It's simple math, really.
Prediction: China will enforce a policy of mandatory euthanasia for those who reach age 60. It's simple math, really ;-)
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
Posted on 07/25/2009 6:18:33 AM PDT by NYer
It's simple math, really.
Prediction: China will enforce a policy of mandatory euthanasia for those who reach age 60. It's simple math, really ;-)
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
Yet the fewer numbers are exactly what has Shanghai worried, because the city is faced with not enough young men and women to sustain its aging population.
Serves ‘em right.
Roe v. Wade leads to more senior citizens leads to bad ratio of pensioners to workers (Social Security). This is in the United States.
Either we get rid of Roe v. Wade, or get rid of Social Security... or both.
A regular riot of an idea right!?
So, there will be more sex in China now! I thought they were trying to REPRESS that!
They fell for the Malthusian snake oil and are paying for it.
Ha! The problem is worse than that. The Chinese, faced with only being allowed one child, often aborted or murdered after birth millions of girls. The Chinese adult population before long will be severely skewed with literally millions of men for whom there are no women available.
India starts to look pretty tempting about then. Regional war becomes a near certainty. Epidemic rape and theft of women within China is another strong possibility.
It isn’t nice to fool with Mother Nature.
"The group predicted that by 2050 China will have just 1.6 working-age adults to support every person aged 60 and above, a steep decline from the 7.7 adults per pensioner back in 1975, just a few years before China instituted the one-child policy."
The Chinese, however, have forgotten about another plausible and viable option that achieves BOTH population control and maintains a healthy demographic balance, meaning a good ratio of youths to the elderly.
They can merely ban getting old unless a person gets a permit and can prove they are a contributing member of society. No more sitting on porches and dandling grandchildren on your knee, or puttering around in your garden. If you don't get your permit, you shuffle off to the "senior center," say goodbye to your loved ones, and find yourself turned into fertilizer -- which, by the way, is a productive use of your end-of-life status.
Frankly, this is hardly more inhumane than forced abortions and the infanticide that the Chinese bureaucrats sometime resort to, to ensure the one-child policy is enforced.
See? Problem solved. Easy in a godless, totalitarian society.
This is my concern as well. It’s one thing to have a reduced population, it’s much wordse if the ratio of boys to girls become so badly skewed. That daughters have become so devaled, will only lead to great unrest, and eventually to war...War for women. One would think that the Chinese family, would realise that their daughters are becoming a much a more valuable commodity...Don’t jump down my throat! That’s the way *they* think of them.
Communist China knows it all, they don’t need the advice of the illegal underground Roman Catholic Church now, do they?
One child per couple leads to more senior citizens leads to bad ratio of pensioners to workers. This is in China.
Roe v. Wade leads to more senior citizens leads to bad ratio of pensioners to workers (Social Security). This is in the United States.
Be fruitful and multiply. But in San Francisco, it's "be fruity and don't multiply".
When life isn't respected, anything evil is acceptable. Then becomes law.
Perfect example of a useless bureaucrat trying to turn theory into fact without taking human nature into account.
“millions of men for whom there are no women available.”
Well, looks Super to me. Does anyone know the prison riot rate among men due to lack of sex?
Other than that, maybe the millions of bitter career women will go there and find husbands.
There is a demographic standard for nations, when they reach a certain level of prosperity, which varies between nations, suddenly the birthrate drops to just sustainable or less (below avg. 2.3 children per family.) This just happened a few years ago in Mexico.
In the case of China, it is so large that the rules might be bent. That is, the wealth level in the coastal cities has reached the plateau, but inland hasn’t.
Importantly, while it is very difficult to raise this birthrate, it is easy for government and society to intentionally or otherwise, lower it even further. That is, at this point, when additional pressures of many kinds are put on potential parents, it will convince more of them to either have just one child, or none at all.
High levels of pollution, also common in China, also affect the downward trend. And a serious decrease happens in bad economic times.
Thirty years of the one-child policy has caused an irrevocable cultural change. It can’t be turned on-and-off on a dime.
China’s in for a demographic collapse.
I’ve got it! Issue medals to mothers who have extra children!
What? Der Fuehrer already tried it?
Ban abortion and birth control! Force mothers to carry to term and establish state-run orphanages!
What? Ceaucescu already tried it?
This one child policy was a mistake from the start, as most of us here know. But at least after one generation (late 90's) the demographic math should have made the obvious obvious to them. I guess better late than never.
Serves ‘em right.
I don't know if I agree. Because the people who suffer will be the same who have suffered under the regime, and those who imposed the totalitarian commie rules will continue unscathed, supported into old age, having the number of children that suits them.
And Shanghai should be worried. The young people there live like in the west, a thriving middle class, even less likely to run back to the country and support aging relatives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.