Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nazi Stealth Jet Could Have Won War for Hitler
FoxNews.com ^ | 7/1/2009

Posted on 07/01/2009 4:36:17 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies

Meet the "wonder weapon" that could have won the war for Hitler.

Called the Horten 229, the radical "flying wing" fighter-bomber looked and acted a lot like the U.S. Air Force's current B-2 — right down to the "stealth" radar-evading characteristics.

Fortunately for the world, the Ho 229 wasn't put into mass production before Nazi Germany surrendered in May 1945.

But American researchers boxed up and shipped home the prototypes and partially-built planes that existed — and now the same company that builds the B-2 has rebuilt one.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Germany; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; ho229; nazi; stealth; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2009 4:36:17 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

2 posted on 07/01/2009 4:38:02 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (Obama: "Enough about me, let's talk about you...what do you think of me?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
People don't realize how close the world came to having German as its official language...

3 posted on 07/01/2009 4:38:59 AM PDT by MikeWUSAF (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
Nazi Stealth Jet Could Have Won War for Hitler

No it couldn't have. Made it costlier for the Allies, maybe. Prolong the war a little bit, maybe. But it alone wasn't going to stop the several million troops converging on Berlin from both sides.

4 posted on 07/01/2009 4:39:13 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
I watched the National Geographic show about the Ho-229 Sunday night, and it was quite impressive.

PHOTOS: "Hitler's Stealth Fighter"


5 posted on 07/01/2009 4:39:42 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

I would like to see a compilation in one place of all the innovations that Nazi Germany came up with - the list must be staggering. Jets, Stealth, rocketry, this B2 like plane and many, many others.


6 posted on 07/01/2009 4:41:34 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Germany should thank God they didn’t this jet into operation, assuming it is stable. Germany would have been the second country to suffer a nuclear weapon detonation had they not already been destroyed.

Only if Hitler had gotten nuclear weapons could he have “won”.


7 posted on 07/01/2009 4:51:47 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

There was a book that came out about ten years back titled: “How Hitler could have won”. It details a number of fatal Nazi mistakes & missed opportunities. In short:
— No declaration of war on America
— No invasion of Russia
— Expand operations in the Middle East. Seize the Arab oil fields.

I find this argument very compelling. If Hitler could have maintained his pact with the Soviet Union while gaining control of the Saudi oil fields, he might have won. Also, its not clear if America would have entered the war against Nazi Germany had Hitler not declared war on the US first. Short of these major strategic revisions, I really doubt there was any conventional weapon or technology that would have won the war for Hitler.


8 posted on 07/01/2009 4:52:48 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: SonOfDarkSkies

I recall seeing a much smaller version of a German flying wing at the Smithsonian’s “Silver Hill” facility. I’m not sure if that ever saw service, but it looked like a mean little machine.


10 posted on 07/01/2009 4:59:16 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (Achtung. preparen zie fur die obamahopenchangen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Not likely. They would have had the same problems we had with the flying wing till computer technology caught up.


11 posted on 07/01/2009 5:02:06 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
The Allies didn't spend as much time on these type wonder weapons because we knew they would be too late to make a difference.

Hitler was insane, no if, ands or buts. His own people knew it.

12 posted on 07/01/2009 5:03:00 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
Northrop experimented with flying wing designs extensively in the late 40s early 50s. Without computer control, Hitler's version would have the same problems that killed the early Northrop flying wings.
13 posted on 07/01/2009 5:03:55 AM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Like most of the German late war fighters, great planes but not enough pilots or fuel. Our production over whelmed the Germans and we had an endless supply of pilot trainees, new jet prototypes, and lots of fuel. The only thing that might have saved them was their own A Bomb. By late 1944 the quality of their troops was dismal. The Army was spent and could not effectively sustain a counter attack. Whether a stealth airplane or the Trans Atlantic Bomber could do any damage by the time we hit the beaches of Normandy is doubtful. A former WW II German Officer once told me, “When the Americans landed in France, we knew the war was over.” (That from a former Capt. in the Waffen SS.)


14 posted on 07/01/2009 5:04:31 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Democrats have nothing to fear but Palin being herself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

This National Socialist stealth bomber would not have won the war for Hitler. In fact, it likely would have had no influence whatsoever. The problem is that it was not capable of carrying enough bombs to seriously damage the Allied war effort.

Unlike the Americans and British, National Socialist Germany never developed a heavy bomber like the B-17. The Luftwaffe was very good at tactical air support, but not strategic bombing, which required a large number of planes capable of carrying many bombs to rain on targets below. The Americans and British used long range bombers to wipe out Germany’s ability to wage war long before ground troops got anywhere near the Rhine. The results paid huge dividends for the Russians pn the Eastern front.


15 posted on 07/01/2009 5:08:00 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Edwards Air Force base is named after Glen Edwards who died while test flying a flying wing.


16 posted on 07/01/2009 5:09:01 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

The only way Germany could have avoided defeat would have been to get rid of Hitler and Himmler, etc. The ME262 was an example of an advanced weapon that was squandered by the idiot Hitler in pointless uses. Same thing would have occurred with this plane.

Since the strategic bombing offensive had little to do with Germany’s defeat in the first place a stealthy interceptor would have encouraged the Allies to stop wasting lives and resources in minimally effective bombing raids.


17 posted on 07/01/2009 5:09:24 AM PDT by Seruzawa (Obamalama lied, the republic died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

I saw this jet on one of those wonder weapons of WWII that the History Channel did. It had the range to fly round trip to the US East Coast carrying a nuclear device.


18 posted on 07/01/2009 5:10:27 AM PDT by saganite (What would Sully do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobjam

Don’t forget we had the Nordon bomb sight.


19 posted on 07/01/2009 5:13:06 AM PDT by VTenigma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
"Could have won the war"?

Big talk about a plane that never flew (and still hasn't).

Hitler made the same mistake (pinning his hopes on wonder weapons that weren't ready, wouldn't work or were too complicated to produce and operate).

20 posted on 07/01/2009 5:16:01 AM PDT by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Agreed. Typical sensationalist headline and article.

Germany had young kids flying their planes at the end because their good pilots were dead. Also, Hitler’s constant interference (like Obama’s) caused total inefficiencies in production of other jet aircraft THAT COULD HAVE SLOWED THE EFFORT BY ALLIES.

The Germans were doomed (thank god) by Hitler’s insanity on the eastern front. Once Russia got motivated and turned back Germany from Moscow, the game was over in the long run.


21 posted on 07/01/2009 5:16:44 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
I would like to see a compilation in one place of all the innovations that Nazi Germany came up with

www.luft46.com
22 posted on 07/01/2009 5:17:00 AM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

IIRC, that book postulated that the truly fatal error was the German invasion of Crete. This operation accomplished little strategically but shattered the German airborne capacity. If the Germans had instead focused on Malta they could have won the war in the Med and North Africa and forced Britain to make peace. I found this an interesting thesis.


23 posted on 07/01/2009 5:20:55 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("My 80% friend is not my 20% enemy" - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Seem Germany would of had a commanding role in the developement of stealth technology since they invented radar.

http://www.ask.com/bar?q=when+was+radar+developed&page=1&qsrc=0&ab=0&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.radarworld.org%2Fgermany.html


24 posted on 07/01/2009 5:23:03 AM PDT by wolfcreek (KMTEXASA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

and if Spartacus had a Piper Cub, he would’ve defeated the Romans.


25 posted on 07/01/2009 5:24:42 AM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER

“Hitler made the same mistake (pinning his hopes on wonder weapons that weren’t ready, wouldn’t work or were too complicated to produce and operate).”

Sounds like the Obama energy plan, only more fiscally responsible.


26 posted on 07/01/2009 5:25:23 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Oratam

If we had nukes in WWI, there wouldn’t have been a WWII. It really would have been the war to end all wars.


27 posted on 07/01/2009 5:26:05 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

We had a thread on this last week. Some good conversation on an interesting subject.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2280959/posts


28 posted on 07/01/2009 5:27:34 AM PDT by Loud Mime (It all makes sense when you understand that Obama is a Muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

The Horten [and they were working on a bomber version], the jet fighter, the jet bomber, the cruise missle [V-1], the ballistic missile [V-2], the first wire-guided missile, the assault rifle [sturmgewehr 44], the rapid fire light machinegun w/ quick change barrel [MG 42], the first double action semi-automatic service pistol [Walther P 38], the first rifle w/ infra red sight [Vampyr], advanced radio/intercom in tanks, the ‘four finger’ formation for aircraft still used today [Kondor Legion, Spain], the forerunner to the RPG [panzerfaust], offensive infantry tactics based around the machine gun, the tank/ armored warfare doctrine still used today, the balanced [all arms] armored division, the shaped charge, modern airborne tactics.


29 posted on 07/01/2009 5:35:59 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

I think you saw the Me-163 rocket plane used at the end of the war or the much smaller Northrop version in bright yellow, which actually dates back to the Thirties.


30 posted on 07/01/2009 5:42:56 AM PDT by 12Gauge687 (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Looks a little like the crafts in the Kenneth Arnold sightings.


31 posted on 07/01/2009 5:46:20 AM PDT by quesera (We are so screwed!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

I didn’t see it, but did the show mention that Jack Northrup had prop flying wings in the air and turbo jet versions on the drawing board awaiting Nene engines from Britain?


32 posted on 07/01/2009 5:48:02 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF
Made it costlier for the Allies, maybe.

It would not even have done that. Radar was rudimentary so 'stealth' was not a real factor in the game. Unless the plane was actually a whole squadron and it carried nukes. then it would have made next to no impact on the war. Besides, the Nazis lacked the computers needed to make such a plane reliably flyable.
33 posted on 07/01/2009 5:48:22 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saganite

You’re thinking of the larger version, which was nicknamed an ‘America bomber.’ The Ho 2-29 depicted in this thread was planned to be a fighter-bomber.


34 posted on 07/01/2009 5:48:26 AM PDT by 12Gauge687 (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
I get tickled at the one dimensional conclusions that are reached when discussing the early jet aircraft. The fact is that it was if anything a waste of resources at the time. If there is on thing that we can be grateful for in history is the fact that Germany spent most of the war using mid-1930s designed aircraft. The problem with all of the jet aircraft at the time was engine reliability and thrust. German jet engine reliability was such that average engine life between failure was about 12 hours. This reliability was one reason that the ME-262 only fought in an area near their home field and did not loiter or activly hunt.
THe early jet engines were also gas hogs which meant that in order to have range you sacrificed payload.
Thank goodness the technology was still several years in the future.
35 posted on 07/01/2009 5:49:07 AM PDT by Wooly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DB

I think we would have nuked them 1st. Liberating Europe was the priority.


36 posted on 07/01/2009 5:49:49 AM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new enviromentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wooly

Thank Goodness, Indeed.


37 posted on 07/01/2009 5:54:13 AM PDT by wolfcreek (KMTEXASA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 12Gauge687

Thanks for the correction. Germany had quite a few advanced aircraft on the drawing boards or in testing. Hard to keep up with all of them.


38 posted on 07/01/2009 5:58:52 AM PDT by saganite (What would Sully do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

The problem with those scenarios is that in the 1939-45 time range the world had no idea of the amount of oil available in Saudi Arabia and there were no Arab oil fields to seize. The largest and most available known oil reserves to Germany were in Romania and the Soviet Union; the first commercial oil field in Saudi Arabia wasn’t developed by SoCal until 1938 or 39. I don’t see Hitler going after that area on a could be/might be chance that the oil he wanted was there. He would have gone after the sure thing.


