Posted on 06/18/2009 3:46:35 AM PDT by Man50D
The Justice Department confirmed last week that FBI agents in Afghanistan are reading Miranda warnings to suspected terrorists captured there, a practice that Republican congressmen this week branded as "crazy" and "stupid."
Miranda warnings were mandated by a U.S. Supreme Court decision that said domestic law enforcement agencies must inform criminal suspects arrested in the United States of their rights under the 5th Amendment.
"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law," says the typical Miranda warning. "You have the right to an attorney present during questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights?"
The Obama administration's decision to make this statement to terror suspects captured on the battlefield in a foreign country has sparked outrage among several Republicans Congress who spoke with CNSNews.com. It also contradicts what President Barack Obama said in March, when he indicated that Miranda rights did not apply to terror suspects captured overseas.
Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), as first reported in The Weekly Standard, said he was recently in Afghanistan and personally witnessed FBI agents reading the Miranda warning to captured combatants.
I was a little surprised to find it taking place when I showed up because we hadnt been briefed on it, I didnt know about it, said Rogers. Were still trying to get to the bottom of it, but it is clearly a part of this new global justice initiative.
Anytime that you offer confusion in that environment thats already chaotic and confusing enough, you jeopardize a soldiers life, said Rogers.
On Capitol Hill, Rep. John Boozman (R-Ark.) agreed with Rogers and told CNSNews.com: I think its the craziest idea Ive ever heard in my life, and I think my constituents at home in Arkansas are beyond shock. Theres just no rhyme or reason for it -- it makes no sense at all. We have so many guys that are out there risking their lives, trying to do the best they can, and then to try to put this added burden on them at a time when youre at war -- like I said its crazy. Its beyond belief.
Rep. Sam Johnson (R-Texas) also disagreed with the policy of reading the Miranda warning to captured enemy fighters. I think its a terrible, its a terrible idea. Theyre not American citizens, for starters. Theyre combating-foreigners that are against us in every way. They dont even wear the uniform, most of them. Theyre terrorists. And they should not have the same privileges as the citizens of the United States. Thats where I stand, Johnson told CNSNews.com.
Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) strongly disapproved of giving these rights to detainees saying, I think its outrageous. Theyre not criminal defendants, and if thats the way this administration is heading, I think its a terrible direction.
Theyre not criminal defendants, theyre enemies of war captured on the battlefield, and they need to be treated as such, said McCaul. What were doing is going back to the Clinton years and going through the courts and making criminal defendants, reading them Miranda rights, theyre asking for lawyers over in Afghanistan on the battlefield. Whether theyre down in Guantanamo, I saw Khalid Sheik Mohammad down there. Hes an enemy of the United States, an enemy of war. And the idea of giving them Constitutional rights, bringing them into the United States and giving them Constitutional rights is just outrageous. To extend that to the battlefield now, where theyre being captured in a time of war, and force our soldiers to give them Miranda rights, weve never seen this in the history of this country, and its a bad, dangerous precedent to go down.
Rep. John Carter (R-Texas), whose nickname on Capitol Hill is Judge for having served criminal district judge for 20 years prior to entering Congress, said that a terrorist act should be treated differently than a DUI.
I spent 20 years as a criminal district judge, and I firmly believe that they [captured terrorists] are not entitled to have Miranda rights. Their rights are defined in other ways, they are not defined by our Constitution, said Carter. They are treating these people as if they are committing a crime inside the United States, and not as warriors against our soldiers, Carter told CNSNews.com. And yet they are warriors against our military.
Rep. Robert A. Brady (D-Pa.) said he was not familiar with the new policy and therefore could not comment. I havent seen that -- if I see it, I can comment on it, but I dont know anything about it, he told CNSNews.com.
President Barack Obama was interviewed on CBSs 60 Minutes on March 22. During that interview he was asked about the captured terror suspects being held in Guantanamo Bay. Obama said: The whole premise of Guantanamo, promoted by Vice President Cheney, was that somehow the American system of justice was not up to the task of dealing with these terrorists. I fundamentally disagree with that. Now, do these folks deserve Miranda rights? Do they deserve to be treated like a shoplifter down the block? Of course not.
Bet Ms. Linseed Graham thinks it’s a wonderful idea.
If Miranda rights are being read in Afghanistan, then someone gave the order to do it. There is a bigger story here, and that story is who gave the order. We need to know this, for this practice is insane.
If the GOP congressmen would stop wailing about non-issues, and start taking this so called president to the mat on things like the fired Auditor Walprin, perhaps something useful might come out of it.
Due process is due process. Who cares if it is implemented?
The enormity of this issue can not be over stated. This is so crazy it defies explanation.
Thank you. It is insane and we know full well who gave the orders. The anti-American occupying the WH.
It's REALLY that simple.
will they be forced to sit in the comfy chair?
the islamo-ragheads must be either laughing their heads off at the idiocy being displayed.
BTTT
By reading them their Miranda rights, you are implying they have the same rights of American citizens.
I care.
Putting terrorists up on tropical islands is crazy too.
Will this practice inevitably result in fewer enemy combatants being killed instead of captured?
Yeah, I saw afterwards that it was about terrorists apprehended in A-stan. My bad. Anyway, I say that theres already so much to nail this admin on, that the GOP is doing terribly at.
They need to step up to the plate, and play the role of a responsible opposition, by pointing out this admins many flaws.
Reading Miranda Rights to Captured Terrorists ‘Most Outrageous Notion I Have Ever Heard,’ Says...
this Marine Corps Viet Nam war combat veteran.
Semper Fi,
Kelly
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.