Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Czar is too mild a world for what Sunstein is about to become. How about "regulator in chief"? How about "lawgiver"? He is Obama's Obama.

We're about to be Czarred and fettered!

Here's Cass Sunstein describing FreeRepublic.com as "group polarization," where people segregate themselves so effectively online with other like-minded thinkers that they create an echo chamber where the group's worst and most malevolent opinions get reinforced and strengthened. "We might want to consider," Sunstein startlingly told the Times recently, "the possibility of ways of requiring or encouraging sites to link to opposing viewpoints."

8 posted on 07/11/2009 2:50:21 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WilliamofCarmichael

I guess he's changed his mind!

Really interesting coming from a guy who wrote this in 2003...

Review Why Societies Need Dissent...shows that demands for lock-step conformity are wrong and uninformed thinking. Sunstein's important new study is filled with empirical evidence of the significance of opposition, found in his compelling explanations of the need for, and benefits of, disagreement. Sunstein reveals that, in fact, the influence of dissenters is for the better, be it with courts, juries, corporate boardrooms, churches, sports teams, student organizations or faculties, not to mention 'the White House, Congress and the Supreme Court...during times of both war and peace.' --John W. Dean (Los Angeles Times Book Review )

41 posted on 07/12/2009 4:25:45 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamofCarmichael
We're about to be Czarred and fettered! Great catch phrase. If you don't put it on a bumper sticker, I will.
44 posted on 07/12/2009 4:43:30 AM PDT by CDFingers (Free Massachusetts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

“We could also imagine a future in which those who spread false rumors are categorized as such, discounted and marginalized . . . people would approach rumors skeptically even they provide comfort and fit their own biases.”

So we’d “marginalize” nearly all of the mainstream media?


46 posted on 07/12/2009 5:02:47 AM PDT by CTyank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson