Skip to comments.
SHOCK AT THE PUMP-proposal essentially would limit how much gasoline, fossil fuels Americans can use
ncpa.org ^
| 6.4.9
Posted on 06/04/2009 1:32:16 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: InvisibleChurch
$118 a year is nothing compared to Cap N Trade
2
posted on
06/04/2009 1:34:23 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <----go there now,----> tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
To: InvisibleChurch
Prices for gas and electricity are going to be much higher than this article would lead you to believe. Or maybe not, as with the absence of any productive economic activity, there won’t be much demand.
3
posted on
06/04/2009 1:37:10 PM PDT
by
henkster
(The GOP is housebroken window-dressing displayed to portray the fiction of a Republic.)
To: InvisibleChurch
4
posted on
06/04/2009 1:37:20 PM PDT
by
avacado
To: avacado
The teleprompter rear view mirrors are a nice touch...
5
posted on
06/04/2009 1:41:35 PM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 136 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: avacado
6
posted on
06/04/2009 1:42:54 PM PDT
by
gibsosa
To: InvisibleChurch
Those idiots in Congress and the idiots in the oil industry are out to destroy western civilization.
7
posted on
06/04/2009 1:44:17 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
To: avacado
The OBamaMobile
8
posted on
06/04/2009 1:44:17 PM PDT
by
Tarheel
(From the Old North State)
To: ZULU
They keep this up... Someone’s gonna get hurt.
To: ZULU
“...destroy western civilization.”
Yes, and they also want to control our freedom to travel.
To: InvisibleChurch
"The aim is to cut emissions of carbon dioxide from energy use; yet, prices would have to rise high enough so the public would be forced to drive less and meet the ever-tightening energy rationing targets."....
LOL!...come 2012 Obuma won't have a chance at re-election.
11
posted on
06/04/2009 1:47:57 PM PDT
by
Dallas59
("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
To: InvisibleChurch
That's it. I'm going to go buy this on Saturday:
12
posted on
06/04/2009 1:48:07 PM PDT
by
Little Pig
(Is it time for "Cowboys and Islamofanatics" yet?)
To: InvisibleChurch
Most Americans will blame Bush, Cheney, Halliburton, etc.
13
posted on
06/04/2009 1:49:11 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(The University of Notre Dame's motto: "Kill our unborn children? YES WE CAN!")
To: InvisibleChurch
Kiss the tourist and boating industry goodbye.... and much, much more.
14
posted on
06/04/2009 1:50:08 PM PDT
by
Gator113
(Weak-coward-racist-white hating-lying-traitor= Surrender Monkey in Chief-B. Hussein Obama...)
To: avacado
That is NOT funny. TOTUS could ride in one. No one else could.
A cross-country trip in one of those would be killer.
15
posted on
06/04/2009 1:51:18 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The 5 Stages of Collapse: http://www.energybulletin.net/node/47157)
To: InvisibleChurch
16
posted on
06/04/2009 1:56:54 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: This Just In
Yes, and they also want to control our freedom to travel.
Just like Obamacare - the Dems want total control of our lives. Cap n trade and Obamacare will just about do it - what you eat, what exercise you do or don't do, what sports you play, how you travel, what lights you use, where your temp is set, TOTAL control of everything.
17
posted on
06/04/2009 1:57:53 PM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: InvisibleChurch
The article mentions $2.35 gas a week ago. It’s now $2.75 here (in Ohio). I noticed the 40-cent-per-gallon jump happened almost immediately after Obama said Iran has the right to nuclear power, i.e., weapons. Might have been Monday, can’t remember.
To: Little Pig
Then you could change to, *Big Pig*. I like it!
19
posted on
06/04/2009 2:14:25 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(KMTA!)
To: InvisibleChurch
An energy policy that is based on limiting the amount of energy each is allowed is as bankrupt as this administration. Our energy policy should be the opposite. Do what is necessary to insure cheap, plentiful energy. Unfortunately, that would allow citizen too much freedom and our government can’t tolerate that.
20
posted on
06/04/2009 2:15:35 PM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
