So, are you saying they’re incompatible,
in contrast to the person you replied to that stated they were incompatible?
Islam is a totalitarian system of governance, religion, and justice all rolled into one. But it is more than that; it is a war manual, a system designed to conquer the entire world. Islam needs to be in a perpetual state of war to function it's best.
Islam can not exist for very long without a war to fight. When Islam appears to be dead, it is only sleeping until it regains enough strength in numbers to fight on.
It is not a system for a non-waring society to build on, it needs to feed off the spoils of war to increase the wealth of it's "umma" Muslim society. It also needs a non-muslim class (captors) to extract a Jizya tax on. Over time, the conquered people die off, slip away, or convert to Islam to avoid this heavy tax, and Islam must move on to conquer another nation to feed off of again.
Islamic society does not allow for much profit taking, so the western banking system cannot function according to Sharia laws. It's traditional roots are bartering, trading something for something of equal value. Profiting excessively is actually punishable under sharia laws.
This is why Islamic societies always seems to stagnate and go nowhere. The exception is oil rich Islamic states where they have a constant influx of western money, which replaces the Jizya tax they would otherwise need to build such extravagance like they do in places like the United Emmerates.