Skip to comments.
Single women gaze longer
Springer Science + Business Media ^
| 3 June 2009
| Renate Bayaz
Posted on 06/03/2009 12:58:58 PM PDT by Pharmboy
Neuroscientists found woman's partner status relevant for her interest in the opposite sex
A study by neuroscientist Heather Rupp and her team found that a woman's partner status influenced her interest in the opposite sex. In the study¹, published in the March issue of Human Nature, women both with and without sexual partners showed little difference in their subjective ratings of photos of men when considering such measures as masculinity and attractiveness. However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not.
"These findings may reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies that may act early in the cognitive processing of potential partners and contribute to sex differences in sexual attraction and behavior," said Rupp, assistant scientist at The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction at Indiana University in the US.
For the study, 59 men and 56 women rated 510 photos of opposite-sex faces for realism, masculinity/femininity, attractiveness, or affect. Participants were instructed to give their "gut" reaction and to rate the pictures as quickly as possible. The men and women ranged in age from 17 to 26, were heterosexual, from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and were not using hormonal contraception. Of the women, 21 reported they had a current sexual partner; 25 of the men reported having a sexual partner. This is the first study to report whether having a current sexual partner influences interest in the opposite sex. Other studies have demonstrated that hormones, relationship goals and social context influence such interest.
"That there were no detectable effects of sexual partner status on women's subjective ratings of male faces, but there were on response times, which emphasizes the subtlety of this effect and introduces the possibility that sexual partner status impacts women's cognitive processing of novel male faces but not necessarily their conscious subjective appraisal," the authors wrote in the journal article. The researchers also note that influence of partner status in women could reflect that women, on average, are relatively committed in their romantic relationships, "which possibly suppresses their attention to and appraisal of alternative partners."
Reference ¹Rupp H et al. 2009. Partner Status Influences Womens Interest in the Opposite Sex. Human Nature DOI 10.1007/s12110-009-9056-6
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: courtship; dating; freepun; humor; indianauniversity; kinsey; kinseyinstitute; partners; psychology; sexdifferences; singles; taxdollarsatwork; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-136 next last
OK...who's going to be the first to post the Captain Obvious pic?
1
posted on
06/03/2009 12:58:59 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
To: Pharmboy
I wanna know how much money they spent on this ‘research’.
2
posted on
06/03/2009 1:00:12 PM PDT
by
farlander
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: Pharmboy
I always look down on women who cheat more than men. For example, Vitter is a sleazeball. But a woman cheating is so much worse.
3
posted on
06/03/2009 1:01:26 PM PDT
by
exist
To: blam; thefactor; SunkenCiv; aculeus; pissant; Lazamataz; martin_fierro; Tijeras_Slim
Ping for vive le difference...and Happy Birthday to thefactor!!
4
posted on
06/03/2009 1:01:45 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
To: Pharmboy
GAZING WOMAN by Penelope Jencks.....
5
posted on
06/03/2009 1:02:13 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: Pharmboy
To: Pharmboy
7
posted on
06/03/2009 1:02:53 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: farlander
Hey...it’s the Kinsey folks. That’s what their $$ is for, doncha know.
8
posted on
06/03/2009 1:03:02 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
To: jessduntno
9
posted on
06/03/2009 1:03:36 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
To: jessduntno
GRAZING WOMAN......................
10
posted on
06/03/2009 1:04:46 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: jessduntno
Colin Self
Gazing Woman
To: Revolting cat!
The men and women ranged in age from 17 to 26, were heterosexual, But the headline says...
12
posted on
06/03/2009 1:06:25 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Justice is blind. Sonia Sotomayor is not even qualified to sit on an IMPARTIAL jury.)
To: jessduntno
GLAZING WOMAN.................
13
posted on
06/03/2009 1:06:53 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: Pharmboy
However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not. The men were evaluating photos of women, I assume. ; )
To: jessduntno
She looks like she has bowel cramps.
To: Pharmboy
To: Pharmboy
Well, DUH.
Where can I get funded for inane “research”?
To: jessduntno
LAZING WOMEN............
18
posted on
06/03/2009 1:09:11 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: humblegunner
Last time I saw an expression like that it was on a hound passing peach pits.
To: Pharmboy
And I can show you how to hump without making love
The way you look at me, I can tell that you're a freak
And I'll be laying in the sun, bottle and a gun
The way you look at me, I can tell that you're a freak
20
posted on
06/03/2009 1:09:33 PM PDT
by
ßuddaßudd
(7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona....)
To: Pharmboy
I thought it was Ohio cheerleaders who had to be kept from grazing. Oh, wait, you said gazing.
To: jessduntno
AMAZING WOMAN..........................
22
posted on
06/03/2009 1:09:51 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: Pharmboy
How many of them bit their lower lip while gazing at the photos? That’s the real indicator.
To: Pharmboy
"which possibly suppresses their attention to and appraisal of alternative partners." So what about that old chestnut? ...then eating 'wedding cake' suppresses women's attention to and appraisal to all partners.
To: Revolting cat!
Someone should post the pix of angry Michelle Obowma with the caption ‘Crazing Woman’ ...
25
posted on
06/03/2009 1:10:47 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: Pharmboy
And in today’s other breaking stories, sun rises in east, and water freezes when it gets cold...film at ll!
26
posted on
06/03/2009 1:11:27 PM PDT
by
Clioman
To: Pharmboy
However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos.
Amazing!
and how much did this study cost taxpayers?
27
posted on
06/03/2009 1:12:43 PM PDT
by
Minutemen
("It's a Religion of Peace")
To: MHGinTN
CRAZING WOMAN
28
posted on
06/03/2009 1:13:17 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: MHGinTN
Crazing Woman!
To: Tijeras_Slim
30
posted on
06/03/2009 1:14:44 PM PDT
by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: Revolting cat!
31
posted on
06/03/2009 1:14:45 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
("Way past time for new commodities regulation")
To: HoosierHawk
Nice pick-up...we need Captain Unambiguous to edit this release.
32
posted on
06/03/2009 1:16:21 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
To: jessduntno
PHASING WOMAN
33
posted on
06/03/2009 1:18:36 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: jessduntno
Good ones...since you’re on fire, how about Blazing Woman?
34
posted on
06/03/2009 1:19:27 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
To: Pharmboy
Single women graze longer?
35
posted on
06/03/2009 1:20:49 PM PDT
by
DocH
(Official Right-Wing Extremist Veteran Seal Of Approval)
To: jessduntno
HAZING WOMEN
36
posted on
06/03/2009 1:20:53 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Pharmboy
A study by neuroscientist Heather Rupp and her team found that a woman's partner status influenced her interest in the opposite sex. In the study¹, published in the March issue of Human Nature, women both with and without sexual partners showed little difference in their subjective ratings of photos of men when considering such measures as masculinity and attractiveness. However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not. Federal funding for validation of common sense is not demonstrative of smart thinking.
37
posted on
06/03/2009 1:23:09 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Out of gas become a pill box, Out of ammo become a bunker, Out of hope become a hero.)
To: r9etb
Blazing woman...
38
posted on
06/03/2009 1:23:42 PM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 135 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: r9etb
TASING WOMAN:
39
posted on
06/03/2009 1:25:26 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
To: Pharmboy
40
posted on
06/03/2009 1:25:30 PM PDT
by
bdeaner
(The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
To: jessduntno
Lasing woman ...
41
posted on
06/03/2009 1:25:34 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Out of gas become a pill box, Out of ammo become a bunker, Out of hope become a hero.)
To: r9etb
GRAZING WOMEN!
42
posted on
06/03/2009 1:26:52 PM PDT
by
petercooper
(1/20/13 - Change I can believe in.)
To: null and void
Tasing woman
43
posted on
06/03/2009 1:27:38 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
To: Petronski
Sheesh...you beat me by 2 minutes.
44
posted on
06/03/2009 1:28:43 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
To: Petronski
LA RAZING WOMAN
45
posted on
06/03/2009 1:29:27 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Pharmboy
They looked at opposite sex faces? How about looking at the whole body? What a bogus study.
To: Pharmboy
BLAZING WOMAN (Miss Stein)..........
47
posted on
06/03/2009 1:29:42 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: r9etb
48
posted on
06/03/2009 1:30:09 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: Pharmboy
Raising Woman
To: Pharmboy
Amazing Woman...
50
posted on
06/03/2009 1:31:17 PM PDT
by
Jeff Gordon
(I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-136 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson