>>They just have a problem proving any of the theory that they push as “science.”<<
Billions of data points, millions of practitioners, the entire breadth of the bio-science industries and complete adherence to scientific principles.
There is more proof for TToE than there is for the Thoery of Gravity (not the phenomenon).
TToE has specific observed applications, or have you never heard of viral adaptation?
If there is an alternative Scientific Theory, publish it here and the world is your oyster.
“Billions of data points, millions of practitioners, the entire breadth of the bio-science industries and complete adherence to scientific principles.
There is more proof for TToE than there is for the Thoery of Gravity (not the phenomenon).
TToE has specific observed applications, or have you never heard of viral adaptation?
If there is an alternative Scientific Theory, publish it here and the world is your oyster.”
So are you saying that scientific principles are not being applied to evolutionary theory, because you certainly have not pulled together any of those billions of data points to reproduce a single example of one transitional form leading to another different specie. There are absolutely no sequencing of transitional forms.