Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paper: Bush Considered Sending Troops Into New York
FoxNews ^ | July 24, 2009

Posted on 07/24/2009 10:38:47 PM PDT by Sammy67

The Bush administration in 2002 considered sending U.S. troops into a Buffalo, New York, suburb to arrest a group of terror suspects, the New York Times reported.

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration in 2002 considered sending U.S. troops into a Buffalo, New York, suburb to arrest a group of terror suspects in what would have been a nearly unprecedented use of military power within the United States, The New York Times reported.

Vice President Dick Cheney and several other Bush advisers at the time strongly urged that the military be used to apprehend men who were suspected of plotting with Al Qaeda, who later became known as the Lackawanna Six, the Times reported on its Web site Friday night. It cited former administration officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; buffalo; counterterrorism; georgebush; islam; jihadinamerica; lackawanna; lackawannasix; lakeerie; lakeontario; mosque; muslim; nationalguard; newyork; nys; september12era; terrorism; westernnewyork; wli; worldlifeinstitute; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Sammy67

The professor they interviewed seems to have forgotten Eisenhower’s use of the 101st Airborne at Central High. I’d call that a law enforcement function.


21 posted on 07/24/2009 11:41:00 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67
Vice President Dick Cheney and several other Bush advisers at the time strongly urged that the military be used to apprehend men who were suspected of plotting with Al Qaeda”

Good.
That's why I love Cheney, a strong, tough, no-nonsense man.

22 posted on 07/24/2009 11:43:45 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington
Obama is under 50%. Time to elevate him by tearing down the other side.

A sign of desperation in an incumbent.

23 posted on 07/24/2009 11:44:35 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (A woman will be the next President; I hope it's Palin instead of HRC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er

Wow! Not much left of the GOP to tear down! We did that part ourselves with McCain...


24 posted on 07/24/2009 11:46:55 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er
People in our communities who continue to support Obama need to be ostracized. Elections have consequences and if you vote for a communist, you can kiss your free market job good by. Hire only free market supporting employees. Plenty to chose from...
25 posted on 07/24/2009 11:50:24 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: panthermom
only law enforcement could handle it?

I wouldn't say that, but military should never, ever be used on our own soil unless absolutely necessary.

We ever get used to that idea, the next step is, "Mind if I camp out in your home for awhile? And if you do mind, that's too bad."

Our Founders knew it was a dangerous path, but we tend to forget.

26 posted on 07/24/2009 11:53:40 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67
They were likely basing thier actions on this:

Public Law 107-40
107th Congress

Joint Resolution

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.
Whereas, on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous violence were committed against the United States and its citizens; and
Whereas, such acts render it both necessary and appropriate that the United States exercise its rights to self-defense and to protect United States citizens both at home and abroad; and
Whereas, in light of the threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by these grave acts of violence; and
Whereas, such acts continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States; and
Whereas, the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States: Now, therefore, be it Resolved

by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This joint resolution may be cited as the "Authorization for Use of Military Force''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) In General.--That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.

(b) War Powers Resolution Requirements.--
(1) Specific statutory authorization.--Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.
(2) Applicability of other requirements.--Nothing in this resolution supercedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.

Approved September 18, 2001.

27 posted on 07/25/2009 12:25:18 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg
I don't know who was PoUS at the time but they called it 'The Veterans March on Washington' somewhere around 1918- 1920’s I think. They called out the Military and if I am not wrong, they fired on the Marchers.
28 posted on 07/25/2009 12:27:17 AM PDT by Peacekeeper357 (This is not a free ride. Become a monthly donor like me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Peacekeeper357
The Bonus Marchers. They got roughed up a bit by young men MacArthur, Patton, and Eisenhower.

http://www.worldwar1.com/dbc/bonusm.htm

29 posted on 07/25/2009 12:33:56 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: panthermom

It is currently against the law to use our own troops against our own citizens.

While bubba used our military to attack the compound in WACO he tried hard to hide that fact. Weasley Clark was involved in that disaster.


30 posted on 07/25/2009 12:40:39 AM PDT by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

I am waiting for U.S. troops to decide to send themselves into a certain situation


31 posted on 07/25/2009 12:51:12 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

My wife and I are considering having a fifth child. My wife and I are considering moving to a mansion. My wife and I are considering quitting our jobs and living under a bridge. My wife and I are considering putting up our four kids for adoption. Why does consideration all of a sudden becomes important and matter? I don’t get it. Are FREEPERS upset about this? I am not. I believe that President Bush considered a great deal of things while he was in office. WTH???


32 posted on 07/25/2009 12:52:25 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peacekeeper357

Rodney King riots, 1992. Marines, Army, and National Guard.


33 posted on 07/25/2009 1:13:39 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Do you think Obama would not send in troops to quell TEA parties?

If he did, I suspect by the next day he'd need to make a larger deployment that both Iraq and Afghanistan together within our own borders.

34 posted on 07/25/2009 2:42:47 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carley
While bubba used our military to attack the compound in WACO he tried hard to hide that fact. Weasley Clark was involved in that disaster.

Uh, yeah. What's with the word "unprecedented" in this story?

35 posted on 07/25/2009 2:54:04 AM PDT by Big Giant Head (Running my computer bare naked for over a year with no infections at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

I don’t know anymore. I suspect that less than a quarter of the people would even say a word. A tenth if we’re lucky would be out protesting for a day or two. How many would take up arms? A tenth of a tenth?


36 posted on 07/25/2009 2:58:26 AM PDT by GeronL (Guilty of the crime of deviationism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

But, he didn’t. End of story.


37 posted on 07/25/2009 3:00:45 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67
The Bush administration in 2002 considered sending U.S. troops into a Buffalo, New York, suburb to arrest a group of terror suspects, the New York Times reported.

I'm all for it.Whatever it takes to get rid of Hillary and Chuck Shumer.They've been terrorizing New York for too long.

38 posted on 07/25/2009 3:15:17 AM PDT by Uncle Meat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panthermom
That is what I think too. Our troops can only fight enemies somewhere other than the United States?

Based on the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, the Civil War, I would say ummmm... No.
39 posted on 07/25/2009 3:29:50 AM PDT by Cheburashka (Nanny states don't come cheap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka

You forgot the Whiskey Rebellion and the WV Mine Wars.


40 posted on 07/25/2009 4:44:48 AM PDT by Roccus (The Capitol, the White House, the Court House...........America's Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson