Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In ruling, Supreme Court says religion deserves greater protection (Texas)
Austin American-Statesman ^ | Saturday, June 20, 2009 | Chuck Lindell

Posted on 06/20/2009 11:11:09 AM PDT by Hawk720

Continuing to show deference to religious practice in Texas, the state Supreme Court ruled Friday that a town near Corpus Christi violated state law when it zoned two Christian halfway houses out of existence.

In a 9-0 ruling, the court said the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act entitles faith-based operations to greater legal protection than similar secular operations.

The ruling — the court's first look at the 1999 religious freedom act — means cities will have to prove that zoning laws affecting religious activities are the least restrictive way to further a "compelling" government function, such as providing for public safety. That test, developed under First Amendment case law, is intended to be difficult to meet.

"This means that in zoning cases, you have to give churches special treatment," said Hiram Sasser, litigation director for Liberty Legal Institute, a conservative nonprofit group that advocates for religious rights and that appealed the case.

"You have to have very special reasons for telling a church you can't locate here and locate there. That's going to be a tough burden for cities," Sasser said. "This is going to be an important tool for churches, synagogues, mosques and all types of religious institutions."

(Excerpt) Read more at statesman.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/20/2009 11:11:10 AM PDT by Hawk720
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

Battle won but the war is ongoing.


2 posted on 06/20/2009 11:17:00 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

bookmark


3 posted on 06/20/2009 11:20:12 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720
"This means that in zoning cases, you have to give churches special treatment," said Hiram Sasser, litigation director for Liberty Legal Institute, a conservative nonprofit group that advocates for religious rights and that appealed the case.

Another case where IMO people are not thinking things through, the problem with special rights for religious institutions is that constitutionally you can't discriminate between religions - a lot of the people who think this is a wonderful decision by the court may feel a bit differently when they find they can't block the establishment of a mosque and madrasah down the street from their houses.

4 posted on 06/20/2009 12:36:21 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas
... a lot of the people who think this is a wonderful decision by the court may feel a bit differently when they find they can't block the establishment of a mosque and madrasah down the street from their houses.

I won't comment since you've said it so eloquently.

5 posted on 06/20/2009 1:20:27 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

Watch for the Moose Limbs to jump in and comadseer this one - they use our own laws (and airplanes) against us.


6 posted on 06/20/2009 1:20:55 PM PDT by RoadTest (For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus - I Tim 2:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

commandeer


7 posted on 06/20/2009 1:21:39 PM PDT by RoadTest (For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus - I Tim 2:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas

In this case, the ministry that was wanting to move in was two halfway houses. I can understand why people were concerned about them moving into their neighborhoods. But this ministry will have to be allowed in now.


8 posted on 06/20/2009 1:48:57 PM PDT by Hawk720
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Battle won but the war is ongoing.

The many headed serpent of Islam will take this sensible ruling to nonsensical extremes in short order.

9 posted on 06/20/2009 1:55:33 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

SITREP


10 posted on 06/20/2009 2:32:22 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (When do the impeachment proceedings begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

I don’t necesarily think that religious things should have special treatment but property rights should not be violated. I don’t think any area should be rezoned unless 100% of the owners agree. I hate when they change the rules in the middle of the game


11 posted on 06/20/2009 11:03:22 PM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson