Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

*Live Thread - Sessions and Schumer differ on Sotomayor style
ap/yahoo news ^ | 7-13-09 | Mark Sherman

Posted on 07/13/2009 4:39:03 AM PDT by STARWISE

The leading Judiciary Committee Republican is charging that Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is "out of the mainstream" of legal thinking and has a very activist judicial profile.

Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama made the assertion just hours before Sotomayor, who would be the third woman to join the court, was to face her initial confirmation hearing.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 111th; confirmation; schumer; scotus; sessions; sotomayor; wiselatina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501-505 next last
Sotomayor's a slam dunk, say Obama, Schumer on eve of congressional hearings

President Obama calls Sonia Sotomayor (below) to wish her good luck at her confirmation hearings that start Monday.

1 posted on 07/13/2009 4:39:03 AM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

It’s all over but the crying. There’s no way she doesn’t get in. Not when they have 60 votes.


2 posted on 07/13/2009 4:48:56 AM PDT by paul544 (3D-Joy OH Boy!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
The leading Judiciary Committee Republican is charging that Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is "out of the mainstream" of legal thinking

She would fit right into the United States Senate then!!!!!!!

3 posted on 07/13/2009 4:51:17 AM PDT by eeriegeno (<p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul544

If all eight GOP members of the Judiciary Committee stick together and vote “no” on her nomination, it goes nowhere.

Until the Dems change the Committe rules, that is.

Does the GOP have the guts to do this? Sotomayor is clearly unqualified to be on the Supreme Court.

The Dems skewered every SC nominee by the Republicans since Bork in 1987.

It should not be a matter of letting the President have their nominees, when they are radical, unqualified, and prejudiced. Look at the radical Ginsburg, who finally admitted that eugenices was a reason for Roe v. Wade, in her view.

Democrats are the enemy of freedom.


4 posted on 07/13/2009 4:55:14 AM PDT by exit82 (Sarah Palin is President No. 45. Get behind her, GOP, or get out of the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: STARWISE

The linked source, title and content doesn’t line up with what you have posted in the main article section of this thread. Do you have a working link for the story?


6 posted on 07/13/2009 4:59:19 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Getty Photos allow none of their images to be posted on Free Republic.


7 posted on 07/13/2009 5:00:27 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Are the Republicans going to find their spines to object?


8 posted on 07/13/2009 5:01:20 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Dam&it ... they changed the title ...!! The title I posted was the exact wording 15 mins. ago ... jeesh. Let me see if I can find it.


9 posted on 07/13/2009 5:01:52 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

I guess it was 25 mins ago when it was out there .. it’s changed. That is SO maddening.

New title - 16 minutes ago — same reporter and link

Sessions and Schumer defer on Sotomayor style

Can you change it to the current title please ?


10 posted on 07/13/2009 5:04:31 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

If BO nominated Hugo Chavez, the GOP would rumble a little and then confirm his nomination.

Not one patriot in the Senate!


11 posted on 07/13/2009 5:05:44 AM PDT by jch10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

I can’t believe they change their headlines like that .. poof .. it’s another one!


12 posted on 07/13/2009 5:06:08 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE


13 posted on 07/13/2009 5:07:24 AM PDT by paulycy (Liberal DOUBLE-STANDARDS are HATE crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

They’ve even changed the wording! I’ll leave it to your
discretion .. sorry that you have to get involved in this aggravation. What are they rewriting for ?


14 posted on 07/13/2009 5:07:36 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Here’s exactly what I posted ... it was picked up by a blog:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Leading Judiciary Republican charges Supreme Court nominee Sotomayor ‘out of mainstream’
Mark Sherman
July 13th, 2009

Sonia-SotomayorSupreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor ‘out of mainstream’

WASHINGTON — The leading Judiciary Committee Republican is charging that Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is “out of the mainstream” of legal thinking and has a very activist judicial profile.

Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama made the assertion just hours before Sotomayor, who would be the third woman to join the court, was to face her initial confirmation hearing.

http://blog.taragana.com/n/leading-judiciary-republican-charges-supreme-court-nominee-sotomayor-out-of-mainstream-107893/


15 posted on 07/13/2009 5:10:40 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Thank you VERY much. This is nutz.


16 posted on 07/13/2009 5:12:39 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

My reference post with all the links ?


17 posted on 07/13/2009 5:13:36 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: exit82
That is my understanding of the rules - if there is not at least one yes vote from the minority (Republicans in this case) members on the committee then the nomination is dead in the water.

But during a Megan Kelly (FNC) interview of Sessions last week she asked the question - paraphrasing "If all Republicans on the committee vote no, then the nomination does not move forward, could that happen"?"

Sessions responded "I don't think that is true at least it is not the way the committee has operated over the last few years."

Just Damn!

18 posted on 07/13/2009 5:14:37 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; April Lexington; ...
Fox News: Watch Confirmation Hearing Beginning at 10 a.m. EDT

CSPAN COVERAGE: Confirmation Hearings Begin for Judge Sonia Sotomayor - 10:00 a.m. edt

Leahy, Sessions Announce Witness List For Sotomayor Hearing

_________________________________________________________

Sessions "Flabbergasted" by Sotomayor's Philosophy

Excerpt:

Republican Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama said today that Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor's judicial philosophy, as articulated in her speeches, marks "a blow, I think, at the very ideal of American justice."

"In a number of her speeches, for example, she has advocated a view that suggests that your personal experiences, even prejudices — she uses that word — it's expected that they would influence a decision you make," he told "Face The Nation" host Bob Schieffer.

*snip*

"When you show empathy for one party, Bob, you necessarily show a bias against another group."

________________________________

Sonia Sotomayor cramming in practice sessions near the West Wing

Excerpt:

These days, federal appeals court Judge Sonia Sotomayor is not in her New York chambers. She's not weighing cases or interrogating counsel or even writing opinions.

Instead, with hearings to start Monday in the historic, much-anticipated Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation process, Sotomayor is holed up in a small office in the Eisenhower Old Executive Office Building next to the White House. "She's got to hit the books," said Thomas Goldstein, a D.C. appellate attorney. "They can ask you about any part of the law. And she's got to be ready for that."

In an earlier round of get-acquainted-sessions, Sotomayor met with 70 of the Senate's 100 ......members, which should help the cordiality quotient. And the newest senator, Minnesota's Al Franken, has already tipped his hand that he plans to ask her about campaign finance laws, expected to come before the court this session.


19 posted on 07/13/2009 5:18:20 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Charles E. Schumer ~ New York Democrat

Leading the confirmation effort in the Senate as the White House-designated “sherpa” to guide Judge Sotomayor on Capitol Hill. Urged the president to nominate a Hispanic to the Supreme Court in a letter, recommending Judge Sotomayor and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/06/19/us/politics/0619-scotus.html


20 posted on 07/13/2009 5:24:32 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501-505 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson