Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia prepared to shoot down N Korea missile: military
Indopia ^ | June 19

Posted on 06/19/2009 5:17:33 AM PDT by maquiladora

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: maquiladora

What the hell is wrong with the world when you agree with russia’s leader more than your own? First Putin’s Davos speech warning the US against trending toward socialism and now pro missile defense.....the whole world is backwards...


21 posted on 06/19/2009 5:39:26 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley
The Russians are famous for bluffing with a seven high busted straight, knowing full well that lil Kim’ll never call them. That missile has as much chance of “straying” over Russian Territory as it does of making a soft landing on Phobos.
22 posted on 06/19/2009 5:40:36 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (AGWT is very robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it at the 100% confidence level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
The Soviets had an anti-missile system ringing Moscow since the 1970s.

The first real and successful ABM hit-to-kill test was conducted by the Soviet PVO forces on March 1, 1961. An experimental V-1000 missile (part of the "A" ABM programme) launched from the Sary-Shagan test range, destroyed a dummy warhead released by a R-12 ballistic missile launched from the Kapustin Yar cosmodrome. The dummy warhead was destroyed by the impact of 18 thousand tungsten-carbide spherical impactors 140 seconds after launch, at an altitude of 25 km. The V-1000 missile system was nonetheless considered not reliable enough and abandoned in favor of nuclear-tipped ABMs.

The only other ICBM ABM system to reach production was the Soviet A-35 system. It was initially a single-layer exoatmospheric (outside the atmosphere) design, using the Galosh (SH-01/ABM-1) interceptor. It was deployed at four sites around Moscow in the early 1970s.

Originally intended to be a larger deployment, the system was downsized to the two sites allowed under the 1972 ABM treaty. It was upgraded in the 1980s to a two-layer system, the A-135. The Gorgon (SH-11/ABM-4) long-range missile was designed to handle intercepts outside the atmosphere, and the Gazelle (SH-08/ABM-3) short-range missile endoatmospheric intercepts that eluded Gorgon. ABM-3 was considered to be technologically equivalent to the United States Safeguard system of the 1970s

23 posted on 06/19/2009 5:55:39 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

I think Russia is only looking for an excuse to show off some firepower.


24 posted on 06/19/2009 6:54:43 AM PDT by freebird5850 (O-Bomba is not the Messia. Jesus was a carpenter and could build a cabinet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freebird5850

Why don’t we do the same? Tell North Korea that if it gets close to the USA we will shoot it down?


25 posted on 06/19/2009 7:32:59 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

Barry won’t do that, after all that apologizing he’s done running around the world he’s gotta keep face, ‘ya know.


26 posted on 06/19/2009 7:43:04 AM PDT by freebird5850 (O-Bomba is not the Messia. Jesus was a carpenter and could build a cabinet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Russia has the S-300, the S-400, and for taking on MIRV’d ICBM’s, a nuclear tipped warhead interceptor system. And that doesn’t include any satellite or laser weaponry the Russians have at their disposal.


27 posted on 06/19/2009 7:57:18 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

Thanks for the reference.


28 posted on 06/20/2009 5:37:20 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson