Posted on 07/22/2009 9:52:59 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople
Let's dish.
And a delicious dish it is. A stew of race, the New York Times, media hypocrisy and double-standards. All inadvertently stirred by the lovely and talented Times columnist, the white female Maureen Dowd.
You know all those fevered editorials they churn out over there at the New York Times editorial board? Like, for instance, the hot fury published on June 30 wonderfully titled "Firefighters and Race."
In this jewel the Times editorial board makes its displeasure plain in the very first sentence, huffing that the Supreme Court decision in favor of the New Haven firemen has "dealt a blow to diversity in the American workplace." This was followed by a July 14th column by Times columnist Dowd titled "White Man's Last Stand," to which we will return shortly.
But first, let's get the meat into the stew. You can just smell that sizzling hypocrisy, can't you?
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


Thanks-I needed that!
I NEED that!
FMCDH(BITS)
Yo. It's just too bad we're egging her about pining for a moronic leftist brat like Michael Douglas.

She looks scrumptuous.
Nope. No one wants you, you salty old tart.
P.S. DAMN those are big feet!
This article is priceless! Thanks.
Ms. Dowd is ugly on the inside and you can see it emanating outwards.
You almost never see Catherine without a smile on her face. I think that’s one of her greatest appeals. There are other women in the world who are very beautiful, but Catherine looks healthy, happy, cooperative, and problem-free. Nobody likes a problematic woman, no matter how beautiful.
Also, she eats food. She is not one of those emaciated-except-for-the-implants types. Non-neurotic, in other words.
Maureen, on the other hand, is almost never seen smiling warmly. This means something.
Mo-do needs to stop being angry about being almost-attractive, and stop sending knives and daggers at beautiful women. If Mo-do had a decent attitude and personality, she would have friends and men, and wouldn’t be so frustrated.
How’s feminism working for ya, Mo-do?
Mo like all feminists thought she could have it all. Now as her summer has turned into autumn, colors are changing and everything is falling, she’s just a bitter woman deluding into viewing herself a cougar which in fact is feminist speak for being easy, passed from man to man.
I am amazed she simply doesn’t kill herself. I cannot imagine having such resentment at society. As for sex, she could get a decent guy if the guy were sure he wouldn’t become a perpetual science experiment for her feminist theories.
You left out an important reauirement for being a cougar OLD. Maureen fits that one, too.
Thank you... Your inclusion of CZJ pictures saved me much scrolling for what I was hoping to find. Of course, I’ll expect the same when you next post a Mo-Do thread. :-)
I used autumn with it's chaging colors and falling leaves as a metophor for her age being well past peak freshness. Changing colors represent greying hair and skin spots. Like the falling leaves of autumn, everything falling represents the accumulated effects of gravity on skin, breasts and buttocks.

LOL!
Actually, I believe Dowdy is too OLD to even be considered a cougar! Aren’t cougars usually forty-something or thereabouts? Mo is well over 50, or at least looks it.
Cougars can be any age over 30. The point is that they prey on much younger men, not that they’re a particular age. If we’re going to insult someone, let’s do it right! ;-)
Ooooh! That’s COLD!
The Times' double-standard on race in its own workplace came to light as the result of Dowd's column attacking Supreme Court nominee Judge Sotomayor's critics on the Senate Judiciary Committee. The "wise Latina's" senatorial inquisitors, fumed Ms. Dowd in "White Man's Last Stand," were nothing more than "white Republican men afraid of extinction" who traffic in "codes, handshakes and clubs." Said Dowd: "President Obama wants Sotomayor, naturally, to bring a fresh perspective to the court. It was a disgrace that W. appointed two white men to a court stocked with white men. And Sotomayor made it clear that she provides some spicy seasoning to a bench when she said in a speech: I simply do not know exactly what the difference will be in my judging, but I accept there will be some based on gender and my Latina heritage.'"
That is what liberals really believe. That white men have an informal, but secretive networking-grapevine, leveraging it against their "lessers." My own workplace has every kind of minority, gender, gay support group you can imagine. HR says you can have a white group, just get a petition together and come up with a mission statement and you're good to go! Right. Like anyone is going to do that.
If this WNG (white networking group) actually did exist, I should have been a wealthy magnate by now!
Thomas Sowell also called BO a liar is he a racist as well?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.