Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stay Issued in Chrysler Sale; High Court to Hear Case
Fox News ^ | June8, 2009 | Kathryn Glass

Posted on 06/08/2009 1:07:23 PM PDT by libstripper

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued a stay in the Chrysler hearing, delaying its proposed sale to Fiat.

The Supreme Court extended the current stay on the sale to here arguments against the merger, at the behest of groups that comprise Chrysler’s senior secured lenders. The primary opponents of the deal include three Indiana employee pension funds, the widow of a Chrysler employee and several consumer advocacy organizations who filed emergency applications to the Supreme Court Saturday.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxbusiness.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automakers; bankruptcy; bho44; bhoscotus; chrysler; chryusler; scotus
WONDER, JOY AND GLORY!!!!!
1 posted on 06/08/2009 1:07:23 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libstripper

I wouldn’t be surprised to see Fiat walk on this news.


2 posted on 06/08/2009 1:08:23 PM PDT by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Cool....glad to hear that there’s some sanity left in this nation!!


3 posted on 06/08/2009 1:08:29 PM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Good! My Grandma in indiana is happy.


4 posted on 06/08/2009 1:08:48 PM PDT by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

Good !


5 posted on 06/08/2009 1:09:00 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Good news!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


6 posted on 06/08/2009 1:09:23 PM PDT by razorback-bert (We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
A roadblock to the Socialist takeover, or a road bump?

Let's hope it is the former.

7 posted on 06/08/2009 1:09:25 PM PDT by TonyInOhio ( It is hot in Suez. The dice are on the table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
on the sale to here arguments against the merger...

English is doomed.

8 posted on 06/08/2009 1:09:40 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Ruthy did this huh?

Wow.


9 posted on 06/08/2009 1:10:32 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

10 posted on 06/08/2009 1:10:40 PM PDT by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

TARP is going the way of the WPA :)


11 posted on 06/08/2009 1:10:54 PM PDT by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic one Post at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

BO will be making phone calls.


12 posted on 06/08/2009 1:12:39 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
From another thread ( Obama claims TARP issue is out of Supreme Court's authority ) SCOTUS blog reporting that according to a response filed by the Solicitor General Elena Kagan on behalf of the United States of America, no court, not even the Supreme Court, has an authority to rule on the applicability of the TARP funds, previously designated exclusively for financial company bail outs, for the Chrysler case.

Don't rattle an animal's cage before you check the lock and don't try to tell the Supreme Court that it doesn't have jurisdiction on the day you want them to pass on a case. I wouldn't be surprised if they took the case just to be able to say that they do have authority to rule on it.

13 posted on 06/08/2009 1:13:26 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

President Soetero may want to send some of his Philly Black Panther enforcers down to SCOTUS to keep the Justices on the straight and narrow.


14 posted on 06/08/2009 1:14:48 PM PDT by dogcaller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Excellent point. Which is worse, TARP or an overreaching SCOTUS.

Sigh. How did it come to this?

15 posted on 06/08/2009 1:14:53 PM PDT by MattinNJ (Sanford/Palin in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dogcaller

you’re not kiddin’!

Maybe Rahm needs to send some “refreshments” over there.


16 posted on 06/08/2009 1:16:51 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

The author of the piece made at least one little mistake. It only takes 4 justices to vote to hear a case, not 5. Let’s see, Scalia, Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kennedy - think we can get 4 votes out of that group?


17 posted on 06/08/2009 1:17:04 PM PDT by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
I could give a Sh1t less about FIAT and UAW....this is a lousy deal for US TAX PAYERS....period. We have laws in this country....regardless of who is in office! Socialism is Good for the Soul
18 posted on 06/08/2009 1:17:17 PM PDT by Fred911 (YOU GET WHAT YOU ACCEPT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Well thank God for separation of powers. My God I thought they were going to ignore this.


19 posted on 06/08/2009 1:17:19 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Out of gas become a pill box, Out of ammo become a bunker, Out of hope become a hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I’m not a lawyer, but I think Indiana’s claim isn’t about TARP funding it’s about the Obama administration stripping the contractual rights of preferred bondholders.


20 posted on 06/08/2009 1:19:16 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Lighten up, Francis. It's just a spelling glitch.

The SOUND of the word is perfect.

Shame on English for having so many of these built in potentials for screw-ups, anyway.

If you haven't guessed, English is NOT my primary language. That would be Texan, good buddy.

21 posted on 06/08/2009 1:19:53 PM PDT by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment
TARP is going the way of the WPA :)

The WPA was a lot more useful than TARP. We could at least walk on the sidewalks they built all over my home town.

And they were good for shovel sales. Particularly long handled shovels that would hold a man up as he leaned on it.

22 posted on 06/08/2009 1:20:13 PM PDT by Ole Okie (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
Maybe they didn't wake her up to actually hear what she ruled on


23 posted on 06/08/2009 1:20:50 PM PDT by Republican Red ("Anybody gone into Whole Foods lately and see what they charge for arugula?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: willgolfforfood
Lighten up, Francis.

Nice movie reference, butt your knot a 'journalist'.

24 posted on 06/08/2009 1:24:01 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

LOL!
Post ‘o the day right there.


25 posted on 06/08/2009 1:24:27 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MattinNJ
Which is worse, TARP or an overreaching SCOTUS.

Neither. Worse is an unchecked Zerobama, The One.

26 posted on 06/08/2009 1:24:56 PM PDT by Ole Okie (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
no court, not even the Supreme Court, has an authority to rule on the applicability of the TARP funds, previously designated exclusively for financial company bail outs, for the Chrysler case.

I thought that the Constitution had all matters of funding originating in the House of Representatives. When did this change to Santa in the White House?

27 posted on 06/08/2009 1:28:16 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
Schadenfreude!

28 posted on 06/08/2009 1:29:27 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

LOL... what you said.


29 posted on 06/08/2009 1:30:55 PM PDT by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment
That's right!

Schechter Poultry meet State of Indiana...

30 posted on 06/08/2009 1:31:38 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
Particularly long handled shovels that would hold a man up as he leaned on it.

One of my older cousins kept going out to work on a job, but each day they turned him down, so one day he picked up a shovel, and went to work on his own. End of the day he got paid.

The great Grand River Dam, once the longest multiple arch damn(Included for grammar freaks) in the world, was built by WPA.

31 posted on 06/08/2009 1:46:50 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
The great Grand River Dam, once the longest multiple arch damn(Included for grammar freaks) in the world, was built by WPA.

Yeah, the WPA did a lot of useful work.

And that included building new outhouses in some of the smaller towns around Oklahoma.

And (ssssh!) they built the "Holy City of the Wichitas" near Lawton, still used each year for an Easter Pageant.

32 posted on 06/08/2009 1:57:52 PM PDT by Ole Okie (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Principled

Yes, but that could just be the corn liquor.


33 posted on 06/08/2009 1:59:41 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Interesting that it would be Ginsberg that issued the stay.

Given her record, it must mean that they don’t think that the UAW gets enough out of the deal.


34 posted on 06/08/2009 2:01:13 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
And that included building new outhouses in some of the smaller towns around Oklahoma.

Wow we had to dig our own. Had a two holer, my best friend had a family of 13 kids, they had a four holer.

Schools also had outhouses since we barely had running water let alone a sewer system. Those were the days.

35 posted on 06/09/2009 9:50:42 AM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson