Skip to comments.Climate of Hate, World of Double Standards
Posted on 06/02/2009 10:45:33 PM PDT by pissant
When a right-wing Christian vigilante kills, millions of fingers pull the trigger. When a left-wing Muslim vigilante kills, he kills alone. These are the instantly ossifying narratives in the Sunday shooting death of late-term abortion provider George Tiller of Kansas versus the Monday shootings of two Arkansas military recruiters.
Tiller's suspected murderer, Scott Roeder, is white, Christian, anti-government and anti-abortion. The gunman in the military recruitment center attack, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, is black, a Muslim convert, anti-military and anti-American.
Both crimes are despicable, cowardly acts of domestic terrorism. But the disparate treatment of the two brutal cases by both the White House and the media is striking.
President Obama issued a statement condemning "heinous acts of violence" within hours of Tiller's death. The Justice Department issued its own statement and sent federal marshals to protect abortion clinics. News anchors and headline writers abandoned all qualms about labeling the gunman a terrorist. An almost gleeful excess of mainstream commentary poured forth on the climate of hate and fear created by conservative talk radio, blogs and Fox News in reporting Tiller's activities.
By contrast, Obama was silent about the military recruiter attacks that left 24-year-old Pvt. William Long dead and 18-year-old Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula gravely wounded. On Tuesday afternoon -- more than 24 hours after the attack on the military recruitment center in Little Rock, Ark. -- Obama held a press conference to announce his pick for Army secretary. It would have been exactly the right moment to express condolences for the families of the targeted Army recruiters and to condemn heinous acts of violence against our troops.
But Obama said nothing. The Justice Department was mum. And so were the legions of finger-pointing pundits happily convicting the pro-life movement and every right-leaning writer on the planet of contributing to the murder of Tiller. Obama's omission, it should be noted, comes just a few weeks after he failed to mention the Bronx jihadi plot to bomb synagogues and a National Guard airbase during his speech on homeland security.
Why the silence? Politically and religiously motivated violence, it seems, is only worth lamenting when it demonizes opponents. Which also helps explain why the phrase "lone shooter" is ubiquitous in media coverage of jihadi shooters gone wild -- think convicted "Jeep Jihadist" Mohammed Taheri-Azar at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill or Israel-bashing gunman Naveed Haq, who targeted a Seattle Jewish charity or Los Angeles International Airport shooter Hesham Hedayet, who opened fire at the El Al Israeli airline ticket counter -- but not in cases involving rare acts of anti-abortion violence.
Even Jeffrey Goldberg of the left-leaning Atlantic magazine noticed the double standards. He called attention to a National Public Radio report on the military recruiter attack that failed to mention the religion and anti-military animus of the suspect. Wrote Goldberg: "Why not tell people what is actually happening in the world? We saw this a couple of weeks ago, when the press only gingerly acknowledged that the malevolent though incompetent suspects in the synagogue bombing-conspiracy case in New York were converts to Islam. How is the public served by this kind of silence? The extremist Christian beliefs of George Tiller's alleged murderer are certainly relevant to that case, and no one in my profession is hesitant to discuss them. Why the hesitancy to talk about the motivations of the man who allegedly killed Pvt. William Long?"
The truth is that the "climate of hate" doesn't have just one hemisphere. But you won't hear the Council on American-Islamic Relations acknowledging the national security risks of jihadi infiltrators who despise our military and have plotted against our troops from within the ranks -- including convicted fragging killer Hasan Akbar and terror plotters Ali Mohamed, Jeffrey Battle and Semi Osman.
You won't hear about the escalating war on military recruitment centers on the op-ed pages of The New York Times -- from vandalism to obstruction to Molotov cocktail attacks on campus stations across the country; to the shutdown of a Pittsburgh military recruitment office by zealots holding signs that read "Recruiters are Child Predators"; to the prolonged harassment campaign against the Marine recruiting center in Berkeley, where Code Pink protesters called America soldiers assassins; to the bomb blast at the Times Square recruiting center last March.
And you'll certainly hear little about the most recent left-wing calls to violence by a Playboy magazine writer who published a vulgar list of conservative female writers and commentators he said he'd like to rape (the obscene slang word he used is not printable). The list was hyped by the magazine's publicity team and light-heartedly promoted by mainstream publications such as Politico.com (founded by Washington Post reporters).
Is it too much to ask the media cartographers in charge of mapping the "climate of hate" to do their jobs with both eyes open?
If the Republicans had a brain among them, they would jump on this double standard and tie it to the Democrats.
Obama is about to give an I-love-muslims speech in Egypt. Maybe he figures that the timing is bad for saying anything about a muslim murdering an American soldier in uniform in the United States. 0 has his priorities. /s
There is a difference in these two crimes, though. One crime was committed by a jihadist against Americans, and the soldiers symbolized what the Muslim terrorists hate most about America freedom, and those who fight for it. The other is a crime committed against a mass murderer, and although it is "legal" murder, it doesn't mean Tiller was right. It was legal for the Nazis to kill Jews as well. Mao Tse-Tung , Pol Pot, Mussolini, Franco, and all your assorted communists and fascists killed people legally. Legal doesn't always mean moral or right. What is legal is product of politicians passing laws, or imposing laws, and communists, marxists, and democrats can pass as many laws as they want now that they have the WH, House, and Senate.
PS: Anyone who becomes a Muslim terrorist and harbors the intention of killing Americas due to their professed hatred against America and our American way of life, to me isn't a real American, even if he or she was born in the USA.
The religious right, to include the anti-abortion movement, spent many years and very, very much money taking over the the republican party, only to watch as the republican party went down in a big ball of flames.
Kinda funny too. The GOP picked one of the least desirable hacks it could have in Juan McCain as a jab in the eye to religious conservatives. That worked out swell.
Maybe they should have nominated James Dobson.
James Dobson is a preacher.
They should have nominated Duncan Hunter. The constitutional, small gov’t, tax cutters would have been happy. The Defense hawks would have been ecstatic. The religious conservatives would have had a non-bending ally. And the champions of US sovereignty would have had the most pro-American sovereignty prez in the last 100 years.
Bump for later reading.
“The religious right, to include the anti-abortion movement, spent many years and very, very much money taking over the the republican party, only to watch as the republican party went down in a big ball of flames.”
Yech, you sound like a libtard.
What the forces of evil now call “the religious right” was the mainstream, centrist, position of the overwhelming majority of both Republicans and Democrats within my lifetime.
There is no religious right. There is the common-sense, traditional American volksgeist, and then there is leftism.
This POS travelled to Yemen and possibly Somalia, possibly under a false passport. I doubt that was a vacation as these are two major hotspots of fundamentalism and jihad. He was under investigation by the FBI. So eight years after 9/11 the FBI let this maniac walk around, and even murder a U.S. soldier on U.S. soil. What the hell are the Feebs thinking?????
“When a right-wing Christian vigilante kills”
That statement is too flawed to stand.
Christians don’t kill. Our weapons are not carnal (physical) but mighty through God to the pulling down of strongholds.
>PS: Anyone who becomes a Muslim terrorist and harbors the intention of killing Americas due to their professed hatred against America and our American way of life, to me isn’t a real American, even if he or she was born in the USA.
I believe that is defined as TREASON by our Constitution.
Had he become a contender, a group of true conservatives would have found something they didn't like about him and tried to destroy him.
Remember, one "aw shit" counters 10 "attaboys"
Fred Thompson would have been a better choice. He waited to late to get in the race and then ran a lackluster campaign.
Fred had contractual obligations to NBC arising from reruns of Law and Order extending through last August, that he decided precluded his announcing. Apparently he had legal advice, that announcing a campaign would require NBC to pull their remaining episodes and expose Fred to liability.
Once he was in, he starved for oxygen and never got going. He got the minor-candidate treatment while the media fawned over their preferred
You know all about "true conservatives" -- you keep talking about them. So prove it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.