, please explain how you plan to start *your* society? Just askin’...
++++++++++++++++
Are you a parrot? lol...still waiting to see if you want to actually say anything for yourself about this topic.
Also unconfirmed, note absence of link.
And we adults tend to capitalize where appropriate.
Brilliant response - you’ve said nothing.
Do you also stand for nothing but projecting your own insane thought processes onto others.
Do you support projecting insanity onto others?
Are you as nutty as your posts? lol...still waiting to see if you can match the insanity that you project onto others.
“Do you believe that late term abortions are “Murder”?”
++++++++++++++++
Yes. Don’t stop there - what about 2nd and 1st trimetsers - where most of the killing is going on. Although 3rd trimester abortions are particularly heinous because most of those children can live outside the womb. We have institutionalized the murder of human beings for the god of convenience. The answer to this issue is not to murder murderers in the name of Life. The answer is to quash the demand for abortions/murders. The abortionists will disappear.
That’s like saying you have no moral responsibility to take action if you know the man next door is chopping up his family with an axe.
Then tell me, if by some act of Divine intervention or by sheer dumb luck you found yourself sitting on the jury for the Murder of George Tiller and
1) the defendant took the stand and confessed to the killing and
2) pleaded not guilty by reason of the doctrine of "defense of others" (i.e., he knew that Tiller was going to perform another late term abortion the next day and the cops were not going to stop him [even though Kansas law prohibits all late term abortions except in cases of "catastrophic threat to the health of the mother"]), and
3) it all came down to your vote;
would you find the defendant guilty or not guilty.
I’ve already said I think he should have been sentenced to the electric chair (or something similar), rather than killed by a vigilante’s bullet. The point is to make society accountable. To do otherwise, will not stop abortions.
Bruce: “Are you a parrot? lol...still waiting to see if you want to actually say anything for yourself about this topic.”
Dan: Are you as nutty as your posts? lol...still waiting to see if you can match the insanity that you project onto others.
++++++++++++
You’re like a child that starts to mimic another, and then just doesn’t stop...wow...I have noticed from your other comments (mind you I had to do some digging), that you *can* actually speak for yourself...lol...we’ll just have to wait and see if you’ve anything to say about the actual topic here. And you’re calling me nutty? Rich...
Would you vote to acquit or convict?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.