Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Obama should do what he says about secrecy (MSM awakening?)
Miami Herald ^ | 7/6/2009 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 07/06/2009 7:15:19 AM PDT by IbJensen

OUR OPINION: President Obama promised transparency but often sides with secrecy

As a candidate for president, Sen. Barack Obama vowed to run an open government. He reiterated that pledge on Inauguration Day: ''Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency,'' he said.

Nearly six months later, advocates of open government are still waiting for the president to fulfill this promise. Compared to the Bush presidency, this administration is doing better. But what President Obama has done, compared to what he said he would do, are two different things, thanks in part to the unequivocal language he used and the expections he raised.

Ended Ashcroft order

The president deserves credit for taking action on his first day in office to rescind a 2001 memo by then-Attorney General John Ashcroft giving agencies broad legal cover to reject public disclosure requests. He also revoked an executive order signed by former President George W. Bush in 2001 that limited release of former presidents' records, and replaced it with new language aimed at more transparency.

Ending unnecessary secrecy, however, has apparently proven tougher than the president expected. He has come down on the side of keeping the public uninformed in a variety of decisions that, as a candidate, he might well have scorned.

One of the most troubling instances occurred last month, involving White House refusal to turn over White House visitor logs by coal industry executives. An organization called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has filed a lawsuit, saying the Obama White House is essentially embracing the Bush administration position on the secrecy of the comings and goings of visitors to the executive mansion.

This makes for a murky transparency policy.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said lawyers were reviewing the policy regarding the release of visitor logs. They should start by reading the well-publicized ''memorandum of transparency'' that President Obama signed on his first day in office.

The president said open government was a way to hold government accountable, ``so that the American people can know exactly what decisions are being made, how they're being made, and whether their interests are being well served.''

Nice words, but if the White House doesn't stop hiding the logs, no one else in government can be expected to take the disclosure policy seriously.

The president's record of open government has fallen short of fulfillment most often on issues involving national security.

The White House agreed to release memorandums detailing the alleged torture of detainees, sparking criticism from former Bush administration officials. But in other instances the president has either embraced Mr. Bush's positions or changed his mind about following through on promises of disclosure.

At first, the White House said it would support the release of photos of detainee abuse but later reversed course and decided to leave it up to the courts. Concerns about secrecy and repercussions are valid, but passing the buck to the courts on this issue does not add to the president's credibility regarding disclosure.

The White House has also continued the Bush administration's objections to the release of an interview that former Vice President Dick Cheney gave to the FBI during its investigation of the leak of CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity. Again emulating the Bush administration, the current occupant of the White House has moved to dismiss lawsuits seeking White House e-mails from the past several years.

Using legal tactic

Mr. Obama's administration has not hesitated to fight disclosure in court, either. In May, it supported the ''state secrecy'' doctrine in a case involving a lawsuit against a government contractor by five victims of ``extraordinary rendition.''

This is the legal tactic that says the government can prevent the courts from hearing claims by those who say they were hurt by federal actions -- because the need for state secrecy requires it.

That is exactly the same position the Bush administration took, a policy that allows government to evade the accountability that Mr. Obama vowed to champion. In turning down the administration's appeal, a judge noted that the policy is often a convenient way for governments to hide politically embarrassing information.

The administration claims it has valid reasons in each of these instances to opt for secrecy, but the pattern is both disappointing and a far cry from what Mr. Obama led voters to believe during the campaign.

The government has a legitimate right to protect certain information. But the record indicates that given a choice between disclosure and secrecy, Mr. Obama is falling into the appalling habit of hiding the facts.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: bho44; obamasecrets; second100days; transparency
The sycophantic MSM still loves Obomba, but they see other newspapers fail due to one-sided coverage and want to cover their backsides.
1 posted on 07/06/2009 7:15:19 AM PDT by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
But ... he never does what he says. These people have to realize that you never pay attention to what he says. It's what he does that matters. And what he does is appalling.
2 posted on 07/06/2009 7:17:19 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I don't believe anything anyone says about anything anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Yeah, how is that “open government” plan working for the state-run commedia? They know something is is not being explained, and they perhaps miss (or totally overlook) half of what is actually happening. Have you seen any reports of the various “tea parties” around the country? Is there an UNBIASED poll about ANYTHING that is being taken or reported?

Are you feeling good yet?


3 posted on 07/06/2009 7:22:14 AM PDT by alloysteel (Never let an inanimate object know that you are in a hurry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Compared to the Bush presidency, this administration is doing better.

A perfect example of an assertion contrary to evidence.

4 posted on 07/06/2009 7:23:12 AM PDT by MortMan (Power without responsibility-the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages. - Rudyard Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Compared to the Bush presidency, this administration is doing better.

A perfect example of an assertion contrary to evidence.

An astounding misrepresentation on the part of our non-biased media. LIE, to us yokels!


5 posted on 07/06/2009 7:25:47 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“But ... he never does what he says. These people have to realize that you never pay attention to what he says. “

I was talking to a friend of mine over the weekend. Reasonably bright guy, in the trades, so he tends to side with Democrats. More often then not, he has reasons for his stands. He tends to be logical, even if at times his logic is flawed.

We started talking about Fox news. He told me how Fox was unreliable and totally hard right wing. I told him of things that were reported by Fox that never made the SRM. He grudgingly agreed, but still couldn’t come to admit that Fox is a legitimate news source. Then I pointed to Obama, his lies, and how Fox is seemingly the only news outlet keeping tabs on the lies and broken promises. Again, he grudingly agreed, but it had little impact. He still thinks Obama is ok, and might even be good. He sees nothing good in the GOP, (I’m not sure he’s too far off on that one), and still thinks Fox is the clown network.

This from a moderate Democrat. I know in the past he has voted Republican. He voted for GWB in his first term. He was going to vote McCain until McCain just didn’t carry himself well in the debates, at times looking very old and confused.

It’s going to be a tough battle if this guy is any indication.


6 posted on 07/06/2009 7:27:12 AM PDT by brownsfan (The public schools and the SRM, they are killing us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
-- It's going to be a tough battle if this guy is any indication. --

Adversity builds character. Meaning, it's a good thing the battle is tough.

7 posted on 07/06/2009 7:29:38 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
"Compared to the Bush presidency, this administration is doing better."

We knew where George Bush was born.

8 posted on 07/06/2009 7:31:06 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
He also revoked an executive order signed by former President George W. Bush in 2001 that limited release of former presidents' records, and replaced it with new language aimed at more transparency.

What a load of BS.

When do we get to see the Manchurian candidate's birth certificate? His college records?

Our friends in the media can't bring themselves to take a swipe at 0 without Bush's name thrown in for cover.

9 posted on 07/06/2009 7:38:08 AM PDT by Post5203 (0bama is the Jim Jones of the new millennium.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
thinks Fox is the clown network.

This is the sort of thing which really shows how effective the MSM really is. I know people who think that Fox is staffed by slobbering, rightwing extremists who make no attempt at reporting the news -- they just dream up lies. These people also tend to think that Sarah Palin is perhaps th dumbest woman on the planet.

Very, very hard to make headway in such a climate.

10 posted on 07/06/2009 7:41:16 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I don't believe anything anyone says about anything anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

two things I think are at work here...

1)Certain more astute members of the MSM are foreseeing the coming Obama credibility crash, and are taking steps to get a foothold on the beachhead of deniability before it happens. (the vast majority though are still as clueless as cattle in the slaughterhouse chute)

2)The Euro press has not swallowed the Obama Kool-Aid to the extent that our domestic MSM has, and this disconnect places them under various forms of uncomfortable pressure as they so much desire to be part of the “world community”.


11 posted on 07/06/2009 7:49:38 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
He's a democrat; of course, the media loves him.

However, they'd better start attacking the secrecy that is going on in the White House. Obambi thinks he's a law unto himself.

12 posted on 07/06/2009 8:03:11 AM PDT by Texas_shutterbug (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Don’t count on an awakening. Note tagline.


13 posted on 07/06/2009 8:07:24 AM PDT by Savage Beast (The Left is psychotic. Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_shutterbug

The leftist worldview, however, includes the notion that the elite leadership has to be given arbitrary power and be excluded from the rules they impose on others,

because the end result is so desirable and can only be achieved through the direction of the elite.


14 posted on 07/06/2009 8:09:12 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Who’s President Obama?


15 posted on 07/06/2009 8:28:05 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Members of the corporate media live in their own world - actually, they think they rule the world, now. Things do not bode well for Obambi. Sure, it won’t be as bad as if he were a conservative, but I’m seeing signs that the honeymoon is definitely over.


16 posted on 07/06/2009 8:28:26 AM PDT by Texas_shutterbug (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
Why President Hussein Obomba is now the 'leader' of the 'free world.'

He is the African-Kenyan who now leads the pack of pansies who rule and ruin your life and your nation's economy.

17 posted on 07/06/2009 8:56:30 AM PDT by IbJensen (If Catholics voted based upon the teachings of the church, there would be no abortion and no Obomba.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Oh...President Soetoro.

Or did you mean President Davis?

That would be ironic.


18 posted on 07/06/2009 10:05:22 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Wait ‘till people start disappearing off the streets. No opponents for the annointed one.


19 posted on 07/06/2009 1:06:29 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

El Presidente Sore-Toe-o.


20 posted on 07/06/2009 2:23:01 PM PDT by IbJensen (If Catholics voted based upon the teachings of the church, there would be no abortion and no Obomba.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

LOL!


21 posted on 07/07/2009 9:21:13 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson