Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Adolescent chest-beating aside, how can the people resist a government with modern armed forces, weapons of mass destruction, and the will to use them against its own citizens?

Sobering thought, particularly the bit about the will to use force against its own citizens.


8 posted on 07/25/2009 8:50:48 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal (Sarah Palin - It's what happens when you attempt to bikini wax a bear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: definitelynotaliberal
Look at Iran. The mullahs have said that even if only 1 million of Iran's 70 million people actually back the government, that's enough to maintain power.

As long as it's the right 1 million people with a monopoly on the weapons.

9 posted on 07/25/2009 8:58:26 AM PDT by Publius (Conservatives aren't always right. We're just right most of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal

Our armed forces have taken an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. Any action taken by us or by people who believe as we do would have the same goal.

I think we can depend on our soldiers to uphold their oath, and support any action we might take.


10 posted on 07/25/2009 9:34:45 AM PDT by wolfpat (Moderate=Clueless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal
Adolescent chest-beating aside, how can the people resist a government with modern armed forces, weapons of mass destruction, and the will to use them against its own citizens?

I think the answer is found in the preceding chapter, Galts speech...

"Do not attempt to rise on the looters’ terms or to climb a ladder while they’re holding the ropes. Do not allow their hands to touch the only power that keeps them in power: your living ambition. Go on strike-in the manner I did. Use your mind and skill in private, extend your knowledge, develop your ability, but do not share your achievements with others. Do not try to produce a fortune, with a looter riding on your back. Stay on the lowest rung of their ladder, earn no more than your barest survival, do not make an extra penny to support the looters’ state. Since you’re captive, act as a captive, do not help them pretend that you’re free. Be the silent, incorruptible enemy they dread. When they force you, obey-but do not volunteer. Never volunteer a step in their direction, or a wish, or a plea, or a purpose. Do not help a holdup man to claim that he acts as your friend and benefactor. Do not help your jailers to pretend that their jail is your natural state of existence. Do not help them to fake reality. That fake is the only dam holding off their secret terror, the terror of knowing they’re unfit to exist; remove it and let them drown; your sanction is their only life belt. “If you find a chance to vanish into some wilderness out of their reach, do so, but not to exist as a bandit or to create a gang competing with their racket; build a productive life of your own with those who accept your moral code and are willing to struggle for a human existence. You have no chance to win on the Morality of Death or by the code of faith and force; raise a standard to which the honest will repair: the standard of Life and Reason."

Proving to others that it is possible to live this way is, in my opinion, the most effective strategy. Earlier on I mentioned the 'punch vs. shrug' conundrum. This is what it has distilled down to. The 'punch' (armed confrontation) is not only absorbed by the looters, it adds to their power and used against you. The 'shrug' denies them your resources and reduces their power and adds to yours.

Nancy Reagan had it right, although she may not have understood the full implication, when she told our children to "Just say NO!"

24 posted on 07/25/2009 6:50:24 PM PDT by whodathunkit (Shrugging as I leave for the Gulch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal
Adolescent chest-beating aside, how can the people resist a government with modern armed forces, weapons of mass destruction, and the will to use them against its own citizens?

Absolutely no one can maintain a 300 yard security perimeter forever. No one.

25 posted on 07/25/2009 7:29:46 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal; Jeff Head
Adolescent chest-beating aside, how can the people resist a government with modern armed forces, weapons of mass destruction, and the will to use them against its own citizens?

AH HA! Finally something I can answer. read this: What good can a handgun do against an Army.

38 posted on 07/31/2009 7:30:32 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (if the government makes trading a used car this hard how are they going to handle a doctor visit?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson