Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A shift in Iran would not change nuclear policy
LATimes ^ | June 20, 2009 | Jeffrey Fleishman

Posted on 06/22/2009 10:54:29 PM PDT by CutePuppy

The widespread protests in Iran, even in the improbable event they deliver presidential challenger Mir-Hossein Mousavi to power, are unlikely to dramatically change the country's nuclear ambitions or the strategic complications the West faces in countering Tehran's political gambits across the Middle East.

Iran's nuclear program, which Washington alleges is intended to produce atomic weapons, is ingrained in the national psyche. It was begun decades ago and is embraced across the Iranian political spectrum. Its future rests more on the wishes of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the ruling clerics than it does with hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or the more moderate Mousavi.

The nuclear endeavor, along with geography, vast oil supplies and resistance to Western pressure, are crucial to Iran's stature in the region. The political tumult and bloodshed over the June 12 elections may force a shift in domestic policies, but not a scientific mission that predates the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

"The elections are a crisis from within the system itself," said Hassan Nafaa, a political scientist at Cairo University. "It might change internal issues, but the nuclear agenda will not be modified. Iranians are united around this.

.....

The battle between Ahmadinejad, who was declared winner of last week's election, and Mousavi, who is claiming fraud, illustrates the schism Iran faces in engaging the West: Ahmadinejad's harsh screeds or Mousavi's more conciliatory tone. Mousavi, who has a long history of support for atomic energy, is perceived as more amenable to defusing international tensions that could lead to Iran working with the United States in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon.

The Obama administration, which has sought a diplomatic opening with Tehran, has voiced support for the protesters while trying to avoid statements that would make it more difficult to work with Iran's leadership.

.....

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ahmadinejad; iran; iraniannukes; mousavi; mullahs; nuclear
Change you can believe in? So that, in the end, all they and we would get would be a different, more "moderate" face of Iran, to help Obama concede nukes to "moderate Iran" without looking like a total loser.

That and general unhappiness about economy in Iran (like everywhere else) is all this is about?

1 posted on 06/22/2009 10:54:29 PM PDT by CutePuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Obama is Ahmadinejad’s coward. We have a President who refuses to stand against murderous thugs that shoot down people in the street.


2 posted on 06/22/2009 10:59:46 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

The people in the streets are wearing jeans and surfer t shirts carrying signs written not in Farsi, Russian, French, Chinese or Spanish but in English.

I’d rather they be in control of a nation wirh Nukes than the rag heads.

Turkey is a great example of a Islamic nation that works.

The reason the LA Times wrote this is because liberals would like to see Islam rule nations.


3 posted on 06/22/2009 11:11:25 PM PDT by NoLibZone (I swear by my life & my love of it, that I will never buy U.S.made goods again!- In Galts Vallley!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

I agree


4 posted on 06/22/2009 11:18:30 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld (A leader does not deserve the name unless he is willing occasionally to stand alone-Henry Kissenger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
The people in the streets are wearing jeans and surfer t shirts carrying signs written not in Farsi, Russian, French, Chinese or Spanish but in English.

So did Obama voters in Novemeber and illegals in USA on May Day parades.

I’d rather they be in control of a nation wirh Nukes than the rag heads.

Why would they be "in control" if (which I don't expect) the mullahs somehow decide to declare Mousavi a winner? I am not sure you have read the entire article.


5 posted on 06/22/2009 11:26:36 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
Well, I'd say who's hands any Iranian nukes are in is something of a subject of concern, and we can't get much worse than Imanutjob.

As well, the "national psyche" is something only liberals can judge with any accuracy, and we are wholly dependent upon them for this information. The rest of us have to judge things by apparent facts, such as whether the president of the country screams "death to Israel, death to the US" every day. You know, those little bits of information we glean on our own, since we are so cut off from the yutes.

6 posted on 06/22/2009 11:27:50 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Considering that the protests have moved beyond challenging Immanutjob to crossing the red line of challenging the Ayatollahs themselves and the legitimacy of their rule I’d say the LA Times is reporting about 1 week to 10 days behind the times.

Which of course is pretty good for a MSM dinosaur. Hell, they still think they’re relevant in this story.


7 posted on 06/22/2009 11:33:21 PM PDT by PittsburghAfterDark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

I’m not so sure. I think the Iranian people are fed up. They don’t buy the theory that the west is out to get them.


8 posted on 06/23/2009 12:15:40 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Good Point


9 posted on 06/23/2009 12:30:26 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld (A leader does not deserve the name unless he is willing occasionally to stand alone-Henry Kissenger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

The LA Times just admitted Iran has its fingers in all pies with their “Mousavi is the butcher of Beirut” story.

If the issue is Isreal’s ability to keep Iran balled a threat, they can do so just as easliy with the “Butcher of Beirut” as they can with Mullahs supported Machmood.


10 posted on 06/23/2009 1:45:04 AM PDT by NoLibZone (I swear by my life & my love of it, that I will never buy U.S.made goods again!- In Galts Vallley!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

The LA Times just admitted Iran has it’s fingers in all pies with their “Mousavi is the butcher of Beirut” story!

If the issue is Israel’s ability to keep Iran labeled a threat, they can do so just as easily with the “Butcher of Beirut” as they can with Mullahs supported Machmood.

But I love the left admitting Iran is involved in Beirut.


11 posted on 06/23/2009 1:48:57 AM PDT by NoLibZone (I swear by my life & my love of it, that I will never buy U.S.made goods again!- In Galts Vallley!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Shall the current George Bush in the white house spend blood and treasure, (assuming he had any left) to effect “regime change”? Do we really have a dog in this fight? Will the new Mullahs recognize Israel and bring on the millennium, beat the nuclear swords into plowshares, or will they continue to develop the Bomb?
BTW Turkey doesn't have a Mullah controlled Government.
barbra ann
12 posted on 06/23/2009 4:50:22 AM PDT by barb-tex (Barracuda Sarah has a compelling life story too, but with NO affirmative Action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: barb-tex

No Blood and treasure.

And as we see with Ron Paul , not even non binding emotional support to those that fight tyranny.

The US is no longer the leader or even a proponent of a free world.


13 posted on 06/23/2009 9:05:30 AM PDT by NoLibZone (I swear by my life & my love of it, that I will never buy U.S.made goods again!- In Galts Vallley!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

0bama’s apologists are going to make him come out of this looking good if it kills them. “Riots? What riots? It was all a handful of rich Iranian kids having a tantrum. Believe us, not your own lying eyes.”


14 posted on 06/23/2009 9:11:55 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
0bama’s apologists are going to make him come out of this looking good if it kills them.

I would not shed a tear if it kills them. The problem is that their words and actions (or inaction) usually lead to death or impoverishment of other people... for naught and often en masse.

15 posted on 06/23/2009 11:42:04 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson