Skip to comments.Groundbreaking Set for New Jersey Transit Tunnel Under Hudson
Posted on 06/08/2009 4:30:45 PM PDT by ml/nj
New Jersey officials have been planning the next train tunnel under the Hudson River for so long that it is already on its third name. This month, work is scheduled to begin on the Mass Transit Tunnel formerly known as the Trans-Hudson Express and, before that, Access to the Regions Core more than 15 years after it was conceived.
A ceremonial groundbreaking was set for Monday alongside a highway in North Bergen, N.J., the site of the first small piece of what could be the biggest transit project in the country. The tunnel, which is expected to take eight years to complete, bears a current price tag of $8.7 billion. That is about $6 billion less than the so-called Big Dig highway tunnel in Boston cost but about $6 billion more than the projects original price.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
I've lived in Northern NJ for the past 35+ years. I live about a half hour west of Manhattan and go into the city probably as often as anyone who doesn't work there. I was conditioned during my youth growing up on Long Island a similar distance from the city to regularly use the Long Island Railroad. But I have NEVER taken a train into Manhatten from NJ. Not only that, but with the exception of my wife who used the train for a few months while working in NYC, I do not know anyone who has ever even talked about using one of the trains. (Correction: My daughter took a train out of the city on 9/12 when all she wanted to do was get out of there, and I picked her up at a station a convenient 35 minutes away from our house.) The closest line to me is a "commuter" line which means they have one track and they only have eastbound trains in the morning and westbound trains in the evening. I'm not sure whether this is still true but the trains used to only go to Hoboken, NJ, from where one had to take a PATH train (glorified subway) which only has a half dozen stations in NYC. From what I understand some people actually use the Big Dig Tunnel.
This is a boondoggle which will make the Big Dig look like the Little Dipper.
Politicians will spend recklessly until we toss them out of office.
Does the Mob have job listings?
This tunnel, however, is woefully unecessary. The old Penn railroad tunnel is more than sufficient for current needs.
Big Dig II
No! REALLY NO!
Trains used to be built by private business, that had or tried to have some sense of the return on the investment they were making. The politicians who build these railroads have a different sort of return on investment in mind.
Eight years to build? As a goobermint contract, likely longer. The original tunnels, still in use and built by the Pennsylvania Railroad about a hundred years ago (William Wallace Atterbury I think was the president of the PRR at the time) took nowhere near that long.
No, it was Alexander Cassatt. Atterbury was president of the Pennsy when the Northeast Corridor was electrified in the early Thirties.
Lincoln tunnel took three years in the thirties.
These are the times that try men's souls, if they have any brains anyway.
They think this is going to re-habilitate corzine.
The approaches took 4 years, started in 1933, contractors for the various sections were George M Brewster & Son, Porier-McLane, B. Perini & Sons and Clinton Asphalt Co.
That segment of the Northeast Corridor Line has been running beyond its operational capacity for years -- basically since they instituted the Midtown Direct service in the mid-1990s.
I doubt anyone living where I do now used a train in 1950 either. When I use public transit, I take a bus which doesn't use any Interstate highways at all. My guess is that only a small percentage of the buses that go into NYC from NJ are ever on an Interstate, not counting the absurd designation of the helix into the Lincoln Tunnel as I-495.
The biggest challenge is squeezing the additional tracks and new station platforms into the area adjacent to the existing Penn Station in Manhattan. Most people have no idea how costly and time-consuming it is to do a construction project underground in a place where you have to work around existing infrastructure and utilities and reinforce building foundations as you go along.
I am involved in the estimate preparation for one of the Joint Ventures, this is a Design/Build project...NO EXTRA'S...make me a tunnel from here to here (under river portion is in mud)and the land portions are in rock.
The NY station will cost as much as the under river section.
And for the ‘the Contractors are ripping us off crowd’ the only reason the Contractors are taking the tremendous risks of bidding and building this tunnel is TO MAKE A PROFIT, risk and reward theory...remember that in school
They have real customers, people that work but don’t want to live in high-density high-tax NYC, so it’s not a boondoggle. It’s a logical increase in capacity, driven by a dislike of leftist life in NYC. I don’t understand your hostility. It’s pro-family and will increase NJ property values. I moved to NJ last year for job reasons and recently bought a house that is walking distance to a NJ commuter train station into Manhattan, so I’m biased the other way. I’d be anti-growth if NJ was a beautiful Shangri la where I wanted to retire, but it was paved over long ago.
I didn't say that no one rode a train. I said no one I know rides the train. You already ride you said. So how is the new tunnel going to help you? Do you get a seat? Does anyone stand on your train? I don't know.
You also said you haven't been here long. So you might not be aware that NJ has been drawing businesses away from NYC because of the congestion and high rents there. If it becomes easier to travel into NYC some of that impetus goes away.
But I don't think it will become easier to get into NYC. This new tunnel is a boondoggle of historic proportion. They say it's been on the drawing board for 15 years, so obviously it's been rejected quite a few times by now. There's a reason.
Figure out how many new riders you think it might draw and divide it into $8.7 bil PLUS the cost of the new infrastructure to support the new riders and let me know how many centuries it will be before it even SEEMS like a good deal.
Those trains, at least the midtown direct line is PACKED. Get a seat? No. Lucky to squeeze on to stand on many of them. There’s been no additional capacity available - the tunnel and lines are shared with Amtrack, and they can’t schedule more trains through it.
The railroads had to build their ‘road’ the trucking companies did not, Uncle Sam did, the Interstate system killed the railroads.
The only time I typically see issues with congestion is at peak period, when trains are often held TWICE, once at the old "Manhattan Transfer" in Harrison/Kearny and then again at the west side cut right before you pull into Penn Station proper. Nevertheless, I don't really see that that justifies a second tunnel.
Don't. I did recently, the first time in a number of years. It was the most unpleasant train ride I think I ever took. The train was rattly and dirty, the tracks were in terrible condition, and the conductress was stupid and arrogant. She took my ticket and minutes later accused me of not having one.
Only about half of the commuter trains, the ones to Bergen, Passaic, Essex, Union, Morris Somerset and Hunterdon Counties went to Hoboken and the PATH trains (and, in the old days, the ferry boats, now returned, I hear). The trains to downtown Newark, Elizabeth, Middlesex, Mercer, and Monmouth Counties went thru downtown Newark (intersecting the other PATH line) and into Penn Station (meeting the Long Island RR). That line is also the mainline of Amtrak, including the Acela and Metroliner trains.
When I was growing up, making that run meant a real train, most often pulled by a magnificent General Electric GG1 locomotive. The ride was smooth and quiet, the cars were clean, and the staff was competent and courteous.
Next time, I will take the bus.
You're right. After running the numbers it doesn't make any financial sense. At least they are spending our money on a hard asset used and built by working people, rather than wasting it on non-workers. This puts a serious $8.7 billion hole in the march to socialism.
Okay. 2000 working people at $150K per year for ten years is 3 Bil. Don't tell me the other 5.7 Bil is for materials! It's for non-workers.
(And I think it would be really tough to have 2000 people working at the same time on a tunnel.)
Biden gaffe: New rail tunnel being built for cars?
NJ .com | 6/9/09 | Herb Jackson
Posted on 06/08/2009 10:55:03 PM PDT by pissant
Work starts on $8.7b N.Y.-N.J. tunnel
boston | June 9, 2009
Posted on 06/09/2009 4:54:56 AM PDT by JoeProBono
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.