“She is not going to solve the recession by wearing Keds.”
No, but since many of her subjects are struggling just to put food on the table, she could at least make the gesture to go for the less expensive items. After all, it’s those struggling subjects (taxpayers) who are footing the bill.
And what’s wrong with Keds? I’ve worn them. They’re comfortable. And they don’t cost $540.
Is the WH violating any ethics rules and/or tax laws?
Or is the First Lady for rent? Is she renting herself out as a human billboard? Which, if so, would be tacky in extremis.
Inquiring minds want to know :)