39 posted on 07/01/2009 6:00:40 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Baloney!
The Manhattan project guaranteed US victory.
The Germans were FAR behind in nuclear weaponry.

A Germany with all its major cities utterly destroyed would have been the eventual result. It matters little what sort of planes Germany might have developed.


40 posted on 07/01/2009 6:03:03 AM PDT by Bobalu (If life was fair it would be the horse's turn to ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407
"I recall seeing a much smaller version of a German flying wing at the Smithsonian’s “Silver Hill” facility. I’m not sure if that ever saw service, but it looked like a mean little machine."

I believe that was the Messerschmidt ME 163 Komet rocket fighter. It was a short flight duration, bomber interceptor that was deployed during the latter stages of the war. The fuel on board made it a death trap and several pilots were virtually melted by fuel spills in crashes. It did shoot down some Allied bombers, though.

41 posted on 07/01/2009 6:07:36 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Sarah Palin...Unleashing the Fury of the Castrated Left!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Bingo. Nukes trump Jets.


42 posted on 07/01/2009 6:10:49 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: saganite
It had the range to fly round trip to the US East Coast carrying a nuclear device.

Sounds like the Sanger Silver Bird suborbital bomber design.


43 posted on 07/01/2009 6:15:58 AM PDT by 6SJ7 (atlasShruggedInd: ON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Yeah, its been a while since I read (skimmed really) the book. As I recall, the author did talk about the Germans seizing the Caucuses from below. That might have been more defensible, but still would have triggered war with the USSR. Even if Hitler only had the Romanian oil, his biggest mistake was attacking Russia. If he had kept from doing that, he would have been very hard to beat.


44 posted on 07/01/2009 6:17:54 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Darn good thing also that Superman didn't work for the Nazis.

"Uberman Takes Stalingrad in 5 Minutes"; "Uberman Rounds Up 2 Million Jews"; "Uberman Kills Every Person in England, U.S. Next"

45 posted on 07/01/2009 6:20:27 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Hitler’s biggest mistake was stabbing Stalin in the back. If he hadn’t attacked the USSR and subsequently had to spend so many resources on the eastern front he likely would have retained control of Europe.


46 posted on 07/01/2009 6:21:49 AM PDT by 6ppc (It's torch and pitchfork time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

I figure that just issuing a condemnation of the attack on Pearl Harbor could have put them a position to force a peace on the UK. The USA was really NOT interested in getting involved in WWII. Denying Roosevelt any excuse to declare war on Germany might have kept the US out of the European War. It wouldn’t have cost Hitler anything - the Japanese never did anything for him...


47 posted on 07/01/2009 6:22:02 AM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

After 1942, if they had taken out Hitler, the war would have been over almost immediately. Also, the Allied policy of Unconditional Surrender. Hitler would have been overthrown long before 1945 if that had not been there. Many Germans fought to the death rather than to be humiliated again in a Versailles type treaty.


48 posted on 07/01/2009 6:22:17 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr; BikerJoe

Very good list. What about things that are strictly speaking, outside of the military sphere. What about coal gasification? Did that originate in Germany? How about autobahns? etc. etc.?


49 posted on 07/01/2009 6:22:45 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
Yeah, its been a while since I read (skimmed really) the book. As I recall, the author did talk about the Germans seizing the Caucuses from below. That might have been more defensible, but still would have triggered war with the USSR. Even if Hitler only had the Romanian oil, his biggest mistake was attacking Russia. If he had kept from doing that, he would have been very hard to beat.

Hitler could not have been Hitler and not taken on the Soviet Union. His whole master race and living space theories and his hatred of Communism depended on it. And since there was no way he was never going to take on Stalin then I suppose one can say that he never had any real chance of winning his wars.

50 posted on 07/01/2009 6:24:14 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson