Posted on 06/23/2009 9:53:41 AM PDT by jessduntno
So much for tolerance and living with people who are different from you, eh hypocrite liberal school district?
Ditto goes for you, read post #2
Covered from post #2 on...try to keep up...
FR rule #1 should be: Read all posts before posting.
“FR rule #1 should be: Read all posts before posting.”
It is a little bit like cutting someone off in mid sentence and being rude...”try to keep up” sounds like the good folks on the school committee we were talking about...why the snarkiness when there is some sort of explanation (and I even apologized for not being able to fit it in) among supposed comrades? I duntno...I jess duntno...
"Try to keep up" is a snarky comeback that is just not needed.
Conservatives need to be listed as one of the groups protected by hate crime laws.
I have made the mistake of posting before reading all the posts.
"Try to keep up" is a snarky comeback that is just not needed.
True. But considering that Hacklehead's #20 used precisely that comeback to jessduntno's #1, I would hope that Hacklehead recognizes how ill-situated he is to take offense.
Although I read your subsequent post, I still question the logic of this statement.
"Reason", properly applied based on the history of the government education system of the past three decades, makes it a virtual certainty of the circumstances surrounding this man's dismissal.
In fact, IMHO, even your "first instinct" should have been to "reason" that it was almost certainly true.
This particular event is just one small example of similar happenings around the country in government education systems that happen every day.
>>>I wonder if the teacher got stuck with a big bill for having to have a lawyer.
If he is a member of a teacher’s union - they should have provided one for him... and if they did, this outcome is most excellent. :)
I take very little on faith. I'm a firm believer in "trust but verify."
Interesting point—I hadn’t thought of that.
“True. But considering that Hacklehead’s #20 used precisely that comeback to jessduntno’s #1, I would hope that Hacklehead recognizes how ill-situated he is to take offense.”
Wow, so many responses about my “snarky” comment. First of all, it was pretty low on the snarkyness scale for FR, commonplace actually. Second, I didnt and wouldnt have taken offense when it was directed back at me. I will say however that in the many years I have been here (many more than indicated by my most recent screen name) I have never seen someone post an outdated message then follow it up 2 messages later with post that makes post #1 essentially obsolete. Why post the original if you are going to post he got his contract renewed 2 posts later? Add to that all the responses seemed to be unaware of the new developments. So excuse me if I missed post 3. As far as reading all posts before posting, its a best practice but not a realistic expectation. Like trying to get everyone to read the article before posting, good luck with that.
Sorry for the double post, but I inadvertantly left you off the response.
“True. But considering that Hacklehead’s #20 used precisely that comeback to jessduntno’s #1, I would hope that Hacklehead recognizes how ill-situated he is to take offense.”
Wow, so many responses about my “snarky” comment. First of all, it was pretty low on the snarkyness scale for FR, commonplace actually. Second, I didnt and wouldnt have taken offense when it was directed back at me. I will say however that in the many years I have been here (many more than indicated by my most recent screen name) I have never seen someone post an outdated message then follow it up 2 messages later with post that makes post #1 essentially obsolete. Why post the original if you are going to post he got his contract renewed 2 posts later? Add to that all the responses seemed to be unaware of the new developments. So excuse me if I missed post 3. As far as reading all posts before posting, its a best practice but not a realistic expectation. Like trying to get everyone to read the article before posting, good luck with that.
“I have never seen someone post an outdated message then follow it up 2 messages later with post that makes post #1 essentially obsolete.”
You still haven’t seen that - I posted them consecutively - I have no idea what the #1 and #3 nonsense you are writing is about - and they did not make anything obsolete, they were a continuation of the story. I don’t know what you are talking about here, but if you don’t think an apology is in order, I really don’t care. You got this one wrong again; let it go.
it was pretty low on the snarkyness scale for FR, commonplace actually. Second, I didnt and wouldnt have taken offense when it was directed back at me.“True. [that "Try to keep up" is a snarky comeback that is not needed].But considering that Hacklehead’s #20 used precisely that comeback to jessduntno’s #1, I would hope that Hacklehead recognizes how ill-situated he is to take offense.”
. . . so there's no problem or disagreement on that point.I will say however that in the many years I have been here (many more than indicated by my most recent screen name) I have never seen someone post an outdated message then follow it up 2 messages later with post that makes post #1 essentially obsolete. Why post the original if you are going to post he got his contract renewed 2 posts later? Add to that all the responses seemed to be unaware of the new developments. So excuse me if I missed post 3.
I have to admit that you certainly have a point there. It was confusing. And required a closer reading than you can expect FReepers to always give, as you note.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.