Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Accelerating Push to Criminalize the Right
The New American ^ | 6/20/09

Posted on 06/21/2009 5:16:26 AM PDT by FromLori

The New American recently warned that Americans who oppose policies emanating from Washington are being tarred as right-wing extremists and even potential terrorists by the Obama administration's Department of Homeland Security as well as by the New York Times and other liberal media organs. This push to demonize and even criminalize political dissent appears to be accelerating.

Earlier this month, New York Times columnists Frank Rich and Paul Krugman wrote pieces laying the blame for the murder of an abortionist and a U.S. Holocaust Museum security guard at the foot of President Barack Obama's critics. Both have received figurative high-fives from the left-wing blogosphere. The Huffington Post’s Dennis Palumbo called Rich’s column “gripping” and added: “What is news ... is the unchecked level of rancor, and the seeming lack of interest in how this wave of hate-speech may well contribute to more tragedies.” DailyKos.com reposted the money quotes from Rich’s column in several places and defended Paul Krugman’s column “The Big Hate.” The leftist People for the American Way essentially seconded the columns. Columnists from the New York Daily News and Salon.com published similar sentiments. The Rev. Jesse Jackson took up the familiar gun-control theme in the Chicago Sun-Times.

The chorus of New York Times columnists calling for silencing the right reached a trifecta with Bob Hebert’s June 19 column, “A Threat We Can’t Ignore.” Hebert’s piece had a naked message to anyone criticizing Obama: Shut up. The focus of Hebert’s rage was the rather mild actions by the National Rifle Association to set up a website to oppose any efforts by the Obama administration to ban firearms in violation of the Constitution’s Second Amendment. “While the N.R.A. is not advocating violence," Hebert acknowledged, "it shouldn’t take more than a glance at the newspapers to understand why this is a message that the country could do without.”

Shut up, he politely explained. You have the right to dissent with policy opinions only when a Republican is in the White House, as far as the New York Times editorial page is concerned. Hebert claimed that the NRA website was unnecessary. “There is no Obama gun ban on the way,” he wrote. However, he concluded his column by proposing the following solution to the current crisis: “The first step should be to bring additional gun control back into the policy mix.” That’s logic, New York Times-style.

While Hebert and his New York Times colleagues didn’t explicitly call for government censorship, none of them put vigorous criticism of Obama into the category of constitutionally protected free speech either. Of the NRA, Hebert says “you can sure blame it for ignoring the tragic lessons of history and continuing to spray gasoline into an environment that we have seen explode time and again.” Let the reader project the line to where such argumentation is heading.

This whole public discussion about the dangers of dissent originated in a Department of Homeland Security report entitled “Right Wing Extremism.” Released in May, the report said that there was no organized right-wing terrorism but that there is a danger in “lone wolf” killers being incited to commit deadly acts. The DHS report echoes a FBI program under the Justice Department called “Operation Vigilant Eagle.” Who are the would-be lone-wolf killers? Who is inciting them? According to the organized left and government officials, anyone who criticizes policies emanating from Washington is an “extremist” and is worthy of a watchful eye from law enforcement at best and of being considered a terrorism danger at worst. "Lone-wolf offenders continue to be of great concern to law enforcement," the Wall Street Journal reported June 15.

Whenever a crazed killer gives a political motivation, officials always try to place the blame at the feet of its own critics. "Hate speech" can be loosely defined as speech politicians hate. It makes no difference whether the critic is on the political “left” or “right.” The Department of Homeland Security also sought to demonize left-wing critics of Washington policies with its own report on “Leftwing Extremists,” which was written shortly before the report on “Rightwing Extremism.”

Even if a killer doesn’t provide a motivation, journalists always clamor for a reason for any particularly senseless killing. This idiotic tendency of the press was satirized by musician/songwriter Bob Geldof in his 1979 hit song “I Don’t Like Mondays.” The song is about a schoolyard shooting that same year by 16-year-old Brenda Ann Spencer in San Diego, California. After shooting and killing two school officials and injuring eight schoolmates and a police officer, a reporter asked her why she did it. She replied “I don't like Mondays, this livens up the day.” Geldof’s unforgettable lyrics satirize a conversation between dopey reporters incessantly asking why she did it and the girl’s father, who had no answer:

He can see no reasons, ‘cause there are no reasons. What reason do you need to be shown? Tell me why! I don’t like Mondays. Tell me why! I don’t like Mondays. Tell me why! I don’t like Mondays. I want to shoot the whole day down.

Crazy doesn’t need a reason.

But that doesn’t mean government officials and a compliant press won’t invent one, if it can help stifle dissent.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: 0bama; 0bamaisfailing; 1984; 65grendel; atlasshrugged; bigteapartyjuly4; bitterwhiteguy; clinger; constitution; dissent; donttreadonme; drillbabydrill; frankrich; freespeech; givemeliberty; gunbans; idiocracy; ignoranceisstrength; krugman; liberalfascism; livefreeordie; madashell; newamerican; newnuclearnow; nocrisiswasted; progressivism; takebackamerica; tanstaafl; time2partyagain; truthmatters0; warispeace

1 posted on 06/21/2009 5:16:26 AM PDT by FromLori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Progressives? Progressing towards what?


2 posted on 06/21/2009 5:25:33 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Who is Hugh Series?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

I’m wondering if this is behind the reason THE ONE doesn’t condemn the mullahs in Iran on this fraudulent election....


3 posted on 06/21/2009 5:29:38 AM PDT by Achilles Heel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Achilles Heel

Scary thought I would be worried I am worried.


4 posted on 06/21/2009 5:31:35 AM PDT by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Achilles Heel

could it be Obama is slow to condemn Iran’s elections is because they Mullahs used the same fraud computer software as obama/democrats/acorn used to steal votes?


5 posted on 06/21/2009 5:31:48 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Do You honestly believe that all the times democrats have been monitoring elections around the world it was done to ensure that the votes were counted correctly?

They were testing different methods on how to “rock the Vote”


6 posted on 06/21/2009 5:35:24 AM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

No doubt that’s where we’re headed. Keep it polished and clean...and loaded.


7 posted on 06/21/2009 5:38:31 AM PDT by Dallas59 ("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Anyone Remember Hillarys’ Screed about Debate ?
Anyone,
Bueller,
Bueller.


8 posted on 06/21/2009 5:41:16 AM PDT by bravotu (Have a Nice Day !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Achilles Heel
I’m wondering if this is behind the reason THE ONE doesn’t condemn the mullahs in Iran on this fraudulent election...

The reason, IMO, is that Ahmadinejad is a friend of Russia.

http://www.kansascity.com/451/story/1254226.html
______________________________________________________

From CBS-News, July 29, 2006:

Chavez Vows To 'Stand By Iran'
After Oil Talks In Tehran, Venezuelan Leader Called 'Brother' By Ahmedinejad

Photobucket

"Chavez pledged that his country would 'stay by Iran at any time and under any condition,' state television reported. Ahmadinejad said he saw in Chavez a kindred spirit." "'We do not have any limitation in cooperation,' Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying. 'Iran and Venezuela are next to each other and supporters of each other. Chavez is a source of a progressive and revolutionary current in South America and his stance in restricting imperialism is tangible.'":
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/29/world/main1847331.shtml
______________________________________________________

Photobucket
President Obama and Venezuela dictator Hugo
Chavez at the 2009 Summit of the Americas in Trinidad

Obama, Chavez shake hands at Americas Summit:
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97KK2T00&show_article=1
______________________________________________________

From National Public Radio (NPR):
August 29, 2006
"Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has been visiting countries such as China, Iran and Russia as part of an effort to build a 'strategic alliance' of interests not beholden to the United States. He considers the United States his arch enemy.":
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5729764
______________________________________________________

Russia's Medvedev hails "comrade" Obama

Associated Foreign Press (AFP) ^ | April 2, 2009 | Anna Smolchenko

"Russia's Dmitry Medvedev hailed Barack Obama as "my new comrade" Thursday after their first face-to-face talks"

http://www.france24.com/en/20090402-russias-medvedev-hails-comrade-obama

April 1, 2009:
"Obama, Medvedev pledge new era of relations":
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090401/wl_afp/usrussiadiplomacynuclear_20090401152002

9 posted on 06/21/2009 5:43:00 AM PDT by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Perhaps when we’re officially criminalized - we can really become criminals.


10 posted on 06/21/2009 5:53:25 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

absentee ballots are a permit to steal elections without monitors.


11 posted on 06/21/2009 5:55:47 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I agree, if you cannot find the time to vote then my should your vote be counted at all.

The Only people that should be allowed to Vote Absentee are serving in our military and we all know what the Liberals have always tried to do with their ballots....


12 posted on 06/21/2009 6:06:06 AM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Good essay, but it missed Bonnie Erbe’s call to start rounding up right wing haters BEFORE they commit more hate crimes.

Dept of pre-crime, here we come.


13 posted on 06/21/2009 6:12:05 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

14 posted on 06/21/2009 6:15:56 AM PDT by shooter223 (the government should fear the citizens......not the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
According to the organized left and government officials, anyone who criticizes policies emanating from Washington is an “extremist” and is worthy of a watchful eye from law enforcement at best and of being considered a terrorism danger at worst.

If I wasn't on the list before, I certainly will be after this:

My Fourth of July Tea Party Speech

15 posted on 06/21/2009 6:45:28 AM PDT by Noumenon (As long as I have a rifle, I STILL have a vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

You sure will be you will be joining me in the government re-education camps my son said they will be sending me too. FR will get a request for all your personal information.


16 posted on 06/21/2009 6:47:15 AM PDT by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

To the Mighty Media Monolith - if you own a gun, you are already halfway there.


17 posted on 06/21/2009 6:49:22 AM PDT by 2harddrive (then)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Achilles Heel

islamist is as islamist does


18 posted on 06/21/2009 7:20:07 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Have they said that we’re ‘confused and disoriented’ yet?


19 posted on 06/21/2009 7:24:51 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

After the fact bump.....


20 posted on 06/21/2009 2:05:22 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson