Skip to comments.
Stay Issued in Chrysler Sale; High Court to Hear Case
Fox News ^
| June8, 2009
| Kathryn Glass
Posted on 06/08/2009 1:07:23 PM PDT by libstripper
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued a stay in the Chrysler hearing, delaying its proposed sale to Fiat.
The Supreme Court extended the current stay on the sale to here arguments against the merger, at the behest of groups that comprise Chryslers senior secured lenders. The primary opponents of the deal include three Indiana employee pension funds, the widow of a Chrysler employee and several consumer advocacy organizations who filed emergency applications to the Supreme Court Saturday.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxbusiness.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automakers; bankruptcy; bho44; bhoscotus; chrysler; chryusler; scotus
WONDER, JOY AND GLORY!!!!!
To: libstripper
I wouldn’t be surprised to see Fiat walk on this news.
2
posted on
06/08/2009 1:08:23 PM PDT
by
Glenn
(Free Venezuela!)
To: libstripper
Cool....glad to hear that there’s some sanity left in this nation!!
3
posted on
06/08/2009 1:08:29 PM PDT
by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: libstripper
Good! My Grandma in indiana is happy.
4
posted on
06/08/2009 1:08:48 PM PDT
by
Principled
(Get the capital back! NRST!)
To: Glenn
To: libstripper
Good news!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
6
posted on
06/08/2009 1:09:23 PM PDT
by
razorback-bert
(We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.)
To: libstripper
A roadblock to the Socialist takeover, or a road bump?
Let's hope it is the former.
7
posted on
06/08/2009 1:09:25 PM PDT
by
TonyInOhio
( It is hot in Suez. The dice are on the table.)
To: libstripper
on the sale to here arguments against the merger... English is doomed.
8
posted on
06/08/2009 1:09:40 PM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: libstripper
9
posted on
06/08/2009 1:10:32 PM PDT
by
Scotswife
To: libstripper
10
posted on
06/08/2009 1:10:40 PM PDT
by
earlJam
To: libstripper
TARP is going the way of the WPA :)
11
posted on
06/08/2009 1:10:54 PM PDT
by
SecondAmendment
(Restoring our Republic one Post at a Time)
To: libstripper
BO will be making phone calls.
12
posted on
06/08/2009 1:12:39 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: libstripper
From another thread (
Obama claims TARP issue is out of Supreme Court's authority )
SCOTUS blog reporting that according to a response filed by the Solicitor General Elena Kagan on behalf of the United States of America, no court, not even the Supreme Court, has an authority to rule on the applicability of the TARP funds, previously designated exclusively for financial company bail outs, for the Chrysler case. Don't rattle an animal's cage before you check the lock and don't try to tell the Supreme Court that it doesn't have jurisdiction on the day you want them to pass on a case. I wouldn't be surprised if they took the case just to be able to say that they do have authority to rule on it.
13
posted on
06/08/2009 1:13:26 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
To: Scotswife
President Soetero may want to send some of his Philly Black Panther enforcers down to SCOTUS to keep the Justices on the straight and narrow.
To: KarlInOhio
Excellent point. Which is worse, TARP or an overreaching SCOTUS.
Sigh. How did it come to this?
15
posted on
06/08/2009 1:14:53 PM PDT
by
MattinNJ
(Sanford/Palin in 2012)
To: dogcaller
you’re not kiddin’!
Maybe Rahm needs to send some “refreshments” over there.
To: libstripper
The author of the piece made at least one little mistake. It only takes 4 justices to vote to hear a case, not 5. Let’s see, Scalia, Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kennedy - think we can get 4 votes out of that group?
To: TonyInOhio
I could give a Sh1t less about FIAT and UAW....this is a lousy deal for US TAX PAYERS....period. We have laws in this country....regardless of who is in office!
18
posted on
06/08/2009 1:17:17 PM PDT
by
Fred911
(YOU GET WHAT YOU ACCEPT)
To: libstripper
Well thank God for separation of powers. My God I thought they were going to ignore this.
19
posted on
06/08/2009 1:17:19 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Out of gas become a pill box, Out of ammo become a bunker, Out of hope become a hero.)
To: KarlInOhio
I’m not a lawyer, but I think Indiana’s claim isn’t about TARP funding it’s about the Obama administration stripping the contractual rights of preferred bondholders.
20
posted on
06/08/2009 1:19:16 PM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Lighten up, Francis. It's just a spelling glitch.
The SOUND of the word is perfect.
Shame on English for having so many of these built in potentials for screw-ups, anyway.
If you haven't guessed, English is NOT my primary language. That would be Texan, good buddy.
To: SecondAmendment
TARP is going the way of the WPA :) The WPA was a lot more useful than TARP. We could at least walk on the sidewalks they built all over my home town.
And they were good for shovel sales. Particularly long handled shovels that would hold a man up as he leaned on it.
22
posted on
06/08/2009 1:20:13 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
(American)
To: libstripper
Maybe they didn't wake her up to actually hear what she ruled on
23
posted on
06/08/2009 1:20:50 PM PDT
by
Republican Red
("Anybody gone into Whole Foods lately and see what they charge for arugula?")
To: willgolfforfood
Lighten up, Francis.Nice movie reference, butt your knot a 'journalist'.
24
posted on
06/08/2009 1:24:01 PM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Republican Red
LOL!
Post ‘o the day right there.
To: MattinNJ
Which is worse, TARP or an overreaching SCOTUS. Neither. Worse is an unchecked Zerobama, The One.
26
posted on
06/08/2009 1:24:56 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
(American)
To: KarlInOhio
no court, not even the Supreme Court, has an authority to rule on the applicability of the TARP funds, previously designated exclusively for financial company bail outs, for the Chrysler case. I thought that the Constitution had all matters of funding originating in the House of Representatives. When did this change to Santa in the White House?
To: libstripper
Schadenfreude!
28
posted on
06/08/2009 1:29:27 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
To: SecondAmendment
That's right!
Schechter Poultry meet State of Indiana...
30
posted on
06/08/2009 1:31:38 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
To: Ole Okie
Particularly long handled shovels that would hold a man up as he leaned on it. One of my older cousins kept going out to work on a job, but each day they turned him down, so one day he picked up a shovel, and went to work on his own. End of the day he got paid.
The great Grand River Dam, once the longest multiple arch damn(Included for grammar freaks) in the world, was built by WPA.
31
posted on
06/08/2009 1:46:50 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
To: itsahoot
The great Grand River Dam, once the longest multiple arch damn(Included for grammar freaks) in the world, was built by WPA. Yeah, the WPA did a lot of useful work.
And that included building new outhouses in some of the smaller towns around Oklahoma.
And (ssssh!) they built the "Holy City of the Wichitas" near Lawton, still used each year for an Easter Pageant.
32
posted on
06/08/2009 1:57:52 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
(American)
To: Principled
Yes, but that could just be the corn liquor.
To: libstripper
Interesting that it would be Ginsberg that issued the stay.
Given her record, it must mean that they don’t think that the UAW gets enough out of the deal.
To: Ole Okie
And that included building new outhouses in some of the smaller towns around Oklahoma. Wow we had to dig our own. Had a two holer, my best friend had a family of 13 kids, they had a four holer.
Schools also had outhouses since we barely had running water let alone a sewer system. Those were the days.
35
posted on
06/09/2009 9:50:42 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson