Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"I realize that the issue of reproductive choice is divisive and that there are many heartfelt feelings on both sides of the aisle," said Shaheen in a press release.

Infanticide IS NOT "reproductive choice"!

1 posted on 06/23/2009 12:47:50 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 06/23/2009 12:48:53 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 06/23/2009 12:49:34 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)

Be interesting to see what happens when this unholy trio makes their case before the Almighty about this attempted 'resolution.'

Guess they never heard of the Commandment, "Thou Shalt Not Shed Innocent Blood"

4 posted on 06/23/2009 12:50:08 PM PDT by pray4liberty (http://www.foundersvalues.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Yay we beat it. Boo that the American people won’t get to see what these people really believe.


5 posted on 06/23/2009 12:51:42 PM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
However, I was hopeful that, regardless of our differences of opinion on this sensitive issue, the Senate could come together and pass a resolution that rejects the use of violence against women's health care providers.

How about rejecting the use of violence against unborn children?

::::crickets::::

6 posted on 06/23/2009 12:53:11 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Maybe they should look at ultra sounds and then say how could anyone kill that baby inside that woman.

Only a murderer could is the answer.

Case in point.
A man kills a pregnant woman and around this country he has been charged for the murder of the woman and the baby so why is it not the same for a so called Doc who puts the Gov of KS on his donation list not charged with a murder too?


7 posted on 06/23/2009 12:53:47 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

You understand Shaheen. Your idea was almost born but it had a partial birth abortion. It’s legal you know.


8 posted on 06/23/2009 12:56:28 PM PDT by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
The resolution, sponsored by Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), decried violence against "providers of health care services to women" and asserted, "there is a history of violence against providers of reproductive health care, as health care employees have suffered threats and hostility in order to provide crucial services to patients."

The resolution failed to gather adequate support after Shaheen refused requests by some of her colleagues to strike the language celebrating the abortion industry. Shaheen expressed frustration at the resolution's demise.

Thankfully, there are saner minds in the Senate - at least by comparison.

9 posted on 06/23/2009 12:56:57 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (Theology is the Queen Of The Sciences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
"It is a sad day when the elected leaders of the greatest Democracy on earth can't agree to protect those exercising their constitutional rights."

Like the right to keep and bear arms, Senator Sheehan?

10 posted on 06/23/2009 12:57:10 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
These people are reprehensible.

They are “(un)righteously indignant” when a terrorist is sleep deprived, and yet celebrate the dismemberment of an infant.

11 posted on 06/23/2009 12:59:37 PM PDT by Never on my watch (The scientist who would have discovered the cure to AIDS in the Amazon was aborted in January 1978)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

How about Celebrating the Constitutional Rights of the Unborn Babies, little defenseless Human Beings! How does the Idiot BOXER defend Tiller the Baby Killer and support Petterson’s coviction of a Double Murder!!! Schucks, the baby boy was just a blob of protoplasm worth nothing, worth less than Obama’s brutally killed FLY!/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s!!!!
Miss Boxer, you are not worthy of any title including the one used in this sentence:-)


12 posted on 06/23/2009 12:59:54 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (GOD BLESS AMERICA and Our Last Great President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

What about the violence to the unborn? They’re human, too.


13 posted on 06/23/2009 1:06:10 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

First of all I would not call abortion “women’s healthcare” as there is nothing “healthy” about a practise where the patient(baby) always dies as in an abortion.


14 posted on 06/23/2009 1:08:09 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
How does killing little baby women help women???
15 posted on 06/23/2009 1:14:21 PM PDT by Niteranger68 (Have you punished an 0bama supporter today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

You mean republicans didn’t just bend over and take it as usual??


16 posted on 06/23/2009 1:18:40 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Why am I not surprised to see “Ma’am” Boxer’s name on this idiotic bill?


17 posted on 06/23/2009 1:24:03 PM PDT by MWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

The One’s teflon may be weakening.


18 posted on 06/23/2009 1:24:53 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

What about the violence done to the babies they murder?


19 posted on 06/23/2009 1:29:49 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (When do the impeachment proceedings begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

It’s “women’s healthcare”, according to someone in the article.


20 posted on 06/23/2009 1:31:07 PM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
"there is a history of violence against providers of reproductive health care, as health care employees have suffered threats and hostility in order to provide crucial services to patients."

Never has murder been described so euphemistically. Someone earns a bloody little badge; please step forward.

21 posted on 06/23/2009 1:32:38 PM PDT by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson