Skip to comments.White Supremacist Murderer Was a Social Darwinist
Posted on 06/15/2009 7:24:47 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
June 14, 2009 David Klinghoffer on Evolution News and Views has pointed out that James von Brunn, the man who murdered guard Tyrone Johns at Washingtons Holocaust Museum on June 10, was motivated by ideas of natural selection and eugenics. Klinghoffer provided additional information on Belief.Net with quotes from Brunns writings. He also found hundreds of references to...
(Excerpt) Read more at creationsafaris.com ...
Just in case you guys are interested.
All the best—GGG
and people say creationist are intolerant....
Goodness Gwascious! What will Little Green Footballs say with its constant attacks on creationism?
Very interested, thank you for posting this.
That’s what the Evos call those who call for an open and honest debate between Creation vs. Evolution, or Intelligent Design vs. Evolution. After all, Darwin’s unobservable, unrepeatable materialist creation myth is settled science, just like global warming! Get with the program buddy!!!!
Didn’t you already post this? Wasn’t it already posted to you that most racist freaks like is are occultist or white nationalists into the Christian Identity movement (not Christian and/or based on science at all)? Wasn’t it already pointed out that by Godwin’s law, you are resorting to disparate measures in to making this some sort of evolutionary debate, you have lost the debate by your disparate stretch?
Absolutely nothing...unless it is to spit fire at those who dare point out that Mr. WSP (White Supremacist Murderer) was in fact a...(dare I say the words?)...social Darwinist.
Same topic, different article. Enjoy :o)
Glad to be of service. For more, click on keyword “creation.”
All the best—GGG
No telling except zero will somehow be praised over the whole thing over there. Man have they gone out in left field.
im actually a creationist because i believe God createdus??? whats ur problem
What is about what I said that makes you think there is a problem?
It was also pointed out that he was a Liberty Lobby fan.
In the early days of FR, articles from Liberty Lobby, as well as Carol on the Web, were often posted on FR. Eventually, both were banned at FR.
Thanks for the ping!
I’m trying to figure out how someone can be both a social darwinist and a socialist. Most socialist seek to use the state to compensate for darwinistic aspects of society.
I mean, if one were going to leave success and failure up to nature, then why bother with the welfare state or socialism?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.