Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soldier balks at deploying; says Obama isnít president
Ledger Enquirer ^ | Tuesday, Jul. 14, 2009 | Lily Gordon

Posted on 07/14/2009 5:16:06 AM PDT by NMEwithin

U.S. Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, set to deploy to Afghanistan, says he shouldn’t have to go. His reason? Barack Obama was never eligible to be president because he wasn’t born in the United States. Actually, Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961, two years after it became a state. Cook’s lawyer, Orly Taitz, who has also challenged the legitimacy of Obama’s presidency in other courts, filed a request last week in federal court seeking a temporary restraining order and status as a conscientious objector for his client. In the 20-page document — filed July 8 with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia — the California-based Taitz asks the court to consider granting his client’s request based upon Cook’s belief that Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces. Cook further states he “would be acting in violation of international law by engaging in military actions outside the United States under this President’s command. ... simultaneously subjecting himself to possible prosecution as a war criminal by the faithful execution of these duties.” Cook, a reservist, received the orders mobilizing him to active duty on June 9. According to this document, which accompanies Cook’s July 8 application for a temporary restraining order, he has been ordered to report to MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Fla., on Wednesday. From there, the Florida resident would go to Fort Benning before deploying overseas. A hearing to discuss Cook’s requests will take place in federal court here Thursday at 9:30 a.m.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; article2section1; bhodod; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; eligibility; inelgible; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; soldier; stefancook
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-233 next last
I like how the author of the article just flat out states that Obama was actually born in Hawaii in 1961...she knows this how?
1 posted on 07/14/2009 5:16:06 AM PDT by NMEwithin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

But Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook knows better.


2 posted on 07/14/2009 5:19:21 AM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

While I understand his point he probably would have been called to active duty if Bush was still in office.

This isn’t the right time or place for such a protest and reflects poorly on him and his unit.


3 posted on 07/14/2009 5:19:26 AM PDT by TSgt (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

I like how the author just flat out states that Orly Taitz is a “he.” Clueless!


4 posted on 07/14/2009 5:21:16 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin
Actually, Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961, two years after it became a state.

Actually Lily, BO hasn't been able to prove he was born in Hawaii.
5 posted on 07/14/2009 5:21:47 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

so for democrats it’s okay to challenge the existence of GOD himself, but you cannot challenge the existence of the obama Birth Certificate.


6 posted on 07/14/2009 5:22:38 AM PDT by Samurai_Jack (ride out and confront the evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

Seems we have a NEW Michael New.


7 posted on 07/14/2009 5:24:29 AM PDT by varina davis (Life is not a dress rehearsal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

What happens to this case if Orly isn’t accepted to practice in GA since it is already filed?


8 posted on 07/14/2009 5:24:51 AM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Diogenes can finally give up his watch.


9 posted on 07/14/2009 5:25:02 AM PDT by Salamander (Cursed with Second Sight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin
"Actually, Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961,"

"Where's the poof?"

10 posted on 07/14/2009 5:26:45 AM PDT by Enterprise (When they come for your guns and ammo, give them the ammo first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

One of our own!


11 posted on 07/14/2009 5:28:54 AM PDT by Bushbacker1 (I'll miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

I don’t think he says he knows better. He is challenging Obama’s status as a natural born citizen. Since Obama has spent a million dollars trying to hide his status, among other documents he is hiding, this is a fair challenge.

Obama could simply put these issues to rest by providing his BC.


12 posted on 07/14/2009 5:29:08 AM PDT by dforest (Anyone dumb enough to have voted for him deserves what they get.. No Pity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

“What happens to this case if Orly isn’t accepted to practice in GA since it is already filed?”

I am surprised that the pleading was accepted for filing, though it may be that the Plaintiff signed it himself pro se in which case it would be accepted. If Taitz is later admitted, she can enter an appearance or perhaps some member of the bar of the Middle District of Georgia will make a motion for her to be admitted pro hac vice.


13 posted on 07/14/2009 5:31:19 AM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

I think the case is filed in CA....Not GA.


14 posted on 07/14/2009 5:31:36 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

This is the Cook case. It is GA. But what happens to a case, when it is filed and there is no admitted attorney?


15 posted on 07/14/2009 5:33:50 AM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

I wonder how far he would get if he was just an E-2 or E-3?


16 posted on 07/14/2009 5:34:50 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin
"In the 20-page document — filed July 8 with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia — the California-based Taitz asks the court to consider granting his client’s request based upon Cook’s belief that Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces."

"his?"...last I checked, Orly Taitz is a female. LOL And Lily Gordon must know something no one else outside Hussein and his immediate famliy knows when she states..."Actually, Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961"
17 posted on 07/14/2009 5:35:02 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

It is signed by Orly with a pending hac vice. As of yesterday, the clerk was still reviewing it. What happens to the Cook case if she isn’t admitted?


18 posted on 07/14/2009 5:35:30 AM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Stealing it from the safe where it is hidden, taken to someone’s house, scanned and uploaded onto the ‘Net would be enough.


19 posted on 07/14/2009 5:36:50 AM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Don’t know...I was confused...thought it was the case we stayed up for all hours waiting for the LA times article. That is CA ...Judge ruling on merits not procedure.


20 posted on 07/14/2009 5:37:43 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; BP2
BP would know

It is signed by Orly with a pending hac vice. As of yesterday, the clerk was still reviewing it. What happens to the Cook case if she isn’t admitted?

21 posted on 07/14/2009 5:40:04 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

We need the COLB, that is not in a safe in a house. The BC that was pictured on the net was proven to be a fraud and acknowleged that is was a phoney.


22 posted on 07/14/2009 5:41:36 AM PDT by dforest (Anyone dumb enough to have voted for him deserves what they get.. No Pity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Actually the CA one was ruling on procedure. Not merits.


23 posted on 07/14/2009 5:42:15 AM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

The left is doing this with every issue that is a lie.
I think it must be one of Satan’s methods, as they use it so much.

Just flat out state that the lie is the truth.


24 posted on 07/14/2009 5:43:40 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

“”thought it was the case we stayed up for all hours waiting for the LA times article. That is CA ...Judge ruling on merits not procedure.””

What did happen in the court in Santa Ana yesterday? Haven’t seen any reports yet.. Everyone was placing a lot of confidence in the judge (Carter?), a Bush appointee.


25 posted on 07/14/2009 5:45:01 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

The chickensht Supreme Court will rule that a

soldier being deployed into physical danger
doesn’t have “standing” to challenge the status of the
Commander in Chief that is ordering him to risk his life.


26 posted on 07/14/2009 5:46:05 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush; Calpernia

Here’s WND will get the LAT article too.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2291945/posts


27 posted on 07/14/2009 5:47:50 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
Seems we have a NEW Michael New.

And I doubt that this one will fare any better than the original.

28 posted on 07/14/2009 5:48:13 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush; Calpernia

LA times:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2292023/posts

Do you want to see the copy of the email that preceeded both?


29 posted on 07/14/2009 5:50:05 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MrB
The chickensht Supreme Court will rule that...

I imagine that a judge at a much lower level will scratch his head and wonder just what the hell conscientious objector status has to do with who is president. Either the plaintiff is morally, ethically, or religiously opposed to the war or he is not. Whoever sits in the White House has nothing to do with that.

30 posted on 07/14/2009 5:50:42 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Most likely.

I think the troll pods hatched overnight. We are going to need to get out our super dooper BS blasters today!

LOL


31 posted on 07/14/2009 5:51:32 AM PDT by dforest (Anyone dumb enough to have voted for him deserves what they get.. No Pity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

“What happens to the Cook case if she isn’t admitted?”

The local rule covering this is:

83.1.2(c). PERMISSION TO PRACTICE IN A PARTICULAR CASE. Any member in good standing of the bar of any other district court of the United States who is not a member of the State Bar of Georgia and who does not reside in or maintain an office in this state for the practice of law, will be permitted to appear and participate in a particular case, civil or criminal, in this court subject to the following provisions:

1. In a civil case in which a party is represented only by counsel not a member of the bar of this court, such counsel must designate in writing some willing member of the local bar of this court upon whom motions and papers may be served and who will be designated as local counsel. That designation shall not become effective until such local counsel has entered a written appearance therein.

In addition, in any case in which an attorney makes an appearance in any action or case pending in this court and said attorney is not a member of the bar of this court, he shall certify that he is a member in good standing of a district court of the United States and shall file a certificate of good standing from that court with the clerk of this court.

2. Any attorney representing the United States government, or any agency thereof, and any attorney employed by the Community Defender Organization of this district may appear and participate in particular actions or proceedings in his official capacity without a petition for admission or certificate of good standing, provided he is a member in good standing of a bar of a district court of the United States.

If that isn’t complied with, I would think the complaint would be stricken, likely on the court’s on motion, pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 11(a).


32 posted on 07/14/2009 5:51:53 AM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

Wrong battle, wrong place, wrong time Major. You are an Army Officer and its time to do your duty.


33 posted on 07/14/2009 5:56:28 AM PDT by Bulldawg Fan (Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin
I like how the author of the article just flat out states that Obama was actually born in Hawaii in 1961...she knows this how?

A number of members of Congress do the same thing, Tom Price (GA -6), Saxby Chambliss, Johnny Isakson among them. They don't wan't to do anything to upset the applecart - it might cost them an invitation to one on zer0's cockatil parties.

IF 0bama is proven to be not qualified and is eventually removed, what happens to Sotomeyer? Supreme Court justices are supposed to be nominated by the [real] President. I

34 posted on 07/14/2009 5:58:56 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Remove the Kenyan Usurper - FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Don’t know...I was confused...thought it was the case we stayed up for all hours waiting for the LA times article. That is CA ...Judge ruling on merits not procedure.

Other way around. The judge found that the defendant had never been properly served within the required 120 days and he granted Taitz an extension so she could do so. That's within his powers to do. While Obama is the defendant, nobody expects the President to be served in person and the local U.S. attorney is authorized to be served on behalf of the U.S. Apparently Taitz didn't realize that. The judge ordered both Taitz and the representative from the U.S. Attorney's Office to consult and go together to properly serve the U.S. attorney. So now the defense has another 60 days to respond, at which time they will no doubt file another motion to dismiss. At that time the judge will either grant the motion to dismiss or let it move forward.

35 posted on 07/14/2009 5:59:41 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush; Calpernia

There were severl version being posted as people were getting them from differenct sources. Here’s one variation. (Did you see Sarah Palin Op Ed in the Washington Post?...It was posted last night too)


Just got off the phone with Orly Taitz, the attorney in Keyes v. Obama.

At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:

1. There will be a trial.

2. It will be heard on the merits.

3. Nothing will be dismissed on procedural issues.

4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.

5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.

6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.

The DOJ will be involved with the case also…. I wasn’t clear if they would be trying to get to the truth or they would just be blindly representing Obama.

Orly will be adding members of the military from California as plaintiffs also.This is from what my interpretation of our conversation.

Orly, asked me to disseminate this information out for her, she will be doing a posting later after she gets some sleep.

http://citizensagainstproobamamediabias.wordpress.com/2009/07/13/29869/


36 posted on 07/14/2009 5:59:57 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF
While I understand his point he probably would have been called to active duty if Bush was still in office.

This isn’t the right time or place for such a protest and reflects poorly on him and his unit.

Not the point at all. Its about the Legitimacy of the order. An order to war by a 'Chicago Community Organizer' is not valid.An order by a legitimate POTUS is.

37 posted on 07/14/2009 6:00:05 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF
"While I understand his point he probably would have been called to active duty if Bush was still in office.

This isn’t the right time or place for such a protest and reflects poorly on him and his unit."

I'm missing your point. He's not refusing to serve on active duty. He's refusing to serve under a phony CIC.

President Bush was a legal CIC.

38 posted on 07/14/2009 6:01:01 AM PDT by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Actually, the E-2 or E-3 would be in less trouble than this Major. The Major is in for a “major” a$$ slapping. The Armed Forces don’t play games about missing movement for any reason.


39 posted on 07/14/2009 6:01:30 AM PDT by pappyone (New to Freep, still working a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

I got Pam’s email. That is what Orly told her. But that isn’t what happened.


40 posted on 07/14/2009 6:01:47 AM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LADY J; Don Corleone

I understand the argument, it’s just not the time or place.


41 posted on 07/14/2009 6:04:43 AM PDT by TSgt (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

Somebody should have mentioned in the title in brackets () that the dtory made Drudge! Maybe mods can fix it. Hopefully Rush and others will mention it - Savage, Levin.


42 posted on 07/14/2009 6:05:01 AM PDT by Frantzie (Remember when Bush was President and Americans had jobs (and ammo)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

What happened? DOes the LA TImes have it right?


43 posted on 07/14/2009 6:06:11 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

Does JAG get involved since he is MIL?


44 posted on 07/14/2009 6:06:29 AM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack

excellent

As Rush has said, neither God nor Obama has produced a birth certificate


45 posted on 07/14/2009 6:07:56 AM PDT by silverleaf (Save the earth. It's the only planet with chocolate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Non-Sequitur

Unfortunately, not my favorite freeper, NonSequitur is right (ouch, that actually hurt to say).

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2292141/posts?page=35#35


46 posted on 07/14/2009 6:08:08 AM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin
If we could get all vets who are being assigned or even already assigned to positions in war zones to get together and take the same action, I can readily guarantee that
Photobucket
will be forced to prove his citizenship (or not).
47 posted on 07/14/2009 6:08:35 AM PDT by jongaltsr (Hope to See ya in Galt's Gulch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jongaltsr

That should read (Soldiers) not Vets.


48 posted on 07/14/2009 6:09:28 AM PDT by jongaltsr (Hope to See ya in Galt's Gulch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

The article misstates the suit that was filed. It does not request “conscientious objector” status for the major other than his objection to taking orders from an illegitimate authority. The entire suit can be seen here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17266905/05311066823

This is the suit that on pages 9-10 raises the question of whether Obama used 39 different Social Security numbers. Nobody seems to have realized this could be the thing that could have more impact than the long form BC.


49 posted on 07/14/2009 6:11:14 AM PDT by flash2368 (Scary Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

The Major is an idiot. He needs to do his job - the President is the CinC.


50 posted on 07/14/2009 6:11:38 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-233 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson