Posted on 06/09/2009 5:10:38 PM PDT by madprof98
Second is that you've invoked one of the Christian heresies, though its name escapes me right now. (K?) Alternative to that, you're enticing me into false disbelief/action for purposes of proselytizing. Not OK.
Are you denying Saul as a credible witness to Christianity? Okay, he's better known as Paul, but... I find that in our nominally Christian culture many of our strongest proponents are converts -- they KNOW life elsewhere.
Such as a Christian (convert) friend who spent time in prison in a Middle-Eastern country for being caught smuggling much-desired Bibles into the country. The next time God intervened -- what a story he has to tell, with photos!
Me too. Students who were raised in a Christian home, but become brainwashed by leftist college professors, are among the most arrogant leftists around. They're far worse than kids who were raised as left-wingers. They go out of their way to humiliate their friends and relatives, rambling on and on about how backward and stupid they are, and how enlightened they themselves are for "growing" and rejecting their parents' beliefs.
You can pray for and hope for the conversion of any number of pro-abortion butchers, we are called on to do exactly that, no more and no less.
We are not expected to pray for, or wish such murderous souls long life, blessings and success in all of their ventures, nor are we to compromise and/or condone their wickedness.
God is good. Tiller is dead. I say ‘Good for God’.
“Proud little murderess.”
Actually, she hasn’t murdered anyone yet. She just aspires to be a murderess. How nice...
The author seems naively unconcerned about mens’ part in abortion. The rate at which boyfriends and embarrassed parents pressure women to have an abortion makes reproductive freedom a joke in many cases. I heard a statistic awhile back about the largest cause of death among single pregnant women is murder (but don’t quote me because I can’t remember the specifics.) You are free to do what you want with your body as long as it’s not carrying the child to term and forcing the sperm donor to face fatherhood.
Also, the author is a chicken. She can talk about all sorts of serious stuff to complete strangers, but lacks the nerve to speak of it to her own parents. She dares not try to understand why they cling to their convictions, despite all the “enlightenment” that is available to them. What a fake. I’d be sick at heart to have a child like that.
Reproductive health care can mean only one thing, i.e., enhancing the health and effectiveness of one's reproductive organs. Abortion and contraception do not achieve this. So they have absolutely nothing to do with reproductive health care. It would be so refreshing if these people would just be honest.
“It would be so refreshing if these people would just be honest.”
Yep. “choice”, “fetal tissue”, “terminate”, “reproductive health”. The web of euphemisms is evidence of how wrong it is. Lately, I’m pondering substituting “crush and flush” whenever I see “abortion” or “termination”.
I don’t like to resort to religious imagery when advocating on this issue because I think the case should be made for life on terms that are universal to believers and non-believers. But for me personally, it’s so easy to see the Father of Lies’ influence in obscuring and deflecting the truth about abortion, the abortion industry, and what really goes on with “choice”.
If I discovered my child was going to med school to become an abortionist, you can bet that they would not receive another penny from me, whether for school or for anything else. And that is just for starters. If this "womyns" parents continue to pay her way, they will be complicit in her murders.
I’ve seen them in ICU septic and near death since legalized abortion.
Also seen them with perforated bowl and perforated uterus.
I know what I’D do with those 20+ weeks - I’d love, rock, sing to, talk to, cuddle and feel a living, breathing child, knowing full well that all I had was those 20 weeks. But those 20 weeks would be shared with a healthy baby! Why would I WANT to shorten that time with my baby if that’s all I had left with them? Does a mother not do all of these things and more when their child is expected to be born healthy? So I’ll never see my child’s face until just before s/he dies, (except they say ultrasound is wicked good nowadays, so maybe I could anyway), I’ll still feel my child move, kick, hiccup, know s/he is sucking their thumb, laughing, doing somersaults, whatever. It’s 20+ weeks I won’t ever have again! Why should I kill him/her in the cruelest way possible when I already grieve that s/he will die anyway?? At least I’ll share 20 more weeks with my precious child and then live my life without the added burden of the trauma of knowing I killed my own child in the cruelest way possible! I’ll grieve either way, but I’ll have God to comfort my grief, as well as 20 weeks I wouldn’t have had otherwise and all the firm assurance that God stands WITH us, as we cradle our dying child, once truly born. Dead is dead. The manner of which is what one is left to deal with the rest of their lives. I’ll take God’s way, thank you very much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.