Skip to comments.
David Brooks: GOP Senator Had Hand On My Thigh During Dinner
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/07/11/david-brooks-gop-senator-had-hand-my-thigh-during-dinner#comment-973716 ^
Posted on 07/11/2009 7:22:55 AM PDT by chessplayer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: cubreporter
“Also he said: Ehhh, like get me outta here???? I know what I would have done. This is bogus...put the story out there with no fact to back it up. Then he wont name the guy? Bogus, bogus, bogus.”
Yup. He claims he did`nt like it, but supposedly allowed it to continue for the entire dinner.
To: cubreporter
“Bogus, bogus, bogus.”
Yes? I’m here. What do you want?
To: chessplayer
It says more about David Brooks than it does about an un-named senator.
23
posted on
07/11/2009 7:34:15 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(Obama is turning Bush's "mess" into a catastrophe.)
To: chessplayer
If true, why did`nt Brooks tell the Senator to remove his hand? Maybe he will claim Stockholm Syndrome.
24
posted on
07/11/2009 7:34:22 AM PDT
by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: chessplayer
Dave, you’re such a fame slut. Everyone knows it.
25
posted on
07/11/2009 7:37:13 AM PDT
by
NaughtiusMaximus
(This tagline temporarily closed until I finish building my deck.)
To: chessplayer
Every metrosexual has a gay story to share...and in true NYSlimes tradition it doesn’t matter if it’s true or not.
26
posted on
07/11/2009 7:41:31 AM PDT
by
crazyhorse691
(Now that the libs are in power dissent is not only unpatriotic, but, it is also racist.)
To: chessplayer
If true, why did`nt Brooks tell the Senator to remove his hand? Because he was hoping he'd move it farther up but didn't and now Brooks is having a hissy fit.
27
posted on
07/11/2009 7:41:57 AM PDT
by
fso301
To: chessplayer
That’s okay, David - when he gets to your breasts, then you can start to worry.
28
posted on
07/11/2009 7:50:54 AM PDT
by
Stosh
To: chessplayer
Brooksie loved every minute.
29
posted on
07/11/2009 7:51:38 AM PDT
by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
To: chessplayer
All of the homosexuals in the democrat party, yet the only perverts we read about are republicans. Now that’s a real coincidence, ain’t it!
30
posted on
07/11/2009 8:01:08 AM PDT
by
Oldpuppymax
(AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
To: chessplayer
Why were two men sitting that close at dinner to begin with...that had to look odd?
Dinner with a Republican Senator or was he just having cool-aid and “coke” in the back of a limo of a certain “former” Democrat Senator from Chicago?
Anyone can say anything...doesn’t mean it has an ounce of truth to it.
Larry Sinclair named names and NO ONE in the MSM mentions it. This lying weasel fabricates an “unbelievable” story from thin air and the MSM are all over it...ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!
To: chessplayer
More junk to distract from what is really going on.
32
posted on
07/11/2009 8:05:34 AM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: chessplayer
Almost makes you wonder what he’d let Obama do to him.
To: chessplayer
LMAO!!!
“the whole time”??
To: chessplayer
Aw who gives a $hit....he's gay, you're gay, everyone's gay in the world today. Can't turn on a tv program or watch a movie without 1 or 2 or 7 gays in the story line. What's the big hairy deal? Let's all glorify and honor all things gay OK?
Well the hell with that, I'm sick and tired of it. I am a raging heterosexual male who still likes a woman. I want some good old fashioned hetero stories out there for those few like me, who are still heterosexual. What are there about 20,000 of us left in America? Boy I'm tired of stories about gays. Gay, Gay, Gay, Gay.....all gay all the time. pfffft....gimme just plain old vanilla stuff ......PLEASE?
To: chessplayer
David Brooks, in the running to be the NYT’s longest-running token conservative.
Unbelievable.
36
posted on
07/11/2009 8:10:22 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: chessplayer
Why didn't Brooks knock him out?
Why didn't Brooks remove his hand?
Why didn't Brooks name him when it happened?
Why doesn't Brooks name him now?
Sissy or liar?
Or both?
37
posted on
07/11/2009 8:11:19 AM PDT
by
roses of sharon
(It is not actual suffering but a taste of better things which excites people to revolt: Hoffer)
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
38
posted on
07/11/2009 8:13:08 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: mass55th
Pretty talented guy who only uses one hand to complete a full meal. I wonder if he had steak? Id like to have seen that accomplishment.Did Brooks say WHICH hand? If Brooks was seated on the politician's right, then it had to be the right hand. In such case, we need to list all the LEFT HANDED Senators to find the culprit. s/off
To: chessplayer
Exactly, and furthermore this is he said/he said. Was there a witness to this? Unless he has corroboration, it's just "talk". The right response to this (if even true) would have been, leaning over and whispering, "please remove your hand from my "inner thigh"".
This sounds suspicious, it was probably his dinner napkin, how tedious of this creepy man.
40
posted on
07/11/2009 8:34:59 AM PDT
by
JENINMO
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson