Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sotomayor - Where Did You Put That $3.5 Million "your honor"? - SHE MUST BE STOPPED
Judicial Discipline Reform ^ | July 23, 2009 | bioqubit

Posted on 07/24/2009 10:32:14 AM PDT by bioqubit

Sotomayor is a criminal - sorry, alleged criminal - and this website explains how. http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/

The information on this website is presumably why the Senate Judiciary Committee has rescheduled the confirmation vote. I would say anytime you fail to mention around $3.5 million in assets, as Sotomayor did, you might find yourself running afoul of the law. But then what does she know? She's "just a judge".

Dr. Richard Cordero has amassed voluminous evidence against her. The committee knows about it, but they are stalling to see what the public reaction will be. Well, we are going to have to weigh in very heavily on this to get any justice at all. So, CHARGE!!!


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: agenda; cordero; corruption; democrats; soniasotomayor; sotomayor
She CAN be stopped and must be stopped. It takes time to read and understand Dr. Cordero's website, but it is critically important that everyone make the effort and then maintain a sustained assault on the Judiciary Committee.
1 posted on 07/24/2009 10:32:18 AM PDT by bioqubit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

You’re saying that she has millions in assets she did not disclose? We’ve been told she’s in debt for her teeth?


2 posted on 07/24/2009 10:34:21 AM PDT by Mamzelle (No cure for the common scold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

Come on, folks. She’s a lib. That means that she does not have to report funds to the government.

She’s the “more equal animal”.

Earth to libs: Check Orwell.


3 posted on 07/24/2009 10:35:25 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

Sotomayor is a criminal - sorry, alleged criminal - and this website explains how. http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/ The information on this website is presumably why the Senate Judiciary Committee has rescheduled the confirmation vote. I would say anytime you fail to mention around $3.5 million in assets, as Sotomayor did, you might find yourself running afoul of the law.
::::::
Now all know WHY she was nominated. She fits right in to the criminal pinnings of this administration. Lies, deception, fraud, you name it. Wow, what a beautiful resume!!!


4 posted on 07/24/2009 10:35:25 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

This link states she has EARNED 3.5 million since 1988. I think this is in line with what we already know—that she can’t hold on to a dime.


5 posted on 07/24/2009 10:37:24 AM PDT by Mamzelle (No cure for the common scold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Lies, deception, fraud, you name it. Wow, what a beautiful resume!!!

Don't forget graft.

6 posted on 07/24/2009 10:41:07 AM PDT by fullchroma (I want my country back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

She didn’t lie. She just mis-spoke.

/s


7 posted on 07/24/2009 10:49:53 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

170K in NYC? She spent it all.


8 posted on 07/24/2009 10:52:21 AM PDT by steve8714 (Obama stands astride the solar system like a god- one foot on Earth, one foot up...?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
Forget it. Another, in the line of Rat felons, that will not be scrutinized or criminalized but rather canonized. Remember this country is a Banana Republic.
9 posted on 07/24/2009 10:55:12 AM PDT by Digger (If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

It could be all that facial work and plastic surgery? No?


10 posted on 07/24/2009 10:58:18 AM PDT by Poparhoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

bookmarked


11 posted on 07/24/2009 10:58:32 AM PDT by freemama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freemama

“A Wise Latina and her money are soon parted.”


12 posted on 07/24/2009 10:59:34 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

That’s not the $3.5 million she knew.


13 posted on 07/24/2009 11:02:50 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

She and Zero are two peas in the same rotten pod.


14 posted on 07/24/2009 11:04:29 AM PDT by Califreak (I can't answer that in the abstract)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caveat emptor

ping


15 posted on 07/24/2009 11:12:32 AM PDT by caveat emptor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

She’s probably keeping the $3.5 million in her freezer...


16 posted on 07/24/2009 11:12:54 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July, democrats believe every day is April 15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

Did she pay taxes on that income?


17 posted on 07/24/2009 11:14:39 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

bttt


18 posted on 07/24/2009 11:15:33 AM PDT by MSSC6644 (Defeat Satan. Pray the Rosary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

You’re gonna love this.


19 posted on 07/24/2009 11:16:14 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

She sent money to Cooba every year, is my guess.


20 posted on 07/24/2009 11:17:22 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit
I agree she must be stopped but wonder if she can be. She has the MSM on her side, and the wise woman has much more important things to do than answer accusations from a bunch of racist and mostly white men. /sarc

But I agree with you, and will read.

21 posted on 07/24/2009 11:20:38 AM PDT by fortunecookie (Please pray for Anna, age 7, who waits for a new kidney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

She reports a half million in assets, so she’s lived on the other 3 million over the last 20 years, so it’s 150K a year in a very expensive city. She probably eats out more often than not. This is a story with no substance.

The judicial cronyism is the real story, but it’s endemic to the system.


22 posted on 07/24/2009 11:21:33 AM PDT by Valpal1 (Always be prepared to make that difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

Yeah, I can’t wade through that whole web page, but less than $200K/year for a single person in NYC is just living okay, not a likely source for huge savings.


23 posted on 07/24/2009 11:24:50 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit; Liz

It’s bad enough that’s she’s a member of the taxpayer funded racist group La Raza.

Citigroup, recently bailed out by the US taxpayer, is giving $1.75 million to La Raza.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2300138/posts


24 posted on 07/24/2009 11:26:44 AM PDT by AuntB (Tired of Left/right coast globalist party power brokers? How 'bout THE HEARTLAND AMERICA PARTY??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

This person needs some website help. Jeesh!!


25 posted on 07/24/2009 11:26:59 AM PDT by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
"Lies, deception, fraud, you name it."

The Chicago Gangstas on da Hill, homie.

26 posted on 07/24/2009 11:30:17 AM PDT by jonrick46 (The Obama Administration is a blueprint for Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Poparhoid

We know it wasn’t hair care products, including shampoo.


27 posted on 07/24/2009 11:32:02 AM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: bioqubit
I just sent the following as an e-mail to both my democrat senators (Virginia):

Senator W_______,

I have recently been quite mercilessly and almost continuously critical of you for what I perceive as your repeated kow-towing to our dangerously socialist president during the implementation of his horrific social and economic “visions” for America. However, despite my almost total philosophical opposition to virtually everything Mr. Obama stands for, and by your association as a democrat most of what YOU stand for, I try my best to be fair in my analysis and judgment of your actions in the Senate.

To that end, I am sending this message today to thank you for your vote in favor of the National Right to Carry Reciprocity Amendment (aka the “Thune Amendment” to Senate Bill 1390). Your vote in support of the basic human right to self-defense and the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States indicates to me that you, unlike many of your party colleagues, have at least a basic understanding of our founders’ intent that where the rights of the people clash with the powers (or perceived powers) of the government, the rights of the people should take precedence in almost every case.

I hope, sir, that you will soon take your understanding and support of the Constitution of the United States of America to the next level by opposing the confirmation of Sonya Sotomayor as a Justice on the United States Supreme Court. By itself, her positively illogical and almost pathological hatred (yes, I really do think it is hatred) for the Second Amendment as well as her adamant refusal to speak in support of individuals’ rights to self defense during her confirmation hearing, are enough to render her wholly unqualified to interpret ANY portion of our beloved Constitution. And, since interpretation of our Constitution is (or at least should be) the one and only task of the Supreme Court, Ms. Sotomayor is obviously a VERY poor choice to be the next justice on that court.

I urge you, PLEASE break with your political party and do the right thing by the People of the United States by voting to deny Ms. Sotomayor a seat on the United States Supreme Court. A “compelling” personal story should NOT be considered evidence that ANY individual is qualified for ANY government position.

Who knows, maybe one of them will crack...

Hey! A guy can DREAM, can't he?

29 posted on 07/24/2009 12:11:04 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

Why the jokes? Did anyone think Hillary and Bill hidden assets were a joke?

I don’t think this is either. If she lied; she should be made to step down; not only as a nominee; but as a judge as she is not fit to serve on any court.


30 posted on 07/24/2009 12:12:34 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr; bioqubit; AuntB
Where did Soto get $3.5 Million in assets? Maybe these people know.

Prominent Attorney Accuses Sotomayor of Possible Ethics Breach
FR Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 by kristinn

The following letter was sent to Senators Sessions, Hatch, Grassley, Graham and Coburn. It was also sent to Cong. Peter King (R) NY.

Text of the letter: I am an attorney in NYC who represented White House Photographer Chris Usher in litigation against Corbis, a privately held company wholly owned by Bill Gates. The case principally concerned lost Presidential and campaign photography during the 2000 Bush v. Gore Campaign and the US Supreme Court case related thereto.We won at the trial level in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York but the award to the victorious plaintiff was absurdly low. We appealed to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals where the award was inexplicably upheld.

It was revealed by opposing counsel that Judge Sotomayor and Mr. Gates’ counsel have known and (possibly worked with) each other for decades. Such relationship was never disclosed to me as plaintiff’s attorney by the Court. No opportunity for us to request that Judge Sotomayor recuse herself was afforded as this information was never disclosed. The appearance of impropriety is astounding as Judge Sotomayor could have recused herself and we could have had another Appeals Panel within days. Please contact me so that this apparently unethical judicial behavior is brought to the attention of the judiciary committee immediately. Edward C. Greenberg, Esq. contact info redacted.

=========================================

HER ACTUAL WORDS FROM THE BENCH TO AN ADMITTED DRUG DEALER: Sentencing Louis Gomez (a noncitizen), who pleaded guilty to dealing cocaine:

“[I]t is in some respects a great tragedy for our country that instead of permitting you to serve a lesser sentence and rejoin your family at an earlier time I am required by law to give you the statutory minimum. ... [W]e all understand that you were in part a victim of the economic necessities of our society, unfortunately there are laws that I must impose. “Louis Gomez, yours is the tragedy of our laws and the greatest one that I know. ... the one our congressmen never thought about and don’t think about. ... “It is no comfort to you for me to say that I am deeply, personally sorry about the sentence that I must impose, because the law requires me to do so. The only statement I can make is this is one more example of an abomination being committed before our sight. You do not deserve this, sir.”

============================================

Nelson Castellanos was arrested in NYC outside his Harlem apartment, charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine. He was holding his keys and a white shopping bag containing about $10,000, mostly in $1 and $20 bills. That evening, pursuant to a warrant, DEA personnel searched his apartment and found over 1,200 grams of cocaine, six live rounds of ammunition, a .44 caliber revolver and incriminating notebooks. All this evidence was thrown out by District Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor on the grounds that the DEA agents had not provided the magistrate with probable cause to search Castellanos's apartment.

31 posted on 07/24/2009 12:21:20 PM PDT by Liz (When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AuntB; bioqubit
Citigroup----- recently bailed out by US taxpayers-----is giving $1.75 million to La Raza.

La Raza is also financially supported by many corporations and tax-exempt foundations (listed on the Discover the Networks.org).

Among them: American Express Foundation, AT&T Foundation, Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Fannie Mae Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, W. K. Kellogg Foundation, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and Verizon Foundation.

NOTE WELL Between 2001 and 2003, the Ford Foundation gave La Raza about $9.83 million, with one grant alone totaling $8.05 million and has also assisted invaders to setup legal groups that are suing Americans.

32 posted on 07/24/2009 12:31:28 PM PDT by Liz (When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
Why the jokes?

I think it is a form of what is known as gallows humor.

We all know that this issue is unlikely to derail her almost certain confirmation to the highest court in our land. If we do not crack jokes about it then there is nothing left to do but weep quietly over the destruction of our Republic.

But, please be assured that I am fully aware of the seriousness of the situatin. I have contacted my senators several times over the last two weeks to register my vehement opposition to this wholly unqualified (and now possibly criminal) individual. I'd bet that at least some of my fellow "jokesters" on this thread are doing the same.

33 posted on 07/24/2009 12:32:11 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

“WITHHELD FROM THE COMMITTEE DELANO TO COVER UP A BANKRUPTCY FRAUD SCHEME”

Pretty serious charge, hmmm.


34 posted on 07/24/2009 1:39:00 PM PDT by muddler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

I know and it’s time to clean out Congress.


35 posted on 07/24/2009 2:17:51 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Add AARP and Fannie Mae...how’s that for irony. I’ll bet Fannie Mae is contributing after their bail out as well. We get to pay La Raza as taxpayers TWICE. How much more corrupt does this all have to get before people start to get it?


36 posted on 07/24/2009 5:30:56 PM PDT by AuntB (Tired of Left/right coast globalist party power brokers? How 'bout THE HEARTLAND AMERICA PARTY??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson