Skip to comments.Lombard Demonstrates Why Gays Should Not be Allowed to Adopt
Posted on 06/29/2009 7:06:39 AM PDT by big black dog
The on-line rape of his 5-year-old adopted son by Duke University's openly-gay, Frank Lombard, is no anomaly. Instead, Lombard's molestation fits the pattern that emerged in the latest review of the scientific literature about gay fathers.
Lombard lives with his gay partner, another Duke University employee. The Arrest Warrant documents that Lombard sodomized one of his two adopted African-American sons and made the boy give him oral sex on-line. He offered other gays the same opportunity. Although the boy was drugged, "it is likely he developed interest in gay sex through these activities," said Dr. Paul Cameron, an expert in gay fostering/gay adoption and author of the latest review.
Published in the peer-reviewed Psychological Reports, the review(1) noted that gays' children were more frequently exposed to parental molestation and more apt to adopt homosexual interests and activities. "The Lombard case fits the pattern," said Dr. Cameron. "While every gay parent does not molest his child, the scientific literature records a much higher incidence of molestation by gay parents or foster parents."
Dr. Cameron, Chairman of the Family Research Institute, a Colorado Springs think-tank, noted that the review documented that gays' children were also:
1) more apt to report sexual confusion;
2) more apt to be socially disturbed;
3) more apt to abuse substances;
4) less apt to get married;
5) more apt to have difficulty in attachment and loving relationships; and
6) more apt to have emotional difficulties.
"The cant that 'gay parents are no more likely to molest' is not based on evidence but liberal ideology," said Cameron. "By endorsing gay adoption, President Obama, the state of North Carolina, and Duke University share blame for this tragedy. These policy makers let dogma blind them to evidence that has been in the literature for years. Why would anyone who cared about children endorse adoption by members of a group which had 23% of its members admit to sex with boys(2) or had 19% say they felt 'positive' about sex with them?
How dare you jest !!!
I was a little confused by that too. Then I thought about it and realized it must mean it was done on webcam and people could watch it online.
I’ve been a counselor for 20 years and what you say is true. I have verified this countless times. When children grow and engage in homosexuality, there is always a childhood reason found. This is not a genitic disorder and it’s not normal.
Very true. I’ve been a counselor for 20 years and have seen this.
I wonder if he’s one of the 88 professors that signed the letter condemning the LAX players. I need to dig up that list.
Easy, they don't care one bit about children. Obama doesn't seem to care about children in the least. He has done all he can to promote abortion, even infanticide. He has eliminated the D.C. school choice voucher program. The program was wildly successful and popular with everyone except the NEA. He like all liberals are adamant about returning children to known drug abusers and criminals, simply because they have abiological connection to the child.
They hate children.
I assume this means he had the kid perform oral sex on him while being filmed by a webcam, and the video broadcast out to some gay-sex website.
In a just society, this type of crime would be punished by:
(In this order):
1) Having the Gospel shared with him.
2) Being given 24 hours to repent and get right with Jesus.
3) Being publicly executed, once his eternal destiny is between him and God.
Are you purposefully this dumb? A serious study, child sexual abuse shown on the net, and you crack semi-wise?
And public hanging cannot be reinstituted?
Should start with this “man.”
that's why I believe that if you give gays the choice of either A) legalized gay marriage or B) legalization of sex with under-aged boys - the majority would pick B. Gay marriage is a sham.
This piece of crap should be castrated and put in with the general prison population.
What are you doing reading gay travel guides?
**but gay men molest boys at a rate 44 times that of the rest of the adult male population molests girls.**
That’s quite a damning stat, do you have a source for this?
Not true, you have to understand homosexuals are about 1-2% of the population. Heterosexuals are 98-99% of the population.
So, you may have more incidence of abuse by heterosexuals, however as a percentage of the heterosexual population fewer people are pedophiles. 1% of 99% is a much higher number than 1% of 1-2%. The reality is when you adjust for their representative percentages in the population, homosexual men are 44 more times likely to be a pedophile than heterosexual men.
It simliar to the welfare, more whites are on welfare than blacks, however as a percentage of their populations blacks are far more likely to be on welfare.
I am still trying to track down the original study I got that from, it was an analysis of FBI crime statistics. Taking the number of convicted homosexual pedophiles divided by the number of homosexuals in the general population vs heterosexual pedophiles over the number of heterosexuals in the general population.
The result was homosexuals were 44 times more likely than heterosexuals to be a pedophile.
Those that think homosexuality is not a mental illness, I ask you to simply do this, go find a gay travel guide and a normal travel guide for a destination. To this for maybe 10 destinations and then look and see how many of the gay travel guides point out where you can find underage boys for sex, and how many of the normal travel guides mention where you can find underage kids for sex.
These people have a mental illness folks, it has varying degrees, but its a mental illness none the less.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.