Posted on 07/12/2009 8:53:33 AM PDT by Lorianne
What is a mancession, you ask? It's a recession that hurts men much more than women, and we are allegedly in the worst mancession in recent history. Eighty percent of job losses in the last two years were among men, said AEI scholar Christina Hoff Summers, and it could get worse.
Here some graphs provided by Mark Perry, an economist from the University of Michigan who coined the term mancession that, with any luck, is not long for our world. Unfortunately this trend doesn't look to be reversing itself any time soon.
How do we explain this? The decline in manufacturing jobs is certainly one thing. Greg Mankiw adds another likely explanation: Residential construction, which boomed during the early part of this decade, has been eviscerated in the housing slump. Nine out of ten construction workers are male, and seven out of ten manufacturing workers are men. Those sectors alone have lost more than 2.5 million jobs.
On the other hand, many women are in industries that aren't facing such devastating, and possibly permanent, upheaval. I keep coming back to this graph about net jobs created in the last ten years in the health and education sectors:
(Excerpt) Read more at business.theatlantic.com ...
It’s an affirmative action economy!
Just look at Hillary! and Michelle......aren't they the epitome of femininity?? Doesn't EVERY young girl aspire to be Hillary! or Michelle??? /s
I can’t even afford a manzierre, that’s how bad this mancession is....
Who's complaining now?
There CAN be no recovery until Obozo is out of office.
It’s a recession when your neighbor loses his job.
A depression when you lose yours.
And a recovery when Obama loses his.
It’s time to get those women barefoot and pregnant and back into the kitchen feeding babies.
Thanks. I used to be a fringe Feminist. I grew up when I realized that Feminists aren’t really for all women, just Leftist women and Leftist causes. The women of this world should wake up to the fact that men and women ARE different and viva la difference!
Nice add-on!
And great (absolutely true) tag line too!
They only earn less because they are, typically, in different jobs. It's what sorts of jobs that have been lost, not the plumbing of the people holding them that has raised the male unemployment rate.
That said, it doesn't bode well for the future. Extending the "no men needed" model of the welfare ghettos to the working population.
Should these men be put on the endangered species list & then watched carefully? (LOL)
Men: We do the jobs that women refuse to do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.