Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: USSC delays Chrysler asset sale!
CNBC Breaking News (live) ^ | 08 JUL 09 | dcbryan1

Posted on 06/08/2009 1:08:48 PM PDT by DCBryan1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-294 next last
To: Scythian
You're probably right!

If so, then fine.

LET IT BEGIN HERE AND LET IT BEGIN NOW!

There are still some folks here in Indiana who are ready to fight for what's left of the Republic.

So..... WHO WILL STAND WITH US?!

61 posted on 06/08/2009 1:25:53 PM PDT by lucyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NotSoModerate

It really isn’t conservative to look out after the little people’s pension money. It should be a bipartisan issue of law.


62 posted on 06/08/2009 1:26:56 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Come on down


63 posted on 06/08/2009 1:27:08 PM PDT by wordsofearnest (Job 19:25 As for me, I know my Redeemer lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas

I think the USSC wants to keep its power and realizes what a usurper Obama is.


64 posted on 06/08/2009 1:28:57 PM PDT by Maryhere ("HE comes to rule the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

Ginsburg? Shocking!


65 posted on 06/08/2009 1:30:09 PM PDT by DallasDeb (USAFA '06 Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

There is this pesky precedence of over 200 years of business and contract law.


66 posted on 06/08/2009 1:31:54 PM PDT by safetysign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

AP reports (hopes) stay is temporary. However, it should stand if brought before all justices.

Plea was well written by IN Attorney General. She could not ignore the request. They could not ignore that Treasury was trying to ignore existing Bankruptcy code.

The question I have is will the justices take up the issue regarding Treasury purchasing assets from entities other than financial institutions?


67 posted on 06/08/2009 1:32:44 PM PDT by vg0va3 (I don't plan to quit the fight until it is finally over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; LucyT; BP2

GO HOOSIERS!


68 posted on 06/08/2009 1:34:38 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Wow, Ginsburg bitched slapped Barry.

I wonder what Zero is going to do if SCOTUS rules against him. He’s not use to being told no.


69 posted on 06/08/2009 1:35:22 PM PDT by Ticonderoga34 (A Community Organizer is the 21st century version of a Ward Heeler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasDeb
Can we make Ruthie an honorary FReeper, at least for a day?

“Constitution” and “rule of law” are concepts that still mean something in America!

70 posted on 06/08/2009 1:35:30 PM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: vg0va3

Dunno what is next, but the republic will survive this day. For a while there, it looked like it would not.


71 posted on 06/08/2009 1:35:43 PM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Qoud licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
It really isn’t conservative to look out after the little people’s pension money. It should be a bipartisan issue of law.

Obama's view happens to be better than "bi-partisan", it's "beyond politics". What dictators call, "the will of the people", known only by the great Obama and his unique perspective as a black organizer. He will heal our souls, you'll see. But first he must fix that pesky problem: SCOTUS. It's all written in "dictators for dummies".

72 posted on 06/08/2009 1:35:53 PM PDT by NotSoModerate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

It’s one small battle in the war.

Obama has been issuing statements as if he is the CEO of Congress. I am surprised Congress has allowed or tolerated it. I am not surprised at Ginsburg’s ruling. I thought arguing SCOTUS had no jurisdiction was a mistake. After further review, they just might side with odumba.

Time will tell if this was just a remind-him-he-is-not-the-boss of-us smackdown.

I might add one important point: my opinion is based on absolutely no knowledge of the law. :-)


73 posted on 06/08/2009 1:36:10 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

So odious that even Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg couldn’t hide the stench. (with apologies to Ms. Buzzi).


74 posted on 06/08/2009 1:36:15 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("I've conquered my goddam willpower." Don Marquis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

TOTUS dissed by SCOUTS......

Oops!


75 posted on 06/08/2009 1:37:04 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton

Ginsburg better lock her doors tonight and get her cats in fast....


76 posted on 06/08/2009 1:37:19 PM PDT by libscum (don't sit out- vote Mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...
And you’ll have one person to thank for it. MITCH DANIELS....

~~~~

AND the great attorney for the secured creditors, Tom Lauria, describing the White House threats.

mentioned by Mark Levin who plays Lauria's interview.

Interesting sidenote:

Pierella Weinberg, a secured creditor, is allegedly the firm that backpeddled from discussing the threats they were getting from the White House to take this deal or else. I'm assuming they were 'persuaded' into that move by their former employee, RAHM EMANUEL, who worked for them for about 2-1/2 years and made over $16M.

77 posted on 06/08/2009 1:37:25 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

“A top Obama administration lawyer urged the Supreme Court on Monday to allow Chrysler’s bankruptcy to proceed, noting that the needs of the economy outweigh the needs of the deal’s detractors.”

Translated: The needs of the collective outweigh individual rights and the rule of law.


78 posted on 06/08/2009 1:38:03 PM PDT by keepitreal (Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan
I wouldn’t read too much into this

Don't read too little into this. Nearly all of requests for certs are denied outright. Not only are there constitutional issues of first impression here, but the bankruptcy court put existing law on its head with its ruling. This the perfect type of case for the Supreme Court to clarify the law.

I think the odds are better than 50-50 the court will take this case.

79 posted on 06/08/2009 1:38:41 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

Ginsberg and the rest of SCOTUS better get their pets into protective custody very soon....


80 posted on 06/08/2009 1:39:40 PM PDT by libscum (don't sit out- vote Mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-294 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson