Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Read e-mails between Sanford, woman
The State ^ | 6/25/2009

Posted on 06/25/2009 12:18:52 AM PDT by bruinbirdman

Edited on 06/25/2009 12:26:21 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: mikeus_maximus

Sanford went to BA and broke it off with the Hot Tamale who (by all accounts) has only been divorced a couple of years and who already has had another affair with a younger man.

He has apologized to his wife and to his constituents. He is undergoing counseling (I hope it is couples’ counseling with a wise counselor).

Unless there has been an embezzlement, the selling of State Secrets, or a murder involved in this story, we should all step back and allow this family to heal for the sake of their 4 boys, or those boys will repeat this pattern as sure as the day is long.

Mrs. Sanford seems amenable to putting the pieces back together, so give them a chance with assassinating anybody’s character.

The first thing Mrs. Sanford should do is to get herself checked by a gynacologist to make sure that Mr. Sanford did not bring home any “gifts” from his (and the paramour’s) wanderings. Mr. Sanford needs to see his own doctor.


41 posted on 06/25/2009 10:10:25 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

That should have said “withOUT assassinating anybody’s character”.


42 posted on 06/25/2009 10:11:38 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Mrs. Sanford seems amenable to putting the pieces back together, so give them a chance with assassinating anybody’s character.

Fair comment. If they both face this honestly, perhaps they can.

43 posted on 06/25/2009 10:22:27 AM PDT by mikeus_maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mikeus_maximus

We celebrated our 50th Anniversary on the 7th of February this year. (More accurately, we are going to celebrate it on the 4th of July because nobody wants to come to WI in Feb.) I still remember the words of the Priest who married us because they caused a bit of a stir at the Reception.

“Each of you will remember to expect to give 90% to the marriage and expect to get back 10%.”

I thought that was good advice, and I’ve tried to follow it — sometimes more successfully than others. And so has my husband. You must read those words carefully and not get distracted by the old 50/50 fairness doctrine we are taught from childhood.

THere was a little bit of flak thrown at the wedding luncheon from a guest who thought that the 90/10 formula was some kind of evil, Catholic plot to take advantage of the woman. LOL.


44 posted on 06/25/2009 10:48:23 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mikeus_maximus

I’ve been married twice. Once to a cheater and now to a non-cheater.

The difference in their internal character is like night and day. And I can safely and honestly say that their characters are not, were not a result of my wifely efforts.

I was a far better wife to the cheater in the traditional sense of subservience and devotion to his every expressed want and need because I believed that I could somehow earn his love and devotion if I just tried harder.

Now I’m married to a man who pursues me and loves me even when I’m totally undeserving, most especially when I am my own most undeserving and he doesn’t do it because I respect him (although I do and I know he cherishes that respect), he does it because of his own internal controls and choices.

Character is who you are when you think no one else is watching. Some people choose to have it and others don’t.


45 posted on 06/25/2009 11:05:53 AM PDT by Valpal1 (Always be prepared to make that difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Agreed. And huge congratulations!


46 posted on 06/25/2009 11:05:53 AM PDT by mikeus_maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Then I’m sorry for your pain, or if I’ve contributed to it in any way, and I wish you the best.


47 posted on 06/25/2009 11:14:03 AM PDT by mikeus_maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mikeus_maximus
No, he’s not excused, but the obvious point is that the wife is not some special, blameless deity. These kinds of things can often be avoided with less selfishness on BOTH sides.

All the selflessness in the world on the part of one partner will not cure the lack of character in the other.

Nobody is holding Mrs. Sanford up as a blameless deity, they are seeing her as pitiable. They recognize the deep wounding this publicity has caused. How do you think it feels for her to read the emails written to Maria that should have been writter to her, the mother of his sons? To have that carp being published in every tabloid in the universe.

48 posted on 06/25/2009 11:24:28 AM PDT by Valpal1 (Always be prepared to make that difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed
"Nice way to justify spreading gossip and sticking your nose in someone else’s business."

The real story about the e-mails is this:

The governor goes AWOL. A democrat in the capital goes into his computer files, copies the personal e-mail and gives it to McClatchy press.

Following the news is exactly why FR exists.

yitbos

49 posted on 06/25/2009 11:51:30 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

The real story about the emails is that they were sent to the press just about the same time as Mrs. Sanford was informed, or discovered, the affair. They had to have been sent by someone who knew how to access the Governor’s personal email. That could have been an aide. That could have been Mrs. Sanford. That could have been the Argentinian hot tamale. That could have been the AHT’s (Argentinian Hot Tamale) other lover, or ex-husband.


50 posted on 06/25/2009 1:00:40 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Actually if you read the accounts of people at the hotel they were meeting at, he did NOT break it off.

They said the couple had their hands all over each other and couldn’t stop hugging and kissing each other.

Doesn’t sound to me like he broke it off...

Ed


51 posted on 06/25/2009 1:53:25 PM PDT by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson