“You were there? You saw all this? Then why the f&(% didnt you notify the LA police department? Nobody else testified to any of that.”
Wow! You were there? I’ll be darned. Didn’t know there were any witnesses. All I know is what was testified to . . . the DNA . . . the bloody glove . . . his background of extreme violence . . . the “cut” finger . . . etc. But you were there, huh?
No, I wasn’t there and I’m not the one claiming I know exactly what happened. You are. The DNA? OK, but it was all but unrefuted that there was cross contamination (i.e. mixing of blood samples) on the evidence. At worst, reasonable doubt. The bloody glove? Is this the same glove that didn’t have OJ’s blood on there in spite of a cut finger — allegedly cut at the crime scene? Plus it didn’t fit when he tried them on, and blood doesn’t shrink gloves, I’m sorry to say. Sweat doesn’t even shrink them. His background of extreme violence? Specifically what? Are you seriously resting your assurance of his guilt on this?
I have no idea what happened, but if he was as guilty as you say he was, this was a screw up big time by a set of keystone cops and prosecutors to match. They cared more about their reputation in being the people that put a celebrity behind bars then they cared about justice. This case screamed for reasonable doubt.