Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Korea moves to heightened alert level (map of global security alerts)
Jane's Intelligence Weekly ^ | June 3, 2009

Posted on 06/05/2009 1:42:08 PM PDT by STARWISE

South Korea moves to heightened alert level EVENT

South Korea raised its five-level Watch Condition (Watchcon) to level two on 28 May, for the fifth time since the Korean War ended in 1953.

The move comes after North Korea’s 25 May nuclear test.

The increase in Watchcon from level three means that the South Korea-US Combined Forces Command (CFC) will deploy additional intelligence-collecting assets and increase reconnaissance missions.

The heightened alert status of the CFC came after North Korea’s bellicose reaction to South Korea joining the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) on 26 May. Pyongyang subsequently stated through its state-run news agency: “The Korean War armistice has lost its binding power, so the Korean peninsula is at war.”

The 27 July 1953 armistice has acted as a ceasefire since the end of the Korean War, although no formal peace agreement has been signed.

South Korea joined the PSI after North Korea’s second nuclear test on 25 May. The test, which achieved an estimated yield between 1.5 and 4 kilotonnes, followed the 5 April launch of the Unha 2 space-launch vehicle and North Korea’s 14 April withdrawal from the six-party negotiations to denuclearise the Korean peninsula.

This series of proliferation-related events prompted South Korea to announce its accession to the PSI, an informal grouping of states created in 2003 to interdict shipments of goods that could be used in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and delivery systems. Given North Korea’s sale of missile-related products over the past two decades to countries such as Pakistan and Iran, any curtailment of this trade could reduce a useful source of hard currency for the otherwise impoverished country.

North Korea reacted belligerently to South Korea joining the PSI. Pyongyang stated on 27 May: “Any hostile act by South Korea, including a crackdown on and search of our vessels, will be met with strong military attacks.” The same statement warned that North Korea “cannot guarantee the legal status of South Korea’s five islands in waters near our maritime borders and the safety of US or South Korean naval and commercial vessels operating in neighbouring waters.”

This has raised concern internationally and in South Korea that a clash might be forthcoming, similar to the June 2002 skirmish near the disputed Northern Limit Line that killed five South Korean sailors and an estimated 30 North Korean personnel. Alternatively, North Korea could attempt a bolder strategy of engaging US forces, perhaps in an operation similar to the 1968 capture of the surveillance ship USS Pueblo.


Large-scale conflict on the Korean peninsula is improbable. The vast technological superiority of South Korean security forces and the presence of 28,500 US troops in the country serve as an effective military deterrent. Reflecting this, while Watchcon was raised to level two, the Defence Readiness Condition (Defcon) remains at level four. Nonetheless, should South Korea engage in PSI-related interdictions of North Korean vessels, a naval clash near the disputed maritime border in the Yellow Sea (West Sea) is possible.

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: janes; missile; northkorea; southkorea
Map showing locations of North Korean nuclear tests, as estimated by the Korean Meteorological Association (KMA) and United States Geological Survey (USGS). Insets were acquired on 14 May 2009 by DigitalGlobe’s QuickBird satellite. Top right: significant excavation indicates recent tunnelling at this underground facility. Top left: personnel and vehicles were observed at these barracks and maintenance bays. Bottom: heavily secured compound adjacent to the region’s only road access point also shows evidence of underground activity. J Bermudez-DigitalGlobe/1348016


Global Security Alert by Country (scroll down left to "Security Alert"

Surprised to see Guatemala at "significant" risk.

1 posted on 06/05/2009 1:42:08 PM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster


2 posted on 06/05/2009 1:45:40 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]



3 posted on 06/05/2009 1:51:42 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

May God help us because Hussein 0bama has said that Iran has a “right” to nuclear energy, (why not N. Korea, poor nation, let them have their nukes for energy) despite the fact they sit upon oil reserves that can keep them going for decades. Nuclear energy is Okay for Iran despite the fact of their endless oil reserves - but not America - we can't even drill for our own oil reserves - we can't build new nuclear power plants. We can't even burn coal which we have abundantly. Hussein has one standard for Iran and another for us. What if Indiana decided we want a nuclear plant for energy or a coal burning plant? The Hussein cult would condemn us and put us on the DHS radical list. North Korea is full steam ahead on a nuke program and the cult believes a strongly worded response will deter them. Maybe they are just testing their nukes for peaceful purposes. That will be the next thing out of Hussein's play book - they are a poor nation, they have a right to nuclear energy.

Why is it Okay for 2 members of the axis of evil to have nukes - Iran and N. Korea, But folks here in the US are increasingly being told that we need to rely on windmills and the sun to provide our energy? At what point does the American public stand up and say we have had enough?

We now have 16 government czars controlling almost every aspect of our life. Government owns auto, insurance and banking industries and wants to run hellth care. At what point do we make a stand? Why is it Okay for Iran to have nuclear energy and N. Korea to explode nukes but we have to disarm and look forward to the wind and sun for energy? I never thought I would see anything like this. It gets worse every freakin day.

4 posted on 06/05/2009 2:25:52 PM PDT by appleseed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


“Large-scale conflict on the Korean peninsula is improbable. The vast technological superiority of South Korean security forces and the presence of 28,500 US troops in the country serve as an effective military deterrent.”

This assumes a rationale actor on the NK side of things . . .

5 posted on 06/05/2009 5:44:44 PM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson